[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

The clue is in the namee, 'human rights'. There's no wriggle room on it, any country that upholds human rights does so for everyone. Picking and choosing invalidates it AND risks setting a dangerous precedent that could be abused down the line.



Legally, they are British and they are our problem to deal with. You are applying emotion to an issue of rights and law.

And you will be quick to apply emotion when you post RIP to future victims of these terrorists. Personally I find that disturbing when you supported the ‘rights’ of the terrorists over the rights of the victims. You may choose not to see it that way, but that’s what it amounts to. As I said when people gets their priorities right - rights and laws can be reviewed and changed.

Human behaviour should determine humanity and the associated human rights - not an accident of birth. Most will rightly describe them as animals - and that is how they should be treated.