[-Sue-]

Originally Posted by redonthehead

Hes an unstable bully

Katie H is yes..

Perez maybe a nutter but he is not evil unless poked with a stick then those that dish it deserve it!

[-Sue-]

Just a reminder Katie H was NEVER given a warning for breaking BB property (when she broke his rabbit) double standards anyone?

[poppsywoppsy]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

Perez has endured Katie H and her barrage of nasty comments since Alex left - everyday endlessly! *sigh*

He goad's teases but is NO WHERE near as nasty as Katie at all (in the house) Perez can't breathe in and out without Katie H wishing some evil downfall on him..or commenting on everything he does..says.. how he sits.. what he wears.. she has even voiced her vile hate towards people that like him! (surely that's their choice? whom they talk to)

Can't you see that this reaction towards him is totally due to his own faults.

He goaded so many times, he deserves his own treatment back.

Just because he thinks now he is going to ignore this treatment, it doesn't make him blameless or it should stop.

It is done to let him know he doesn't have the upper hand, he doesn't rule the show and in his own words, if he doesn't like it, Leave.

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

Katie H is yes..

Perez maybe a nutter but he is not evil unless poked with a stick then those that dish it deserve it!

She deserves some payback. About time and all!

[-Sue-]

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

Can't you see that this reaction towards him is totally due to his own faults.

He goaded so many times, he deserves his own treatment back.

Just because he thinks now he is going to ignore this treatment, it doesn't make him blameless or it should stop.

It is done to let him know he doesn't have the upper hand, he doesn't rule the show and in his own words, if he doesn't like it, Leave.

Goad yes.. but doesn't mean they have to react in such a way! Laugh it off have a quiet word with him.. there is no need to poke fun at him ridicule him at any given opportunity infront of whole house.. that is what I don't understand Katie H says she is all for 'free speech' etc but yet instead of sitting down talking to him she ridicules with vile patronising awful comments..

[poppsywoppsy]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

Katie H is yes..

Perez maybe a nutter but he is not evil unless poked with a stick then those that dish it deserve it!

I think he is quite unstable. He looks exhausted, his mind runs at double/treble that of others, plotting scheming, he is hyper all the time.

If he is quiet, that means there is trouble ahead.

[Jules2]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

Just a reminder Katie H was NEVER given a warning for breaking BB property (when she broke his rabbit) double standards anyone?

PEREZ has never been givien a warning for anything at all and look at all the evil things he has done. The worse things are insulting the wall and viewers eyes. BOTS making pathetic excuses for him..........Where is your decency Emma? I am willing to bet she is having a lot of backchat from viewers.

[reality]

I admit that I might be biased because I much prefer Katie Hopkins (something I never thought I would say) to Perez because her version of entertaining at least shows a level of intelligence and wit, although she can go too far sometimes.
Lets be honest though, neither of them have behaved perfectly, and we wouldn't want them to, but it frustrates me when people dress up Perez's behaviour as though he's some kind of martyr.
They have both dished it out, and they are both getting it back to a certain extent. I think the fact the Katie is only abusive to him is 6 of one and half a dozen of the other, you could see it as bullying one person, or you could look at it from the viewpoint that he has wound up and goaded everybody (apart from one person).
The main thing that I'm trying to say is, biases aside; Katie Hopkins hasn't had people walk from the house as a consequence of her actions. And even more importantly; Katie isn't being given the option of a vote for immunity, only Perez is being granted that privilege. Even if it was somebody I liked being given that option, I still wouldn't agree with it.
I don't necessarily want Perez to go yet, but I think that we should be given the option of whether or not to save him when he is up for eviction. BB have already protected him from this round of nominations. I'm starting to suspect that "making the final/winning" was signed into his contract based on the obvious preferential treatment he has received from BB.

[-Sue-]

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

I think he is quite unstable. He looks exhausted, his mind runs at double/treble that of others, plotting scheming, he is hyper all the time.

If he is quiet, that means there is trouble ahead.

Well thats probably a combination of things new environment.. someone snores & can't sleep.. things on his mind.. missing home etc...it has to be insanely stressful being in there and ontop of that (despite saying he doesn't care I'm sure he does a little) being 'hated' all day long by Katie H Michelle Cami etc those comments rattle round your head...

[poppsywoppsy]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

Goad yes.. but doesn't mean they have to react in such a way! Laugh it off have a quiet word with him.. there is no need to poke fun at him ridicule him at any given opportunity infront of whole house.. that is what I don't understand Katie H says she is all for 'free speech' etc but yet instead of sitting down talking to him she ridicules with vile patronising awful comments..

They couldn't laugh it off, it was done with intent to mock, goad and intentionally upset everybody in the house.

He got rid of a decent man by the most destructive goading, by sexually waggling his tongue at a elderly straight man and by calling people racist and homophobic.

You don't laugh at that off.

[-Sue-]

Originally Posted by Jules2

PEREZ has never been givien a warning for anything at all and look at all the evil things he has done. The worse things are insulting the wall and viewers eyes. BOTS making pathetic excuses for him..........Where is your decency Emma? I am willing to bet she is having a lot of backchat from viewers.

What would he get a warning for ?? waving at a window? humping a window/chair? walking round in pants? breathing?

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Jules2

PEREZ has never been givien a warning for anything at all and look at all the evil things he has done. The worse things are insulting the wall and viewers eyes. BOTS making pathetic excuses for him..........Where is your decency Emma? I am willing to bet she is having a lot of backchat from viewers.

[Jules2]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

Goad yes.. but doesn't mean they have to react in such a way! Laugh it off have a quiet word with him.. there is no need to poke fun at him ridicule him at any given opportunity infront of whole house.. that is what I don't understand Katie H says she is all for 'free speech' etc but yet instead of sitting down talking to him she ridicules with vile patronising awful comments..

Nadia is supposed to have tried this, it hasnt worked has it, he knows they all dislike him but he doesnt care he does it on purpose. Every little thing Katie has said has been the truth, an overview of what he has done. It was interesting to see that the only two who nominated Katie were Nadia and Patsy, Perez' buddies, all others went for Patsy and Nadia. Says a lot.

[poppsywoppsy]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

Well thats probably a combination of things new environment.. someone snores & can't sleep.. things on his mind.. missing home etc...it has to be insanely stressful being in there and ontop of that (despite saying he doesn't care I'm sure he does a little) being 'hated' all day long by Katie H Michelle Cami etc those comments rattle round your head...

All brought about by his own vile behaviour.

If he can't take it back, don't dish it out.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

What would he get a warning for ?? waving at a window? humping a window/chair? walking round in pants? breathing?

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

What would he get a warning for ?? waving at a window? humping a window/chair? walking round in pants? breathing?

Alex already said he was not allowed to breathe.

[-Sue-]

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

They couldn't laugh it off, it was done with intent to mock, goad and intentionally upset everybody in the house.

He got rid of a decent man by the most destructive goading, by sexually waggling his tongue at a elderly straight man and by calling people racist and homophobic.

You don't laugh at that off.

Alex was a grown man if he did not like being looked at how did he manage during his concerts? (remembers the word Alex called Perez)

[reality]

I agree, I feel let down by Emma, she was a die-hard BB fan, she probably disagrees with it herself but is just taking orders :-/

[poppsywoppsy]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

What would he get a warning for ?? waving at a window? humping a window/chair? walking round in pants? breathing?

Calling people homophobic, racist in order to get them removed.

He humped at the window sexually, not waved and simulated climax.

And on and on

[-Sue-]

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

All brought about by his own vile behaviour.

If he can't take it back, don't dish it out.

I admit some things make me go ew.. but at the same time.. I am blessed with a sense of humour and able to laugh off the silliness..

But i am sorry I can't laugh or support Katie H who is about as much fun as cleaning the loo! I can't support hate of that kind..she has gone too far imo!

[poppsywoppsy]

Originally Posted by -Sue-

Alex was a grown man if he did not like being looked at how did he manage during his concerts? (remembers the word Alex called Perez)

Absolutely, Alex got a warning

Perez gets away with it.

[Jack The Cat]

To answer the OP, money, the Perez/Katie combination has increased the ratings which equal money.

BB will make more money by having both of them as the final two. I have noticed the edit favours one of them one night and the other one the next.

BB has played the public for a fool, not Perez or Katie.

[reality]

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

Calling people homophobic, racist in order to get them removed.

He humped at the window sexually, not waved and simulated climax.

And on and on

Exactly! He just uses the rule book and his interpretation of it in order to get others in trouble even when he displays the exact kind of behaviour he is accusing others of!

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

To answer the OP, money, the Perez/Katie combination has increased the ratings which equal money.

BB will make more money by having both of them as the final two. I have noticed the edit favours one of them one night and the other one the next.

BB has played the public for a fool, not Perez or Katie.

I agree. they want both in the final.

[Jules2]

Originally Posted by reality

I admit that I might be biased because I much prefer Katie Hopkins (something I never thought I would say) to Perez because her version of entertaining at least shows a level of intelligence and wit, although she can go too far sometimes.
Lets be honest though, neither of them have behaved perfectly, and we wouldn't want them to, but it frustrates me when people dress up Perez's behaviour as though he's some kind of martyr.
They have both dished it out, and they are both getting it back to a certain extent. I think the fact the Katie is only abusive to him is 6 of one and half a dozen of the other, you could see it as bullying one person, or you could look at it from the viewpoint that he has wound up and goaded everybody (apart from one person).
The main thing that I'm trying to say is, biases aside; Katie Hopkins hasn't had people walk from the house as a consequence of her actions. And even more importantly; Katie isn't being given the option of a vote for immunity, only Perez is being granted that privilege. Even if it was somebody I liked being given that option, I still wouldn't agree with it.
I don't necessarily want Perez to go yet, but I think that we should be given the option of whether or not to save him when he is up for eviction. BB have already protected him from this round of nominations. I'm starting to suspect that "making the final/winning" was signed into his contract based on the obvious preferential treatment he has received from BB.

A good post one of which I would agree with, how could he possibly have got away with the things he has? His language especially in the DR. Katie is at the moment tipped to win he has gone down a peg or two with Nadia increasing her lead. Look what it has done for her without him. Katie won the most entertaining award from the public he got the most unhygenic. I would fear for his child tbh in this country he would have to account for his actions.