[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

i wasnt talking about front page splashes, there is no actual news about him so no front pages but if you google you will see all the main papers have run stories about him mainly from the markle angle

If you can find a story worthy of a front page this week about him feel free and share because no editors can


and i say again no threads on tibb in over a year

Some still defended Andrew actually and didn't want to believe the allegations, but continue to bury your head in the sand .

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Some still defended Andrew actually and didn't want to believe the allegations, but continue to bury your head in the sand .

Like who?...Ghislane?

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Some still defended Andrew actually and didn't want to believe the allegations, but continue to bury your head in the sand .

Thats it though they are, allegations same with the MJ thing really, he was found not guilty but is still guilty in some peoples view, If Andrew is found not guilty it won't matter as he is already guilty to some ,and it will never change, I made the MJ connection as I know you defended him as I did,but we were about the only two.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

every national newspaper has run stories about him in the last week


tibb meanwhile dont make any threads about him in a year


tibb: why is NOONE talking about Prince Andrew????

I mean let's be frank. You're one of the most active posters in this part of tibb, why did you think it was important to post about the weird towel story but you don't make much of any comments about a peadophile?

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

I mean let's be frank. You're one of the most active posters in this part of tibb, why did you think it was important to post about the weird towel story but you don't make much of any comments about a peadophile?

Hmm what a puzzler I can't possibly think why

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

I mean let's be frank. You're one of the most active posters in this part of tibb, why did you think it was important to post about the weird towel story but you don't make much of any comments about a peadophile?

as TS said there is nothing to make a thread about

--------------------------------


Prince Andrew is probably guilty, looking at the evidence

4 replies of yes


pointless


unless you have another angle?

[bots]

my recollection from the press and those who commented on the interview etc on here were almost 100% that he was guilty. Given that, he is not on trial here, there is an ongoing investigation, should the press have a story everyday that everyone agrees with ... that he is guilty? That doesn't sell papers

M & H are speaking to the public/press every other day. If they want to be off the newspapers, don't shout out in public every day

[Jordan.]

Someone disgracing themselves doesn't stroke the fragile ego quite like tearing someone from grace.

[Beso]

Let's look at the positives.

The next king is a paedos brother, and his son sees him as his favourite uncle.(a probable father figure to harry, one could imagine?)

[MTVN]

Prince Andrew was the bigger scandal and it was treated as such in the media, I wouldn't agree at all that there has been more fuss made about Meghan

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Prince Andrew was the bigger scandal and it was treated as such in the media, I wouldn't agree at all that there has been more fuss made about Meghan

Meghan literally dominates every news and thread , though , it's like Andrew who ?

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Meghan literally dominates every news and thread , though , it's like Andrew who ?

That interview with Maitlis dominated the news for ages. I think its just because the biggest part of the Andrew story is now some time in the past and the Meghan interview is current, it feels like the latter is getting more focus when it's not really the case

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by MTVN

That interview with Maitlis dominated the news for ages. I think its just because the biggest part of the Andrew story is now some time in the past and the Meghan interview is current, it feels like the latter is getting more focus when it's not really the case

Exactly...in a nutshell.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Meghan literally dominates every news and thread , though , it's like Andrew who ?

Depends where you look. Many people are still taking about Andrew on a regular basis.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Alf

Depends where you look. Many people are still taking about Andrew on a regular basis.

Is that so

[Alf]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Meghan literally dominates every news and thread , though , it's like Andrew who ?

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Is that so

The Internet is a totally different World to the Mainstream media.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Meghan literally dominates every news and thread , though , it's like Andrew who ?

and believe it or not there is not much in the news about Jimmy Savile or Jack the Ripper, The Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand or Pol Pot


it must be a cover-up by the glitterati

[Beso]

Prince andrew is rhyming slang these days.

[thesheriff443]

People talk about what they are interested in.
If people are so interested in Andrew they should write to their mp about him.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

People talk about what they are interested in.
If people are so interested in Andrew they should write to their mp about him.

I wonder how many tibb members have?

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I wonder how many tibb members have?

Sweet. f a

[Alf]

What is the situation with Andrew?

As I understand it, so far there have been accusations against him and he denies them.

Not really too much go on, unless you want to presume him guilty without the whole facts?

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Alf

What is the situation with Andrew?

As I understand it, so far there have been accusations against him and he denies them.

Not really too much go on, unless you want to presume him guilty without the whole facts?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Alf

What is the situation with Andrew?

As I understand it, so far there have been accusations against him and he denies them.

Not really too much go on, unless you want to presume him guilty without the whole facts?

surely people would not do that?

the legal process must be adhered to?

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Alf

What is the situation with Andrew?

As I understand it, so far there have been accusations against him and he denies them.

Not really too much go on, unless you want to presume him guilty without the whole facts?

odd to see you suddenly caring for the facts when it isn't in relation to election rigging or a global pandemic.