[Withano]

Originally Posted by Paula D

If you care to look back at my posting history from previous series I think you'll find I've never had a problem with LBGT issues, still don't.

What I do have a problem with is Shane J and his vicious sly carry on.

I also have a problem with gay people being thrown out of the "club" for not being the right sort of gay.

Kind of ironic that John B got crucified for even making a joke about a club when Amanda can be dismissed just because she happens to not like Shane J.

Also, there are gay people in here also ashamed of this carry on but it's convenient for you just to ignore them isn't it? Are they not allowed to have LGBT issues because there not the same as your issues.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

None of that is a defence? Some people are getting visibly agitated in every single lgbt thread, thats just a fact.

[Marches]

Originally Posted by Withano

None of that is a defence? Some people are getting visibly agitated in every single lgbt thread, thats just a fact.

Because we’re sick of the culty movements that are not needed in the first world and the 373847383 labels

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Marches

Because we’re sick of the culty movements that are not needed in the first world and the 373847383 labels

I'm happy to acknowledge whatever reason anybody gives for being visibly agitated over an lgbt thread, I just think they should probably be aware how it comes across without their excuses.

[Paula D]

Originally Posted by Withano

None of that is a defence? Some people are getting visibly agitated in every single lgbt thread, thats just a fact.

I don't need a defence. Haven't done a thing wrong.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Paula D

I don't need a defence. Haven't done a thing wrong.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

Oh sorry, I missed the point of your response, what was that supposed to be if not a defence?

[Paula D]

Originally Posted by Withano

Oh sorry, I missed the point of your response, what was that supposed to be if not a defence?

It was a query as to why you think it's acceptable to dismiss some gay people because they don't live in the hate filled world you do, that's all.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Paula D

It was a query as to why you think it's acceptable to dismiss some gay people because they don't live in the hate filled world you do, that's all.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

I have no idea what you're going on about anymore. Are you tired?

[Paula D]

Originally Posted by Withano

I have no idea what you're going on about anymore. Are you tired?

Not at all. If you can't answer the question that's fine, don't worry son.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Paula D

Not at all. If you can't answer the question that's fine, don't worry son.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

I dont live in a hate-filled world, i find that question completely bizarre coming from you. You come across as quite arguably, the angriest members on tibb atm, sure its only when lgbt is mentioned, but irony of implying i live in a hate-filled world when your response to equality can be summarised by the word 'negative' is just ridic. So ridic that I refuse to take you seriously. Maybe you can rephrase the question so that it seems thought-out on some level?