[hot2go]

Originally Posted by Speedster

Either way, he doesn't sound that good a dad. Wonder he was accused on here of being a bad father....

Accused of being a bad father by who ? The same people who think Lateysha is a good mother ?

Oh it do make me larf Sometimes I think my jeans will never dry out

[Speedster]

Originally Posted by hot2go

Accused of being a bad father by who ? The same people who think Lateysha is a good mother ?

Oh it do make me larf Sometimes I think my jeans will never dry out

I'm so glad I amuse you.

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Single dad? Erm...doesn't the mother have the kid all of the time except a weekend every fortnight? I don't think that really qualifies him as a single dad tbh

I do get the point though

His situation is a tad different

[Withano]

Lateyshas time in the house was unfairly taken away, voted out by the public is not unfair at all. Lateysha was a single mum, Jackson pays child support to the single mum. Lateysha was a nice girl, Jackson is a horrid twat. Youve tried to force similarities into things which are completely different in an attempt to call lots of people hypocrites, when really, no. The two situations are completely different.

[hot2go]

Originally Posted by Withano

Lateyshas time in the house was unfairly taken away, voted out by the public is not unfair at all. Lateysha was a single mum, Jackson pays child support to the single mum. Lateysha was a nice girl, Jackson is a horrid twat. Youve tried to force similarities into things which are completely different in an attempt to call lots of people hypocrites, when really, no. The two situations are completely different.

The two situations are the same ....they are both young parents who want to make a better future for their children....personally I don't ever consider that a valid reason to give housemates immunity but then I'm not the one who went around saying it should be. If it was a valid reason for keeping Lateysha then it should be the same valid reason for keeping Jackson. Myself I would have pressed the same button as Jason did and thrown Jackson out the same door that silly cow went through. You think Jacksons child is less deserving than Lateysha child based on the principle that you don't like him. WELL Jason didn't like Lateysha and neither did loads of us on here so I really see no difference at all.
It seems to me that Jason wasn't allowed to dislike Lateysha but you are allowed to dislike Jackson.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by hot2go

The two situations are the same ....they are both young parents who want to make a better future for their children....personally I don't ever consider that a valid reason to give housemates immunity but then I'm not the one who went around saying it should be. If it was a valid reason for keeping Lateysha then it should be the same valid reason for keeping Jackson. Myself I would have pressed the same button as Jason did and thrown Jackson out the same door that silly cow went through. You think Jacksons child is less deserving than Lateysha child based on the principle that you don't like him. WELL Jason didn't like Lateysha and neither did loads of us on here so I really see no difference at all.
It seems to me that Jason wasn't allowed to dislike Lateysha but you are allowed to dislike Jackson.

I dont really care for either of them, you made the assumption that i like lateysha because you didnt like the answer i gave. Which is just a bit silly and forces your argument to a close.

One man ending one persons time in the house is not the same as the british publuc ending one persons time in the house. This is obvious (lol)

Theyre both parents and thats the only similarity. One was unjustly removed from the house and one will be fairly voted out. The housemates and the public will not care for Jacksons eviction because of the way it was fairly done.

[hot2go]

Originally Posted by Withano

I dont really care for either of them, you made the assumption that i like lateysha because you didnt like the answer i gave. Which is just a bit silly and forces your argument to a close.

One man ending one persons time in the house is not the same as the british publuc ending one persons time in the house. This is obvious (lol)

Theyre both parents and thats the only similarity. One was unjustly removed from the house and one will be fairly voted out. The housemates and the public will not care for Jacksons eviction because of the way it was fairly done.

Some of the housemates thought Lateysha deserved to win and their reason was because she's got a small child. That reason was obv not true and they were being fake...those housemates were Ryan. Sam, Hughie and Jayne.

The difference in the way Lateysha and Jackson left / will leave the house isn't relevant to my point...some of those housemates were saying that she deserved to stay well before she lost her place in the house and their reason was because she has a child. So why not think the same about Jackson and his child.

My mistake in thinking you liked Lateysha makes my assumption about you wrong but it doesn't force my argument to a close at all.

Jason was given hell for the fact she has a child so why aren't the people who nominated Jackson given hell for same reason and esp Sam who had a chance to save him two nights ago and didn't.

Hypocrites and fake is what they are.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by hot2go

Some of the housemates thought Lateysha deserved to win and their reason was because she's got a small child. That reason was obv not true and they were being fake...those housemates were Ryan. Sam, Hughie and Jayne.

The difference in the way Lateysha and Jackson left / will leave the house isn't relevant to my point...some of those housemates were saying that she deserved to stay well before she lost her place in the house and their reason was because she has a child. So why not think the same about Jackson and his child.

My mistake in thinking you liked Lateysha makes my assumption about you wrong but it doesn't force my argument to a close at all.

Jason was given hell for the fact she has a child so why aren't the people who nominated Jackson given hell for same reason and esp Sam who had a chance to save him two nights ago and didn't.

Hypocrites and fake is what they are.

Yes the way Lateysha left is completely relevant, not only relevant, its the key factor.

Obviously if Lateysha was voted out by the public, people wouldnt have reacted in the way they did. Lateysha was unfairly eliminated as it was decided entirely by one person.

I dont know why you cant see the difference between one man and a couple thousand paying customers. I really cant.

Other people can, other people see the huge difference and it would not make them hypocrites for acting differently because they can see this huge difference, the huge difference will make them react differently. Because obviously.

I typed all this but im getting the impression you only made this thread to tell people that you're right and Jason is awesome and you didnt actually make it for a discussion at all. You should probably avoid putting questions in your titles if youre not open to answers

[sungrass]

Jackson has to go. It would be just a great eviction. I want to see the Georgina thing - the group being shocked at the result - what accent he will use in his interview!

[chuff me dizzy]

I really don't care as long as he goes

[Maru]

Wonder which accent he will do his exit interview in...?

[Liam-]

Here for Alex blubbing into a dirty cocktail if Jackson is evicted.

[Rook]

Originally Posted by sassyfox

Nah, think they'll be shocked because they think he's a favourite.

Unlike Lateysha, the show is not raising his current 'celeb' profile or advertising his book. Plus it's literally the last few days of the show. So it's not the same loss of exposure.

Wait he has a book ?