FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Chat General discussion. Want to chat about anything not covered in another forum - This is the place! |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Bankys Film
in his own Warren Type Cinema set up in London. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
Altar Ego
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
Altar Ego
|
Quote:
So on what grounds is the picture in question not art then? Was there no collaboration between god and the artist on that one? How do you know this? |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Altar Ego
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
Too glam to give a damn
|
I find it all attractive to look at.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
I think the majority of 'modern art' is crap...I mean, anyone can go out and stick a shoe on top of a plant pot and pass it off as art (which is basically what a LOT of the modern stuff is). But if people want to waste money on it, its up to them.
Anything can be considered art...just depends what your interpretation of 'art' is really... |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
|
||||
Nothing in excess
|
An exaggeration I think. Here is some great modern art and literature.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off? - Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis Last edited by BB_Eye; 02-03-2010 at 06:58 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |||
|
||||
Nothing in excess
|
You haven't exactly gone into great detail about why you created this thread in the first place.
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off? - Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |||
|
||||
Altar Ego
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||
|
||||
Nothing in excess
|
Why are Rothko, Breton, Bacon and Picasso not crap? Well apart from the fact that they have given me great enjoyment, I think it's only fair we give more recent works of art the benefit of the doubt and let them stand the test of time. Maybe I would expand on this, but I don't think I am obliged to explain myself when you have remained intentionally vague.
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off? - Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|