[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Let's face it, if we had some way of ensuring impartiality, ALL cases would be better tried by panels of experts rather than random laypeople. The jury system is deeply flawed and far too often comes down to "who has the more experienced and more convincing representation".

Who would these rape experts be?
Does evidence of physical assault count as nothing then, she was bleeding everywhere for a start now to my mind that's a convincing representation of rape.
She was described as 'hysterical' by a taxi driver, She the next morning stated she had been raped and the encounter she had was not consensual.

My theory is that this meritocracy we live in has diverged into the justice system.