FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_1...-10391704.html
![]() This is now Taxed http://www.channel4.com/news/denmark...at-tax-on-food Will the UK Follow (excluding Scotland) Sign Of The Times Last edited by arista; 04-10-2011 at 10:08 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
they won't want to add tax on there products. Last edited by arista; 04-10-2011 at 11:05 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Hands off my Brick!
|
I see what they're trying to do but talk about nanny state. There's no such thing as free will anymore
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
Glue Bottle Explosion
|
Quote:
Yeah man, wikileaks is totally going to leak some wire on how the government of Denmark is in on some conspiracy to discourage people from eating junk food. 2k12 y2k UFO's 9/11 bigfoot I'M GOING INSANE MAN. Or maybe it's that obesity and poor diets lead to a considerable decrease in the physical health of a nations population, which leads to an increase in the cost of taking care of ones citizens, especially in a nation with universal healthcare. The amount of money that is put into advertising that encourages people to eat unhealthy foods is astronomical, generally dwarfing the amount of money that is available for campaigns to educate people about eating healthy. It makes sense to increase a tax on something that makes people unhealthy. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
That doesn't even make sense. This is the very definition of a Nanny State. They are making personal decisions for people for them.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
Amapoa Belíssima
|
I'm not sure if I'm in favour of adding tax on booze, fags or unhealthy food because I just think if people want to be unhealthy, it's their choice. But I guess their choices often cost a lot to the government, NHS etc and the whole society ends up paying for the treatment for some individuals.
I understand it but I'm never the one in favour of the government interfering with people's life choices. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
Amapoa Belíssima
|
Yes, I agree with you. But I'm not sure if I think any of those things should have an extra tax in the first place.
Last edited by Chuck; 04-10-2011 at 12:07 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
if they tax cigs and alcohol, they should tax fatty foods too
but better solution would be to just not produce cigs, alcohol or fatty foods in the first place |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
|
|||
Pyramid*
|
As far as fags and booze is concerned, eEconomically, the UK would be in an even worse state than it already is: and the people earning the lower wages would be the ones who'd end up having to pay more tax on their earnings / council tax / road taxes and god knows what else to make up the defecit though.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I don't know where the balance is but fags & Booze cost the NHS a heap of money as well as making it in taxes. But rather than taxing harmful products, i'd love to see a Harmful Products Tax laid on the Manufacturer rather than the consumer. Maybe it could be tied into an estimate of how much money the NHS spends on dealing with them. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
Frozen
|
Some ''low fat'' foods are often high in sugar. What we need is more people taking responsibility with their lives or banning the stock. Campaigns do NOT work. Smoking and Drink are big buisness for buisness so govt. make loads of tax from them.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
In Denmark they will. The First Nation to do the Fat Food Tax |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
|
||||
Frozen
|
No they are not quite, it is the GOVERNMENT who are taking responsibility not every day people. The reason why so many children are obese can be blamed to poor parenting.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I know the UK Government has for years ran campaigns and adverts, but that just misses the point that people who over eat are week willed and will not listen to reason, i am a Smoker and i know how week willed i am in trying to give it up.
No Campaigns will work. So what should they do run campaigns forever and hope know one notices there going backwards or be Brave like ![]() Also the Parents that CAN stop there kids and themselves from eating too much, DO and those that can not, DONT. Enter stage right The Government. Lets have a few less Puddings on the bargain shelves at Tesco's and a bit more proper grub, the kind that tastes good without a chemical soak. Cost more? Yes, Who's going to pay for it? This guy below. the Boss of Tesco's Mr Terry Leahy ![]() he looks like the kind of smug drip that might have the odd 3.4 billion a year to soften a blow or two. I rang him up and he says it's ok! Last edited by Cromwell1900; 04-10-2011 at 05:35 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
"This guy below. the Boss of Tesco's Mr Terry Leahy"
No he is not anymore. Last edited by arista; 04-10-2011 at 08:49 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
it's a very discriminatory tax
if you are going to tax people for being fat becauase they put mnore of a burden on the NHS, then you should also put a tax on Anorexia. Anorexia and Obesity are the same disease. Why don't we punish people who are too skinny like we punish people who are too fat??? and you should have a tax on people with Cancer, people with cancer cost more to the NHS. and you should have a tax for being old, old people also have more health problems. Basicaly you should put a tax on everyone who has any kind of disease at all. Anemia tax, Alergies tax, AIDS tax etc....
__________________
Don't be afraid to be weak. Last edited by lostalex; 06-10-2011 at 11:44 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
why should fast food be targetted? because it's cheap and it makes a profit?
All delicious food is unhealthy. And NO delicious fod is healthy. Because it's not about the food, it's about the AMOUNT OF FOOD. French food has way more fat and calories than british food, but British people are fatter, why? because of portions, not because of the food itself. Targetting the fast food restauirants is BS because food at very expensive restaurants is just as unhealthy, the only difference is that it's more expensive. Why should only rich people be able to eat unhealthy food? it's going back in time, when british kings and queens were all fat, because fat was a sign of wealth. Look at Victorian times, all people of wealth were fat. SHOULD WE GO BACK TO TIMES WEHRE POOR PEOPLE ARE SKINNY AND ONLY rich people are fat? WHy? i thought we strive for equality. why should we try to make poor people skinny again. Obesity is a disease, just like Anorexia. We should be providing these people with more healthcare, not more taxes.
__________________
Don't be afraid to be weak. Last edited by lostalex; 06-10-2011 at 12:31 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | ||
|
|||
Pyramid*
|
Quote:
We've all had this arguement a zillion times with you lostalex. We know, you think fat people and obese people are ill. The vast majority are not. The vast majority of fat people/obsese people are like that due to consuming more calories than the use up. Whether you like that or not, is of no concern to me - but that is FACT. |
||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|