[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Elliot

If anyone else would have done this the Lewis fans would’ve been labelling them as selfish and horrible. Works both ways !!

Why is anyone selfish and horrible for jumping in the pool, and breaking the rules ?,whoever had done it would have been different from the normal game playing talk I have known housemates break rules before but because they are a fave it's all ok,the double standards here are hilarious.

[Elliot]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Why is anyone selfish and horrible for jumping in the pool, and breaking the rules ?,whoever had done it would have been different from the normal game playing talk I have known housemates break rules before but because they are a fave it's all ok,the double standards here are hilarious.

Exactly and I would’ve loved to see certian people’s reaction if Hussain or akeem would’ve done this

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Elliot

Exactly and I would’ve loved to see certian people’s reaction if Hussain or akeem would’ve done this

But they didn't did they so that is irrelevant,.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Elliot

Exactly and I would’ve loved to see certian people’s reaction if Hussain or akeem would’ve done this

It simply wouldn't bother me....because at the end of the day they get called out for it in front of the other housemates....rule breaks happen year in and year out. By the looks of it the other housemates found it amusing. The only one who looked miffed was Tomasz...but he wont miss hot water or a hair dryer...

I don't know why people are bothered...the housemates aren't ...but its just another excuse for a Lewis rant..
Never mind...we all love talking about him don't we.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Elliot

If anyone else would have done this the Lewis fans would’ve been labelling them as selfish and horrible. Works both ways !!

so is that your reasons for doing it with lewis then?

[Amy Jade]

I didn't think it was rebelious at all just immature and showed he has no respect for rules.

The first just I forgave because it was just an excitable spur of the moment but after BB warned him and he did it again I just thought he was an idiot and then him in the diary room I just cringed at, he's almost 30 ffs get a grip

[rionablue]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

I didn't think it was rebelious at all just immature and showed he has no respect for rules.

The first just I forgave because it was just an excitable spur of the moment but after BB warned him and he did it again I just thought he was an idiot and then him in the diary room I just cringed at, he's almost 30 ffs get a grip

Agreed

[mr rochester]

I don’t think Production thought through the scenario of what would happen if a housemate had zero coins.

Lewis is blatantly breaking all the rules because he has no coins and therefore does not think there will be any repercussions for his behaviour - especially about talking about nominations.

His behaviour is child like and attention seeking - it is the equivalent of ‘showing-off’.

[Garfie]

Originally Posted by mr rochester

I don’t think Production thought through the scenario of what would happen if a housemate had zero coins.

Lewis is blatantly breaking all the rules because he has no coins and therefore does not think there will be any repercussions for his behaviour - especially about talking about nominations.

His behaviour is child like and attention seeking - it is the equivalent of ‘showing-off’.

Yes, I don't think he could be described as rebellious or legendary for his actions. Like you say it was almost showing off, along with sheer stubbornness and almost a sense of entitlement - that he is somehow above rules and can do what he wants with no consequence. I think this was a response to getting the killer nomination and being unable to do anything about it.

I don't know why he has the idea that as he has just a few coins there will be no repercussions. His actions lacked forethought in my opinion, as the removal of food is going to antagonise housemates and cause conflict which he will no doubt react badly to, just before he faces eviction.

[poppsywoppsy]

Originally Posted by Garfie

Yes, I don't think he could be described as rebellious or legendary for his actions. Like you say it was almost showing off, along with sheer stubbornness and almost a sense of entitlement - that he is somehow above rules and can do what he wants with no consequence. I think this was a response to getting the killer nomination and being unable to do anything about it.

I don't know why he has the idea that as he has just a few coins there will be no repercussions. His actions lacked forethought in my opinion, as the removal of food is going to antagonise housemates and cause conflict which he will no doubt react badly to, just before he faces eviction.

Good, just think how it will be for the viewers watching the fall out when they are on basic rations and no electricity.

Or would you prefer it all nicey, nicey, with Brooke braiding her hair and make up tutorials. Hussain and Isabella playing catch around the table, Akeem constantly telling that he is a nice bloke and Sian being her usual boring self filing her nails.

[Garfie]

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

Good, just think how it will be for the viewers watching the fall out when they are on basic rations and no electricity.

Or would you prefer it all nicey, nicey, with Brooke braiding her hair and make up tutorials. Hussain and Isabella playing catch around the table, Akeem constantly telling that he is a nice bloke and Sian being her usual boring self filing her nails.

I think you misunderstood what I was saying. I can't wait for the fall out and will enjoy watching it. My point was that Lewis hadn't thought of the consequences and that might be to his detriment if it all kicks off directly before he faces eviction.

I detect a hint of sarcasm in your second paragraph which is slightly disappointing.

[poppsywoppsy]

Originally Posted by Garfie

I think you misunderstood what I was saying. I can't wait for the fall out and will enjoy watching it. My point was that Lewis hadn't thought of the consequences and that might be to his detriment if it all kicks off directly before he faces eviction.

I detect a hint of sarcasm in your second paragraph which is slightly disappointing.

If everyone had second thoughts before doing things, you would get a house full of whom I wrote about in the second paragraph.

Perception of intentions can be different on written posts.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Garfie

Yes, I don't think he could be described as rebellious or legendary for his actions. Like you say it was almost showing off, along with sheer stubbornness and almost a sense of entitlement - that he is somehow above rules and can do what he wants with no consequence. I think this was a response to getting the killer nomination and being unable to do anything about it.

I don't know why he has the idea that as he has just a few coins there will be no repercussions. His actions lacked forethought in my opinion, as the removal of food is going to antagonise housemates and cause conflict which he will no doubt react badly to, just before he faces eviction.

[Elliot]

It’s been done before his game is tired and selfish

[Parmy]

but heavy petting is allowed, one rule for onew, another rule for others.

[Withano]

Neither

Drunk

[rionablue]

Originally Posted by Cherie

its one thing talking bout noms, its another thing entirely to ignore warnings that are for your own safety, if I saw a 10 year old doing that at a swimming pool I would say they were a spoiled brat

what do you think?

I think he was wrong. One warning should have been enough. There IS a huge safety issue here. He could have hit his head against the side of the pool and it could have had catastrophic consequences. Now all his housemates including his lovely best bud (not) Cameron will have no food or hot water over his STUPIDITY

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by rionablue

I think he was wrong. One warning should have been enough. There IS a huge safety issue here. He could have hit his head against the side of the pool and it could have had catastrophic consequences. Now all his housemates including his lovely best bud (not) Cameron will have no food or hot water over his STUPIDITY

no one will die because they have to go without stuff,they wont starve or dehydrate,it's been done before many times by BB, it's only a big deal because Lewis and Cameron did it.

[Jack_]

"Lewis and Cameron are so miserable UGH all they do is moan"

*Lewis and Cameron have fun outside in the pool*

"WHAT A CHILD! Idiot! Lewis should act his age!!"

You couldn't write it

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Jack_

"Lewis and Cameron are so miserable UGH all they do is moan"

*Lewis and Cameron have fun outside in the pool*

"WHAT A CHILD! Idiot! Lewis should act his age!!"

You couldn't write it

Exactly.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Jack_

"Lewis and Cameron are so miserable UGH all they do is moan"

*Lewis and Cameron have fun outside in the pool*

"WHAT A CHILD! Idiot! Lewis should act his age!!"

You couldn't write it

Summed up perfectly.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by Jack_

"Lewis and Cameron are so miserable UGH all they do is moan"

*Lewis and Cameron have fun outside in the pool*

"WHAT A CHILD! Idiot! Lewis should act his age!!"

You couldn't write it

If he hadn't defied BB warning him I would see your point but what I take issue with is his disregard for rules and general attitude.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

If he hadn't defied BB warning him I would see your point but what I take issue with is his disregard for rules and general attitude.

the fact that he was doing it purposely because he has no coins and couldn't be punished as well, I was disappointed they didn't stop him from nominating but then I guess they wouldn't have to the right people up

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Cherie

the fact that he was doing it purposely because he has no coins and couldn't be punished as well, I was disappointed they didn't stop him from nominating but then I guess they wouldn't have to the right people up

Not so at all.
If Lewis hadn't been able to nominate it would have been one vote less for Hussain but Hussain would still have been up since 4 others nomned him.

Lewis nomming Isabella had no effect, as Isabella is up because she was bottom of the viewers vote.

So had they not taken Lewis's nominations the result and those up would have been exactly the same.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

If he hadn't defied BB warning him I would see your point but what I take issue with is his disregard for rules and general attitude.

I mean it was obviously dangerous and he should've listened but it's his safety and his life, it's not for me to care about really

Rule breaking can be a good trait in housemates too, I'd rather that than them toeing the line the whole time