[smudgie]

Hmmmmm, firstly, if it was a personal work pension plan etc then she should have named him.
Secondly, he is too young to be entitled to a state pension.
I know it's a different country but it all smells a bit fishy to me.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by smudgie

Hmmmmm, firstly, if it was a personal work pension plan etc then she should have named him.
Secondly, he is too young to be entitled to a state pension.
I know it's a different country but it all smells a bit fishy to me.:joker:

you went there Smudge, though as her husband he wouldn't technically need to be named as he would automatically be entitled, not sure if there is a lower age limit either as this would be discrimination