[Vicky.]

Do you have access to more information than the story you posted?

Again, enjoying sex with someone does not mean they cannot then rape you.

I actually can't make any sense of the polices decision to keep the messages until the last minute. Hoping more comes out about this as its just so confusing.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Do you have access to more information than the story you posted?

Again, enjoying sex with someone does not mean they cannot then rape you.

I actually can't make any sense of the polices decision to keep the messages until the last minute. Hoping more comes out about this as its just so confusing.

Trial collapsed when 40,000 messages revealed she pestered him for sex

You cant pester someone for sex then accuse them of rape

The texts revealed the woman asked Mr Allan for casual sex and fantasised about rough and violent intercourse and even being raped despite telling police she didn't like being intimate with men.


Yet another hole in the case

Barrister Jerry Hayes claims the detective in charge told him sexual messages sent by the woman to Liam Allan and her friends were 'too personal' to share.

Too Personal?

[Firewire]

Originally Posted by QueenOfSheba

You cant pester someone for sex then accuse them of rape

You can if you were raped.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Snowire

You can if you were raped.

I agree although in this case it seems that she pestered him for sex after the encounter that she later reported as rape.

It's a little unclear but that's definitely what the articles are implying.