[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Ross

All women need to **** off.

Spoiler:

[Braden]

Originally Posted by Enid

Well tbh, that really is nobody's business but their own, but because so many people become so emotionally involved in this forum and form bonds, when someone is caught out to be someone they're not, it's an act of mistrust. I don't like it when people go out of their way to steal pictures and create a whole new character to gain friendship and attention because it's dodgy as hell, but when someone uses a different name and says they are from another location on a FORUM, that isn't ban worthy.

That's what I mean,people who use other peoples pictures are just ew.

[InOne]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

We would have no members left..

Not really, it would stop people acting up. They do it cos they know it won't be forever.

[Ross]

Niamh can stay because she can fetch me the naked boys... I mean men.

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by Braden

Anyone that lies about their identity should **** cept lucy.

So you want a rule but it shouldn't apply to folk you like?

What tosh.

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by Braden

That's what I mean,people who use other peoples pictures are just ew.

Except Lucy, right? *rolls eyes*

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by Braden

That's what I mean,people who use other peoples pictures are just ew.

Isn't it illegal.... using someone's pictures and saying you are that person.... a few people on this forum could get sued.

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by Braden

Anyone that lies about their identity should **** cept lucy.

It depends on their reasons - you can't just say anyone except one person!

[Beastie]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

It depends on their reasons - you can't just say anyone except one person!

This.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Ross

Niamh can stay because she can fetch me the naked boys... I mean men.

I can take them for a test drive for you first too Ross

[Ross]

Originally Posted by Niamhxo

I can take them for a test drive for you first too Ross

No. I will kill you.

[Jayson]

*slaps Braden*

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Ross

No. I will kill you.

Spoiler:

[Braden]

Hmmm I know, but I love lucy, so I feel bad for categorizing her. I apologize.

And Jayson, I said I was sorry

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by Jack_

This, but Over 16's instead.

And I would implement an archive of all the classic threads, so that people can still view them, just not post in them.

Then the 14s will say, but over 14s instead - etc! As soon as you reach 18 - you will say over 18s too - bet ya boots!

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Braden

Hmmm I know, but I love lucy, so I feel bad for categorizing her. I apologize.

And Jayson, I said I was sorry

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

Then the 14s will say, but over 14s instead - etc! As soon as you reach 18 - you will say over 18s too - bet ya boots!

I'm 15

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by Jack_

I'm 15

If they changed it to 16 now for bb - you wouldn't be happy!

[Braden]

rofl niamh, my mum loved that show back in her hayday.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

If they changed it to 16 now for bb - you wouldn't be happy!

And people who could pass for 16...

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by Jack_

I was right first time then!

And besides you can't have an age limit that specifies people that could pass for that age - that's ridiculous - lots of people think that about themselves doesn't make it true! Either they are or they aren't! Simples!

[Stu]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

I was right first time then!

And besides you can't have an age limit that specifies people that could pass for that age - that's ridiculous - lots of people think that about themselves doesn't make it true! Either they are or they aren't! Simples!

No it's not riddiculous. It makes perfect sense. If you can pass for 16/18 to the extent that nobody found out you were younger, then you are obviously mature enough to meet the minimum level of maturity that the admins and mods of a forum want to maintain.

It makes perfect sense.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

I was right first time then!

And besides you can't have an age limit that specifies people that could pass for that age - that's ridiculous - lots of people think that about themselves doesn't make it true! Either they are or they aren't! Simples!

No you weren't, I was pointing out that I said I'd agree to an Over 16's restriction, but one that allowed people who acted 16+ to pass.

You were assuming that everyone that was an age [say 14] would say 'I think it should be 14+', so I was pointing out that you were wrong.

And of course you can.

If most people assume/believe that someone is older than they really are, or act older than they really are, then how else would they know otherwise?

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

I was right first time then!

And besides you can't have an age limit that specifies people that could pass for that age - that's ridiculous - lots of people think that about themselves doesn't make it true! Either they are or they aren't! Simples!

Nah.. if the forum was 16+, we have no way of actually knowing if a member is 16 or not. But there would be less rules as officially the forum does not allow children. So if they could pass for 16, nothing we could do about it really...no way of knowing.

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by Jack_

No you weren't, I was pointing out that I said I'd agree to an Over 16's restriction, but one that allowed people who acted 16+ to pass.

You were assuming that everyone that was an age [say 14] would say 'I think it should be 14+', so I was pointing out that you were wrong.

And of course you can.

If most people assume/believe that someone is older than they really are, or act older than they really are, then how else would they know otherwise?

You said over 16s because you think you could pass for that - so that you would be allowed on the forum! I was pointing out that that was very self-serving of you - that 13/14 year-olds would say 14+ so that they could access the forum! Your first comment that said you were 15 implied I was wrong because you weren't 16 and therefore not looking after your own interests - but I wasn't wrong because you think you would pass for 16 - so therefore you were looking after your own interests! That's all I was saying!