[Lee.]

I can state that by the time I tried to post something it had been taken down!
Mines was just a rant about how disgusting I found some of the comments

[Jordan.]

I think anyone admitting to anything they posted is just asking for arguments to happen, it's best for people to not know who said what about them.

[Z]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

I think anyone admitting to anything they posted is just asking for arguments to happen, it's best for people to not know who said what about them.

They don't have to admit to what they said, they just have to say "I was responsible for some of the content on that blog." The moderating team can decide what to do after that.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by The baby Zeesus

They don't have to admit to what they said, they just have to say "I was responsible for some of the content on that blog." The moderating team can decide what to do after that.

even then that's still gonna cause drama as people will know who to aim their animosity at over the whole thing.

[Z]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

even then that's still gonna cause drama as people will know who to aim their animosity at over the whole thing.

It'd be done privately and I guess the mods could just give people bans at a later date after they'd come forward so that people don't assume anything. I dunno, just throwing ideas out there.

Essentially I think TiBB doesn't need the return of someone who thinks it's funny to create a hate blog, send pictures of his genitals via private messages to half the forum or stalk people around the internet writing abuse on things they do that have nothing to do with TiBB. He doesn't take this place at all seriously or the people on it - and every high and mighty person likes to say "it's just the internet, don't take it so seriously" but do you know what? That's not true at all. We're all human beings with emotions and feelings and sometimes they can be hurt, especially on the internet where some people don't seem to think the things they say and do have any impact once they've hit the submit reply button. That's why those people end up being excluded from our community and are left begging to return - and I don't think Scott has ever or will ever learn his lesson. He's been given enough second chances. Enough is enough in my opinion.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by The baby Zeesus

It'd be done privately and I guess the mods could just give people bans at a later date after they'd come forward so that people don't assume anything. I dunno, just throwing ideas out there.

Essentially I think TiBB doesn't need the return of someone who thinks it's funny to create a hate blog, send pictures of his genitals via private messages to half the forum or stalk people around the internet writing abuse on things they do that have nothing to do with TiBB. He doesn't take this place at all seriously or the people on it - and every high and mighty person likes to say "it's just the internet, don't take it so seriously" but do you know what? That's not true at all. We're all human beings with emotions and feelings and sometimes they can be hurt, especially on the internet where some people don't seem to think the things they say and do have any impact once they've hit the submit reply button. That's why those people end up being excluded from our community and are left begging to return - and I don't think Scott has ever or will ever learn his lesson. He's been given enough second chances. Enough is enough in my opinion.

Well said Zee.

[Candy Annie Cane]

Originally Posted by The baby Zeesus

They don't have to admit to what they said, they just have to say "I was responsible for some of the content on that blog." The moderating team can decide what to do after that.

Well as you have said, some have admitted to playing a part and nothing happened (that we are aware of)...so nothing should happen to others...therefore meaning scott still takes the blame? I am in no way condoning the blog, I read it and it was awful but there is some injustice in all of this...

[Headie]

I have no idea who this Scott person is... but from my understanding he was banned for writing a vicious blog about people on here?

Sorry, I'm just trying to follow this thread and it's a bit confusing.

[Stu]

Originally Posted by Hayden

I have no idea who this Scott person is... but from my understanding he was banned for writing a vicious blog about people on here?

Sorry, I'm just trying to follow this thread and it's a bit confusing.

Most glorified spam poster in TiBB's history, essentially.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Eggngog

Most glorified spam poster in TiBB's history, essentially.

Yes a Sex Side to it all


I got one sent to me inbox color photo (so did others)
I said mine is Bigger

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes a Sex Side to it all


I got one sent to me inbox color photo (so did others)
I said mine is Bigger

[Me. I Am Salman]

I didn't write anything vile I'm not nasty

[Good King Glennceslas]

There's members involved that I know for a fact that won't own up.

[T*]

I just wanted you let you all know that I never posted anything on that blog and only read it.

[T*]

Wurkit Arista Wurkit

[Black Dagger]

-I only wrote the one comment about Zee trying to be funny and it wasn't and we have had words and I think he's a great guy and I wasn't trying to be malicious- <3. I do think the burn blog never intended to go that far, but heated things were said and it did get brutual, but yeah Scott isn't only to blame in all of this.

[Jessica.]

I was there when it was created and Scott spoke of it in the chat thread but I went offline before he even turned asks on and missed everything.

[In the Drunk Tank]

I think people are simplifying the ban too much by reducing it down to this one blog, pass it off as some silly mistake, and therefore make out it was all a big overreaction by Admin/the Mods. I can't add that much to Zee's post earlier in the thread but Scott himself I'm sure would admit that he's always pushed the boundaries the whole time he was on here, it's why he was originally permabanned as pisshead, it's why he got a 3 month ban as simonsays, and why he had numerous other bans and infractions. The blog alone was not what got him a ban, though I also think that now that it's been a few months since it happened people in hindsight are trying to minimise how bad it was. The stuff on there couldn't really have been any worse and is the sort of stuff that would really make you question people, (and as Zee also said) I don't buy that because it's just the internet, or because it was 'just a joke' that that makes it any less worse

It is an indefinite ban not a permaban and it will be considered (pretty much every ban does get considered in the admin section at some point) and possibly lifted at some point, Admin will decide if and when that is with the help of Mods. Not sure what else there is to add to that.

[Ramsay]

i'm ragin' i missed it

[madame_lalaurie]

first i just want to say i only made this multi because i wanted to have my say and i have no intention of making anymore but this is the only way i can get my point across and once i have posted this i will have nothing more to say

first of all kate i just want to say that i know there is bad blood between us but i really really admire you for the stuff you have said in this thread so thank you

and some of the stuff posted in this thread is completely wrong, i have been on a 3 month ban before (that is the longest i have ever had) but i have never ever been on a 6 month ban

and idk how my first perma from 2007 is relevant because the slate was supposedly wiped clean when i came clean about it and changed my name to scott (and lets get some prospective here it was almost 6 years ago and i was a teenage boy who had only had broadband installed 2 weeks earlier, plus i was permabanned because i got a 24 hour ban and made a multi, so the 3 strike rule that applied in 2007 never really happened for me but whatever)

anyway i dont even know how i feel about the current ban myself, part of me feels as though a permaban would be completely justified because i have crossed the line so many times but anything i have ever done or said on the forum and offsite was never meant to hurt anybody. idk i just have a really ****ed up sense of humor and i guess i just dont consider other peoples feelings enough but whenever i have done or said something i never set out to purposely upset people (and you can all make your own mind up about whether i am telling the truth with that but at the end of the day only 1 person actually knows and that is me)

and yes i do regret everything that has happened not just because it got me banned but because i actually feel bad about it. like just now when i was reading this thread i saw kates post and i actually felt like crying because i just felt like **** for all the bad things i have ever said/done to her and she is still willing to forgive

and i really do agree with everybody that is opposed to me coming back (i agree with their reasons anyway) because everything that has been said (by zee in particular) is completely true apart from him saying that i will never change because this is actually the first time i have felt as though my future on the forum is uncertain and its been a big wake up call (i have never been given a ban longer than 3 months up until now)

and like he says i have never really taken the forum seriously or considered peoples feelings and i feel bad about that and if i do come back i will try my hardest to change

but yeah the point of making this multi was not to appeal for my ban to be lifted i just wanted to have my say (which is totally fair imo) and to apologize to people because i might not have the chance to do that again but dont think this is just some suck up attempt to get me back on the site because right now i just want people to know that i am sorry for everything that was done and said and i just know some people will read this and think oh this is just a false apology to make himself look good

so yeah to summarize i fully agree with the punishment i have been given (the only aspect i disagree with is the uncertainty of it all like if its a perma just tell me coz i think its cruel to just keep me hanging)

AND YOU DON'T NEED TO CLOSE THE THREAD thinking it has encouraged me to make a multi to cause trouble, once this has been posted i am gonna log out and that is that

[Jessica.]

Scott! I agree that it's fair enough for you to have your say, I hope they will give you some kind of final answer about whether it's permanent or not.

[Lee.]

Hi Scott
Fair and genuine sounding post tbh

[Kazanne]

If that is you Scott,kudos for having your say

[Shaun]

Looking back, I think the permaban was an overreaction to a lot of sensitive issues brought up and mocked by other members than Scott.

Keeping him gone (even though he won't ever really be gone because people are going to talk about him on here and keep in touch with him elsewhere) is a little like cutting off the nose to spite your face. There're far more malicious, shallow and revolting little piss-stains roaming free inbetween 3 month and 6 month bans (over the course of 3 years? TAKE THE HINT, JAMES) but because they don't have the initiative to set up a site they get away with it? That's frankly stupid.

[Jake.]

Fair play Scott