[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

That doesn't really matter though. Like I said - I fully understand why many people think that a second vote is unwarranted and unnecessary. I understand the government's inclination to hold their ground and not hold such a vote.

However, if there WAS a vote, so long as it is an open public vote, and the result is a true reflection of how genuine voters have voted... then there's just no way it can be described as "undemocratic".

For example; there was no reason at all for May to hold a General Election last summer. No one wanted it... it was a total waste of time... and the result ended up doing nothing but further muddy the waters. However... that doesn't mean that the result was undemocratic.

People are being deceived and misinformed by those having the the nerve to claim people were deceived and misinformed prior to the original vote. We are simply going around in circles and a second vote would be no more ‘honest and enlightened’ than the first. That in my book would make it undemocratic - because some will have given in to the constant fear-mongering by many. That is not an informed decision.