[Josy]

Originally Posted by jet

That is nothing to do with what is being asked. I just want an answer to this question as do others:

So in future, the rules are that if a politician or party is being discussed in a critical way, using inflammatory language, it isn't allowed to bring another into it for comparison purposes as they have no relevance and the people should just suck up the inflammatory language, is that right?
Sounds like a blog to me with the comments section closed.

Originally Posted by Brillopad

You have explained nothing - just attempted to justify your biased modding. It as controlling as any politician I have seen on either side. Those in glass houses and all that.

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Tbh honest Vicky I fail to see how the mention of Corbyn in that thread can be described as derailing the thread as it was pretty obvious it was Corbyn supporters who attacked Mogg - so it seems very relevant to me.

It also seems obvious to me that some mods are more able than others to stop their personal opinions from affecting how they react to certain topics. The accusations of derailing the thread are increasing ten-fold and also appear to be a convenient shut-down tactic to me.

So im a bit late commenting on this but completely agree with both Dezzy and Vickys opinion on the derailment of threads with all the Corbyn stuff and its seemingly the same posters that are guilty of this, it needs to stop and these sort of comments that are designed to derail threads will be removed and the posters will be infracted if they continue to do it, no its not censorship its us trying our best to stop threads constantly going off topic and descending into the same old arguments.