[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

and the Razzie for "perched for dramz" goes to Morsh

[Cal.]

Don't really care

[T*]

The Razzies are tongue in cheek, anyone who says that it is a chance to insult people have obviously not seen it before. It's nothing malicious but a bit of banter and fun. I take a lot of insults seriously and over-react time to time but do I think comments in the razzies are a directed at me are an insult? No!

[Black Dagger]

I'm really over it all. If they happen they happen and I'll take part but whatevs.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I seem to get a warning daily for mildly commenting on a post so feck knows how this bird is gonna fly

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I seem to get a warning daily for mildly commenting on a post so feck knows how this bird is gonna fly

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

[Crimson Dynamo]

You just can't get the staff these days..

[Ninastar]

thing is, people tag team vote on these things, so its never really a view of the forum as a whole... just a view from a small group of people.

[T*]

Originally Posted by Ninastar

thing is, people tag team vote on these things, so its never really a view of the forum as a whole... just a view from a small group of people.

Don't be silly, the weaves are gone

[Tom4784]

I always enjoyed the Razzies, I thought they were fun and were often highlights of the year when it comes to Tibb. Most people took it in the intended spirit and most of the people that abused the Razzies aren't around to do so this time. If it was down to me I'd be willing to give it another go with an opt in system.

[lily.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I always enjoyed the Razzies, I thought they were fun and were often highlights of the year when it comes to Tibb. Most people took it in the intended spirit and most of the people that abused the Razzies aren't around to do so this time. If it was down to me I'd be willing to give it another go with an opt in system.

I agree that it should be 'opt in'.. then you're basically volunteering for a piss-take... and people won't volunteer for that unless they're genuinely up for it..

I'd opt-in... I already get dogs abuse on here and off anyway.. Most of it is in jest and the rest of it idgaf about anyway

[joeysteele]

Right off last year,I opted out and only then looked back at the thread once at the end to see who won what.
I was actually surprised and felt I had misjudged the event so I have voted yes and also I wouldn't opt out of it this time.

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Right off last year,I opted out and only then looked back at the thread once at the end to see who won what.
I was actually surprised and felt I had misjudged the event so I have voted yes and also I wouldn't opt out of it this time.

[Ramsay]

Matt

[Niamh.]

I really don't think it's what the forum needs atm after all the crap that's went on lately

[Glenn.]

Shut up neeve

[Livia]

I find it a little insulting that despite the majority being "for" it, and that there is a universal agreement of both an opt in, and that it will be light-hearted, the usual clouds of doom are already predicting a bloodbath.

Guess we'll just have to wait for Most Loved and get our laughs from the inevitable charm offensive.

[Calderyon]

Isn´t it Katherine actually?

But yeah, hello Kate!

[Vanessa]

I don't think it's a good idea, especially after what happened lately. We need something positive on the forum for a change.

[Shaun]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

I don't think it's a good idea, especially after what happened lately. We need something positive on the forum for a change.

See, you say this, but even the TiBB Awards threads have been locked before because of "negativity" and "drama", and that's a thread literally designed to reward members

I mean, this forum in recent months has seen mudslinging in topics over Coach Trip, violent video games and Helen winning Big Brother. The last Razzies I recall went perfectly finely by until Thomas_C came on to pretend to find the whole thing offensive. I think we all know how that turned out. (Sorry this whole argument is quite vague but, well, the threads are hidden/deleted so...)

Besides, the fact that the detractors of the Razzies (who were around when they happened) are in and out of bans all the time anyway, or mods who're obviously (and perfectly entitled to be) tired of actually moderating it, so it's just a bit rich that they're involved in said drama all the time but don't want any more of it.

Edit: btw, I'm all for the trimming down of the more sensitive 'awards' (like most argumentative, as you point out above), but is there really much room for friction with things like 'biggest fail' or 'biggest drama queen' or 'cringeworthiest moment'?

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Shaun

See, you say this, but even the TiBB Awards threads have been locked before because of "negativity" and "drama", and that's a thread literally designed to reward members

I mean, this forum in recent months has seen mudslinging in topics over Coach Trip, violent video games and Helen winning Big Brother. The last Razzies I recall went perfectly finely by until Thomas_C came on to pretend to find the whole thing offensive. I think we all know how that turned out. (Sorry this whole argument is quite vague but, well, the threads are hidden/deleted so...)

Besides, the fact that the detractors of the Razzies (who were around when they happened) are in and out of bans all the time anyway, or mods who're obviously (and perfectly entitled to be) tired of actually moderating it, so it's just a bit rich that they're involved in said drama all the time but don't want any more of it.

Edit: btw, I'm all for the trimming down of the more sensitive 'awards' (like most argumentative, as you point out above), but is there really much room for friction with things like 'biggest fail' or 'biggest drama queen' or 'cringeworthiest moment'?

I know, but with the banned members returning the razzies would inevitably be fun of arguments.

[Shaun]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

I know, but with the banned members returning the razzies would inevitably be fun of arguments.

That's true, maybe they could be forbidden from taking part (given the circumstances)?

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Shaun

Edit: btw, I'm all for the trimming down of the more sensitive 'awards' (like most argumentative, as you point out above), but is there really much room for friction with things like 'biggest fail' or 'biggest drama queen' or 'cringeworthiest moment'?

Tom coming for a clean sweep

[T*]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Tom coming for a clean sweep

Bitch