| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| View Poll Results: Hai | ||||||
| Yes |
|
29 | 72.50% | |||
|
||||||
| No |
|
8 | 20.00% | |||
|
||||||
| Don't know |
|
3 | 7.50% | |||
|
||||||
| Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll | ||||||
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
Had to pick up on the above though to avoid spread of misinformation. There is a common misconception in the UK that abortion is legal - abortion is categorically NOT legal. Abortion is an illegal act, that is carried out in a manner similar to the laws of justifiable homicide. It is absolutely NOT a woman's choice to abort, as the permission of two medical practitioners is required, and they by law are only supposed to give permission for an abortion if they feel that the woman is likely to suffer either physical or mental harm as a result of following through with the pregnancy, or if the future child can be shown to likely have an impairment serious enough that it would have a very poor quality of life. If two practitioners do NOT approve the action then an abortion would be an illegal act, it's just that it's become common practice similar to doctors prescribing various drugs at the drop of a hat to give permission because a woman says she wants to abort. Now I'm not saying anything whatsoever about my own personal opinions in the above, actually I think abortion issues should be on a case by case basis, but that is in fact the legal position. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
The two practitioner agreement is simply a rubber stamp job nowadays. Your GP referring you to a clinic is approval and the acceptance to carry out the abortion by the clinic is the second. Bearing in mind a doctors hands are pretty much tied in that if a doctor wont refer they have to direct the seeker to a doctor who will. If someone goes directly to the clinic it is even less valid in that you will be interviewed by a doctor and the second doctor may be the practitioner prescribing the drugs. In some cases, it will simply be a rubber stamp from a second doctor involved with the clinic. Last edited by Shasown; 16-06-2010 at 12:41 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Yes. Defiantly. There is no good argument not to legalise them in my opinion
|
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
|||
|
0_o
|
I really don't see the problem with it to be honest.
As long as people aren't forced into it obviously. |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
Altar Ego
|
I wish we could see who voted no. I wonder what business is it of theirs who does what behind closed doors with consent.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Niamh | Hands off my Brick!
|
I'd actually be interested to know what their reasons for voting no are too. Everyone who posted seems to think they should be legalized
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
Altar Ego
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
|||
|
oh fack off
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
|||
|
Banned
|
If you legalise it then you can put regulations and such in place to protect the people involved in it while as if it stays illegal people will be forced into it and such.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
||||
|
Altar Ego
|
*takes a seat*
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
|||
|
0_o
|
Again?!
Every bloody thread ends up like this these days... |
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|