[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Cherie

you are happy to take on Zulu's word for it though, that he was offended, even though he wasn't to begin with as offence for the whole Zulu population

I am happy to take 'the Zulus' or Mr Gumedes word for it yes, even though he initially wasn't of course why wouldn't I?

Of course I haven't ever suggested that Mr Gumede is offended on behalf of all Zulu... What a strange thing to insinuate.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I am happy to take 'the Zulus' or Mr Gumedes word for it yes, even though he initially wasn't of course why wouldn't I?



Of course I haven't ever suggested that Mr Gumede is offended on behalf of all Zulu... What a strange thing to insinuate.

Yet you weren't happy for Livia to not be offended on her own behalf, you insinuated she was speaking for all Jews? you can't have it both ways

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Yet you weren't happy for Livia to not be offended on her own behalf, you insinuated she was speaking for all Jews? you can't have it both ways

Are you Livias official spokesperson now?...ok.

I haven't got it both ways...I never requested it both ways.

If you re read my post again you will see that I insinuated very strongly she did not speak for the entire Jewish community.

She was speaking for herself relaying a story in relation to a situation she found herself in that (for me at least) inferred that if there was no intent there was no offence to be taken...That of course is entirely subjective and relies on the circumstances surrounding to two scenarios.

The inference was that is she wasn't offended at that why was Mr Gumede offended at this, how else is her comment to be interpreted?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Are you Livias official spokesperson now?...ok.

I haven't got it both ways...I never requested it both ways.

If you re read my post again you will see that I insinuated very strongly she did not speak for the entire Jewish community.

She was speaking for herself relaying a story in relation to a situation she found herself in that (for me at least) inferred that if there was no intent there was no offence to be taken...That of course is entirely subjective and relies on the circumstances surrounding to two scenarios.

The inference was that is she wasn't offended at that why was Mr Gumede offended at this, how else is her comment to be interpreted?

No why do you think that, I responded as it fitted with other points I addressed as you well know, didn't realise we had to keep within certain parameters, anything else you would like to dictate while you are at it?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Cherie

No why do you think that, I responded as it fitted with other points I addressed as you well know, didn't realise we had to keep within certain parameters, anything else you would like to dictate while you are at it?

It didn't fit though...You completely misinterpreted my post by asking me to clarify a statement I didn't make, and somehow that's my fault :/

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

It didn't fit though...You completely misinterpreted my post by asking me to clarify a statement I didn't make, and somehow that's my fault :/

No I don't believe I did misinterpret your post, if deleted posts were still in evidence it would back that up

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Cherie

No I don't believe I did misinterpret your post, if deleted posts were still in evidence it would back that up

Again to clarify there have been none of my posts removed from this thread.