[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by jet

By association their stanch defenders have been made laughing stocks of as well.

Job done.

And their haters too

[Crimson Dynamo]

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's popularity in US slumps even further: Duke's approval
rating drops by three points in a month to -10 while his wife hits -17 in new poll after they
were savaged in South Park episode

• Harry and Meghan have net approval ratings of -10 and -17 respectively, says poll
• Since December last year, Harry has sunk 48 points and Meghan 40 in the US

oh my



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...k-episode.html

Top comment: Have they started their World Privacy Tour yet?

[Glenn.]

But threw it all away to make a quick buck off her name. You can wrap it up however you want. Her father and half sister relinquished any relationship with Meghan after selling themselves

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

But threw it all away to make a quick buck off her name. You can wrap it up however you want. Her father and half sister relinquished any relationship with Meghan after selling themselves

….one silly story and she dismissed all he did for her over the years to get her where she is today….ungrateful and unforgivable.

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

But threw it all away to make a quick buck off her name. You can wrap it up however you want. Her father and half sister relinquished any relationship with Meghan after selling themselves

He didn't need to make a quick buck off her name , so you can wrap it up however you want, it all gonna come out now and you'll look as big a fool as everyone else who believed her lies.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

But threw it all away to make a quick buck off her name. You can wrap it up however you want. Her father and half sister relinquished any relationship with Meghan after selling themselves

Harry and Meghan are making many millions badmouthing their families, yet you don’t say a word about that. Those blinkers you wear are of the industrial heavy duty kind. Never has the expression ‘you couldn’t make it up’ been more apt.

[jet]

After she met Harry, she pretended she grew up poor and that she had to work to put herself through college. Rags to riches story. All lies. She was handed everything on a plate and her Dad paid every penny of her education at the best, expensive schools and bought her a car and an apartment.
Her compulsive lying about things which are easily disproved is very strange.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

After she met Harry, she pretended she grew up poor and that she had to work to put herself through college. Rags to riches story. All lies. She was handed everything on a plate and her Dad paid every penny of her education at the best, expensive schools and bought her a car and an apartment.
Her compulsive lying about things which are easily disproved is very strange.

According to court documents, Meghan Markle has refuted her father's claim that she never offered him financial support.

Thomas Markle claimed that Meghan never offered him financial support, even though he took out loans to help pay for her tuition at Northwestern University

This is very untrue, according to Meghan, who asserted in legal documents that she began making "voluntary contributions" to her father when she began working in January 2014. Meghan wrote in the legal docs:

"In any event, it is admitted and has never been denied that the Claimant’s father supported her throughout her childhood and as a young adult.

Mr Markle did not pay for all of the Claimant’s college tuition. The Claimant’s mother also contributed towards her university costs.

In addition, the Claimant received scholarships for academic achievement, which reduced the payable tuition fees.

The Claimant also undertook a work-study programme whereby income she made from working on campus after class was applied directly to supplement and lower her tuition costs, thus personally contributing to her tuition as well."

According to the documents, Thomas Markle took out a loan to help pay for Meghan's education at Northwestern University. Although she says she's unaware if the loan has been repaid, Meghan began voluntarily providing Thomas with financial support after her acting career took off.

Meghan continued making these voluntary contributions until her royal wedding in May 2018, according to court docs.

------

Looks like court documents from a legal case she WON doesn't line up with what you're claiming here but regardless imagine a child so selfishly accepting financial support from their parent????

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

According to court documents, Meghan Markle has refuted her father's claim that she never offered him financial support.

Thomas Markle claimed that Meghan never offered him financial support, even though he took out loans to help pay for her tuition at Northwestern University

This is very untrue, according to Meghan, who asserted in legal documents that she began making "voluntary contributions" to her father when she began working in January 2014. Meghan wrote in the legal docs:

"In any event, it is admitted and has never been denied that the Claimant’s father supported her throughout her childhood and as a young adult.

Mr Markle did not pay for all of the Claimant’s college tuition. The Claimant’s mother also contributed towards her university costs.

In addition, the Claimant received scholarships for academic achievement, which reduced the payable tuition fees.

The Claimant also undertook a work-study programme whereby income she made from working on campus after class was applied directly to supplement and lower her tuition costs, thus personally contributing to her tuition as well."

According to the documents, Thomas Markle took out a loan to help pay for Meghan's education at Northwestern University. Although she says she's unaware if the loan has been repaid, Meghan began voluntarily providing Thomas with financial support after her acting career took off.

Meghan continued making these voluntary contributions until her royal wedding in May 2018, according to court docs.

------

Looks like court documents from a legal case she WON doesn't line up with what you're claiming here but regardless imagine a child so selfishly accepting financial support from their parent????

Could you give a link for this article please?

She won because:
‘[The judge had correctly decided that, whilst it might have been proportionate to publish a very small part of the letter for that purpose, it was not necessary to publish half the contents of the letter."]

‘That purpose’ meaning the paper should only have published the part that was in dispute. Otherwise, she wouldn’t have won. It was nothing whatsoever to do with the truth about who paid for what, it was a privacy matter.
Are you forgetting that she lied to the court and said she ‘forgot’ about emails she had sent Jason Kauf? There goes that word’ lie’ again.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Youtube video

[arista]

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by arista

Fair enough....

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by arista

Keeping the royalists happy....

[arista]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-Cottage.html

[bots]

quite right too, they have left the royal family and also don't live in the uk, why should it stand empty waiting on when they feel like using it

[Liam-]

Evicting someone from somewhere they do y live? How performative of him, nice of him to being his pervert brother back into the public fold though, what a good old chap he is

[Liam-]

Convenient that this is announced when he’s getting a bollocking in the media for not being politically neutral though, a sheer coincidence I’m sure

[bots]

i think it's funny that charles sent out the eviction notice immediately after spare was published. Nothing vindictive there

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i think it's funny that charles sent out the eviction notice immediately after spare was published. Nothing vindictive there

Mmm he’d have to lick the back of his own head on the stamp ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[user104658]

I get moving them out, there's no point in it sitting there empty as they're obviously not coming back, but ... why give it to Andrew? .

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

I get moving them out, there's no point in it sitting there empty as they're obviously not coming back, but ... why give it to Andrew? .

Andrew has been protected from day 1,The Queen herself was still looking after him despite everything . And we all know he'll still be living off royal inheritance. So yeah baffling really.

[jet]

The King isn’t ‘giving’ it to Andrew as a gift or a kindness. Far from it.
He is trying to force him into it because he is cutting back his allowance and Andrew will no longer be able to afford the upkeep of his massive present home, which I assume will then go on sale. Reports are that Andrew is fighting back on having to relocate to Frogmore Cottage.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

I get moving them out, there's no point in it sitting there empty as they're obviously not coming back, but ... why give it to Andrew? .

It’s not rocket science

He is the king’s brother
He is in a bigger property a stone’s throw away from frogmore
The bigger property will probably be given to William and Kate

It’s only the papers trying to make big deal out of the situation

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

He is in a bigger property a stone’s throw away from frogmore

I'm sure that was tested

[Glenn.]

They don’t even live there. Seeing the haters joyously saying they’re been evicted lmao bless ‘em.