Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster
Am I the only one who feels that this momentous development would NOT be happening without Trump's part in the way he reacted to 'Kim Not So Nice But Dim'?
|
IF he's being genuine (I think we have to keep in mind that NK isn't above faking it) then, technically, yes I think Trump is to credit... Although from what's being said, it's not so much down to negotiating tactics or skill... I think he's simply out-crazied Kim Jong / called his bluff successfully.
That is to say... Kim Jong knows fine well that NK couldn't win a nuclear standoff with the US and always has... But he actually believes that Trump is mad enough to go ahead and press the button (or mount an invasion of NK) and he's backing down.
I wonder, is that luck or skill on Trump's part? Is he also just bluffing with his apparent "instability" because he WANTS opponents to believe it?
Either way I'd say a risky tactic has paid off. He accurately gambled that Kim Jong would "blink first" so to speak, because Kim is more of a troll than an actual madman. If it had turned out to be the latter, it could be a very different outcome.