The clue is in the namee, 'human rights'. There's no wriggle room on it, any country that upholds human rights does so for everyone. Picking and choosing invalidates it AND risks setting a dangerous precedent that could be abused down the line.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad
British my foot! Do you truly and intelligently believe that nationality should be determined by simple geography and where someone happened to be born. That description is based on simplicity.
A true definition would be based on where one’s heart, loyalty and allegiances lie. Geography is nothing in comparison. It means very little and should carry no legal weight when it comes to such cases.
|
Legally, they are British and they are our problem to deal with. You are applying emotion to an issue of rights and law.
13-12-2017, 11:12 AM
Reply With Quote
Threaded Mode