FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Still nobody has explained why it's a woke advert... ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
Quote:
I'm surprised you don't every hear anyone using the word 'woke'. It's out there, everywhere. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
It may be a sh** advert but it's got people torking.
Served its purpose. ::; Job done. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
people are expressing dissatisfaction with the advert. It really doesn't matter how they choose to express that dissatisfaction. The brand Jaguar has an associated image and the advert doesn't reflect the image many people expect. That's the reality
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
As SB rephrased from my post, it has the "woke aesthetic" where everyone is deliberately unattractive, but the content or storyline isn't woke. If it were redone in the exact same way with the same racial makeup, but with super models in revealing clothing, no-one would call it woke.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Plus, if all models that were cast in this advert had been white but ugly as sin, there's no way it would have been called "woke", I just don't think that's realistic. We all know what "woke" means to these people in 2024, it means diverse. Appreciate you actually having a conversation in good faith though and not just avoiding the question like the plague. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
And to answer your question, my definition of **** (which I don't know why the word is being censored lol) falls into three categories for me. 1. Deliberately casting ugly people for roles under the guise of being "more realistic" because yes, Karen Gillan, Gal Gadot, and Margot Robbie aren't real, guys. I believe that they're just AI images imprinted into our minds. ![]() 2. Dialogue being incredibly drab, safe, and boring because they're constantly scared of "offending" people. And 3. When we stop having what I call the BBUK level of diversity, which I think was quite well balanced this series imo. We instead have to have every identity all in one Show just for the sake of having them in the Show, and that includes the white straight male role too, I just want to see people that fit whatever Show that they're in. That's the three criterias where I judge something as ****.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() Last edited by Mystic Mock; 22-11-2024 at 10:40 PM. |
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|