[Alf]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

So people are more angry at a woman for being preachy than a man molesting a minor?

We don't actually know he did do that, yet.

But no, I certainly would be more angry towards a child molester than a preachy woman. And I'd be equally as angry at anybody who knew about it and covered it up.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

all shes done is try to escape a lifestyle that she nor her husband wanted to be in...prince Andrew was best mates with a peado and is looking likely to be one himself yet the media are still more interested in painting Meghan as some sort of super villain

I agree with you 100% Amy Jade.

If I didn't know any better I'd think that the Media have targeted Meghan to make people forget about the investigation on Andrew.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

I agree with you 100% Amy Jade.

If I didn't know any better I'd think that the Media have targeted Meghan to make people forget about the investigation on Andrew.

Why would they do that? What would be the point? If we were talking about William, fair enough. But we're talking about Andrew. A minor royal, and not a very popular one.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Livia

Why would they do that? What would be the point? If we were talking about William, fair enough. But we're talking about Andrew. A minor royal, and not a very popular one.

He is still the Queen's Son, the Newspapers that are Royalists aren't gonna want to piss her off.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Livia

Why would they do that? What would be the point? If we were talking about William, fair enough. But we're talking about Andrew. A minor royal, and not a very popular one.

Andrew at harrys age was a major royal... he was in all the papers all the time, randy Andy they called him.

Its only since he got older and the company he kept changed the media lost focus on him ...for some reason.

[Liam-]

I wonder why, what ever could it be?

[Jake.]

Because Andrew isn’t a mixed race female from another country.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Jake.

Because Andrew isn’t a mixed race female from another country.

all 3 reasons in one sentence

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Jake.

Because Andrew isn’t a mixed race female from another country.

What a pointless comment to make during a debate.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Livia

What a pointless comment to make during a debate.

Pointless in what sense?

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by Jake.

Because Andrew isn’t a mixed race female from another country.

Lol this sums it truly up... but no people will pretend it's more than that to save face.

[Kizzy]

I don't know why as an actress she can't design clothes, as singers Kanye and Beyonce do it, I suppose anyone can if they have an interest.
And they are royal, stands to reason they would use that label.

[Jake.]

It’s my opinion. Practice what you preach, Livia.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Jake.

It’s my opinion. Practice what you preach, Livia.

Your opinion is that the UK is racist and Meghan only had a rough time because she's black. I think that's and massive generalisation and completely unfounded.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Livia

Your opinion is that the UK is racist and Meghan only had a rough time because she's black. I think that's and massive generalisation and completely unfounded.

Where did I say that the UK is racist? Not every person in the UK dislikes Meghan.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Jake.

Where did I say that the UK is racist? Not every person in the UK dislikes Meghan.

So what did you mean then, when you suggested Andrew is being let off in some way because Meghan is a mixed race female? You suggest that all the problems with Meghan are only perceived and only because she's mixed race. Huge simplification.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Livia

So what did you mean then, when you suggested Andrew is being let off in some way because Meghan is a mixed race female? You suggest that all the problems with Meghan are only perceived and only because she's mixed race. Huge simplification.

The question was “why is there more outrage at Meghan than Andrew”, and I believe what I said to be the case. Certain people haven’t liked Meghan from the moment she touched down and I feel the “outrage” directed at Harry and Meghan is moreso directed at her and I feel her background has played a huge part in that. Andrew is being let off far more than he should be because the right-wing papers and such are still focused on that “bitch” Meghan because they know it’s what riles their readers up.

[Twosugars]

Btw, they still are royal highnesses. The queen has not removed the title. They are not to use it but they still have it.

[Kizzy]

Isn't that all any royal is, tourist attractions... what do these 'duties' involve anyway? Waving, eating food sometimes.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Isn't that all any royal is, tourist attractions... what do these 'duties' involve anyway? Waving, eating food sometimes.

Of course. They don't rule the country anymore than you or I.

It's literally just being the "face" of the UK I would imagine. Representing us. Keeping relations going. But even that is ever dwindling.

[Marsh.]

That's not fair, you posted that after she posted the answers.

Worst pub quiz ever!!

[Kizzy]

Being woke... you forgot the wokeness.

Woke is the new black.

[Twosugars]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Being woke... you forgot the wokeness.

Woke is the new black.

Good point so 4) independent and woke

[Josy]

Meghan is female, Andrew isnt, that's about the jist of it.

Sad but true.

[Twosugars]

So we have a female, poc and foreign who knows her mind.

A perfect target for ALL kinds of bigotry. It'd be difficult to imagine a better target actually