FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16-05-2022, 01:31 PM | #26 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
....and what do you find shameful about William and Kate, Edward and Sophie, Princess Anne for example? |
||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 01:35 PM | #27 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 01:41 PM | #28 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
they are all elitist and over privileged. I would remove the lot of them in an instant. We still have the history which is what the tourists come for. The number of royal events that there are throughout the year pale into insignificance to the value of our history
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 01:49 PM | #29 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 01:49 PM | #30 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
Republicanism is still pretty niche in this country tbh and I don't see that changing simply because its not a priority for most people and no government is going to take the risk of proposing its abolition. I actually think the monarchy now is a lot more stable than it was a hundred years ago now that it's settled into its largely ceremonial role
It's not like this country is the only one with a royal family, several other European countries still have theirs and seem to manage just fine through periods of succession |
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 01:53 PM | #31 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Tbh I've never heard an argument in favour of abolishion which is stronger than "it is the current year". There's just no need.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 02:15 PM | #32 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
That said you may well be right - just because there's no particular passion for the monarchy, doesn't mean there's much of a drive to remove it either, if it's seen as inert. So maybe it will continue through sheer apathy . |
||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 02:21 PM | #33 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
i think Andrew did severe damage to the firm, i think M&H have created their own disquiet. I think people are being polite for now because of the queen, but if Andrew tries to raise his head again during Charles reign, it will be off to the tower
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 02:34 PM | #34 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 02:43 PM | #35 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
If Charles scales back the monarchy as has been suggested, it will be a popular move
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 03:01 PM | #36 | |||
|
||||
Right Flower
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 03:04 PM | #37 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
__________________
Spoiler: Last edited by Niamh.; 16-05-2022 at 03:05 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 03:10 PM | #38 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 03:18 PM | #39 | |||
|
||||
MVGGA
|
Quote:
While I don't agree with them booing him, they haven't done anything legally wrong.
__________________
I'm a sick bitch. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-05-2022, 03:54 PM | #40 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The monarchy has to live on for all our laws to stand...its either anarchy, or the rest of our lives are governed by some self entitled old men in Charles, then william.
Luckily for me, I've had 52 years of the most wonderful, dedicated grand old woman looking after us. Good luck to you millennials, but I guess it's what all your disrespectful arses deserve. Enjoy your 52 years. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|