About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

unoino · 20-01-2015, 02:04 PM

The thread mentioned a sad day for hard working women...I dont class anyone who gets there kit off for papers or mags as hardworking..I class them as what they are sluts....to me there in the category of prostitutes escorts..lapdancers..pornstars ...I love them all but I certainly dont in anyway respect them .

Beso · 20-01-2015, 06:19 PM

I wonder how many men were in the toilet, penis in hand turning to page 3 shouting "WHAT THE BLOODY HELL IS ALL THIS"

Samm · 20-01-2015, 06:21 PM

The straight men will be pressed af if it get's replaced with men

Kizzy · 20-01-2015, 06:27 PM

want to see tits?...

Spoiler:

and breasts?....

Spoiler:

arista · 22-01-2015, 05:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy

want to see tits?...

Spoiler:

and breasts?....

Spoiler:

Its OK Kizzy

Page 3 is back today

Hard Working Woman have gigs again

Utter Bliss

Crimson Dynamo · 20-01-2015, 06:32 PM

arista · 22-01-2015, 07:08 AM

200k [Angry Political] Women are most upset

GMBHD just reported

MTVN · 22-01-2015, 08:32 AM

amazing trolling from the Sun, made mugs of the feminist brigade

Kizzy · 22-01-2015, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN

amazing trolling from the Sun, made mugs of the feminist brigade

Really... is that what they did?

I don't think so, it was to see what matters to people of the UK. They can suggest in his papers that they privatise the NHS or remove piece by tiny piece everyones civil liberties but what has been seen to gauge the biggest response is the threat to take away page 3.

It's made mugs of all those who buy this 'family' paper by outing them as having no grasp on the importance of immediate sociopolitical threats, or the contemporary issues facing the world as a whole... if all that irks them is an absence of mammaries.

Imagine for a minute if page 3 had never been thought up, that it never existed... Then Mr Murdock announced that from tomorrow in one of the best selling family newspapers a whole page would be given to a semi naked woman, somehow I don't think it would be received as well as it is today.

MTVN · 22-01-2015, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Really... is that what they did?

I don't think so, it was to see what matters to people of the UK. They can suggest in his papers that they privatise the NHS or remove piece by tiny piece everyones civil liberties but what has been seen to gauge the biggest response is the threat to take away page 3.

It's made mugs of all those who buy this 'family' paper by outing them as having no grasp on the importance of immediate sociopolitical threats, or the contemporary issues facing the world as a whole... if all that irks them is an absence of mammaries.

Imagine for a minute if page 3 had never been thought up, that it never existed... Then Mr Murdock announced that from tomorrow in one of the best selling family newspapers a whole page would be given to a semi naked woman, somehow I don't think it would be received as well as it is today.

Possibly they were gauging public opinion yes, but they still played it very cleverly by having their sister paper announce it and then allowing it to be discussed and debated for two days while campaigners smugly congratulated themselves on a battle won. Then having never confirmed or denied that it had gone they gleefully bring it back today as a big middle finger to their opponents. It's classic Sun.

Kizzy · 22-01-2015, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN

Possibly they were gauging public opinion yes, but they still played it very cleverly by having their sister paper announce it and then allowing it to be discussed and debated for two days while campaigners smugly congratulated themselves on a battle won. Then having never confirmed or denied that it had gone they gleefully bring it back today as a big middle finger to their opponents. It's classic Sun.

It's a big middle finger to all those who have bought the sun and whatever sister papers it has that in the absence of any news seemingly across the UK and the world they had the space to report this.
What a victory, can I suggest 'They can take our NHS but they can't take our tits' as the new advertising slogan for news corp?

MTVN · 22-01-2015, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy

It's a big middle finger to all those who have bought the sun and whatever sister papers it has that in the absence of any news seemingly across the UK and the world they had the space to report this.
What a victory, can I suggest 'They can take our NHS but they can't take our tits' as the new advertising slogan for news corp?

I would answer that question kizzy but I'm just off to buy me today's copy of the Sun

MTVN · 22-01-2015, 08:43 AM

kirklancaster · 22-01-2015, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN

LMFAO -- How such an irrelevant twot like Harman ever got to qualify as a QC let alone become an MP is beyond me.

And as for the 'Labour Party' tweeting in triumph, well one must presume that - unlike immigration - this very grave and serious matter of 'titties on page 3' must be something which they will allow all party members to comment on.

arista · 22-01-2015, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTVN

Yes Poxy Harmen
wasting time on this
Feck Labour

Feel The Force

Crimson Dynamo · 22-01-2015, 08:51 AM

Its a victory for common sense and decency

Nedusa · 22-01-2015, 10:51 AM

Regardless of this publicity stunt, I still think the Sun will not continue to show topless woman on page 3 everyday.

Once the decree is made from up high then it is all but over, the Sun probably only printed a topless photo today to make mugs out of all the senior politicians who jumped on the ... "It's about time they stopped bandwagon"

But going forward I still think the Sun will reduce and eventually stop showing topless women in their newspaper.

The main dilemma they have of course is that if the brainless morons who buy this rag cannot keep their few brain cells engaged with ogling nipples they may actually have to attempt to read the black and white stuff ( words - to you and I)

This of course will prove to be thankless task and the resulting mental implosion could bring building sites to a standstill.

So maybe the boobies need to be shown in order to keep the Construction Industry productive.

Tough call....?

.

arista · 22-01-2015, 12:38 PM

"this 'family' paper"

yes relaxed family type

Northern Monkey · 22-01-2015, 12:50 PM

Page 3 is literally the best thing in the Sun,The rest is just bollocks(not literally

).It would be pointless to buy that paper without page 3 as the rest of the content is crap.Imo.

Kizzy · 22-01-2015, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul

Page 3 is literally the best thing in the Sun,The rest is just bollocks(not literally

).It would be pointless to buy that paper without page 3 as the rest of the content is crap.Imo.

Do you actually pay 60p or whatever it is daily simply for one grainy newsprint image of a pair of breasts then?

MTVN · 22-01-2015, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Do you actually pay 60p or whatever it is daily simply for one grainy newsprint image of a pair of breasts then?

40p, absolute bargain

Northern Monkey · 22-01-2015, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Do you actually pay 60p or whatever it is daily simply for one grainy newsprint image of a pair of breasts then?

Nope.I read it at work.Never buy it anymore.It's crap.When i read the 'articles' my first reaction is skepticism which does'nt make an enjoyable read.

Kazanne · 22-01-2015, 01:00 PM

I just think it's kind of pathetic that in this day and age that a pervy newspaper like the Sun is still rolling off the press, What's the matter with you guys ? all I can say is "Get your todgers out"

arista · 22-01-2015, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I just think it's kind of pathetic that in this day and age that a pervy newspaper like the Sun is still rolling off the press, What's the matter with you guys ? all I can say is "Get your todgers out"

no the Builders
do not see it like that
its the Lunch break joy