[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

Did you misread my post or that article / rhetorical

It suffiiciently clarifies all the reasons why such a garment should not be allowed in the West including its use by terrorists and criminals.

The garment is as offensive to many women as the robes of the KKK are to many black people and that would not be allowed on our streets. As it is categorically not a requirement of Islam for women to wear it then religious reasons are not even relevant.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

The garment is as offensive to many women as the robes of the KKK are to many black people and that would not be allowed on our streets.

You're literally a living parody

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

You're literally a living parody

And your baiting is as usual completely transparent. But of course you have your saviour at hand which explains it. No further clarification required as many wil get it.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

And your baiting is as usual completely transparent. But of course you have your saviour at hand which explains it. No further clarification required as many wil get it.

You just compared the meaning behind the robes of the KKK to a burqa. Its like you literally eat the daily mail for breakfast.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

You just compared the meaning behind the robes of the KKK to a burqa. Its like you literally eat the daily mail for breakfast.

That demonstrates your lack of understanding or concern for what the Burkha represents to many women. Female slavery is an insignificant issue to some men for obvious reasons.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

That demonstrates your lack of understanding or concern for what the Burkha represents to many women. Female slavery is an insignificant issue to some men for obvious reasons.

Right but you are acknowledging that there is a literal meaning, and a misinterpretation? Surely. I genuinely don't know how far back I need to go with you.

There is only one meaning with the KKK robes. And your comparison is ugly, and idiotic.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

Right but you are acknowledging that there is a literal meaning, and a misinterpretation? Surely. I genuinely don't know how far back I need to go with you.

There is only one meaning with the KKK robes. And your comparison is ugly, and idiotic.

Your dismissal of the significance of requiring a woman to wear a Burkha and how offencive that is and how it is often used to enslave and abuse women who have no power is what many women would find ugly and idiotic.

It is every bit as offensive. Slavery is slavery and can’t be measured with one deemed to be more serious than another.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

It suffiiciently clarifies all the reasons why such a garment should not be allowed in the West including its use by terrorists and criminals.

The garment is as offensive to many women as the robes of the KKK are to many black people and that would not be allowed on our streets. As it is categorically not a requirement of Islam for women to wear it then religious reasons are not even relevant.

It's an opinion piece on a story about domestic abuse.

You were asked if you had an example of a terrorist that got away because they wore a burkha. You didn't offer up an example, you just posted an opinion piece that took a real case of domestic violence and haphazardly used it to link to terrorism.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

It's an opinion piece on a story about domestic abuse.

You were asked if you had an example of a terrorist that got away because they wore a burkha. You didn't offer up an example, you just posted an opinion piece that took a real case of domestic violence and haphazardly used it to link to terrorism.

I explained it’s relevance in my opinion. There have been many reports of criminals/terrorists escaping in Burkhas as i’m Sure many have seen.

To try to imply that to cover your face in public areas is ok in modern times when security and identity increasingly play an important part in our everyday lives is ludicrous. One rule for all.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I explained it’s relevance in my opinion. There have been many reports of criminals/terrorists escaping in Burkhas as i’m Sure many have seen.

To try to imply that to cover your face in public areas is ok in modern times when security and identity increasingly play an important part in our everyday lives is ludicrous. One rule for all.

You gave a tonedeaf comparison comparing the KKK hood to the burkha and little else.

If there's been that many reports of terrorists escaping in the west due to use of a burkha then why haven't you been able to link us to one? You were asked to provide a story and you've failed to do so.