FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-02-2021, 11:58 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
They are Crazy
Its Breast Milk not Human Milk You Woke Freaks [Hospital tells doctors, nurses and midwives to say 'birthing parents' and 'human milk' instead of 'mothers' and 'breastmilk' because they risk offending transgender people Brighton and Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust unveiled 'gender inclusive' phrases The Trust is the first in the country to formally implement such a radical overhaul Document released this week, said staff should not stop using the word 'woman] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...uman-milk.html Debated on Politics Live BBC2HD |
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:03 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Niamh.
|
Always replacing the word woman, why is that? I've yet to see the word man be replaced by Prostate owner or father being replaced by Sperm giver
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:06 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Scumbug, Maggot
|
Women really are the only group of people who can't stand up for their rights without being called names like "TERF" ... Which is ironic really, as they seem to be losing the right to even be called women!
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:08 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Niamh.
|
Seriously. All this kind of thing is just so regressive to women's rights and trying to get out of those bloody gender role boxes
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:21 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
self-oscillating
|
are there any humans other than woman that can produce milk? If not, why the need to reclassify
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:40 PM | #6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
"Brighton and Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust reduce women down to bodily functions" is the correct title.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:42 PM | #7 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Also, why would "breastmilk" be offensive to a transgender person?
Probably isn't. |
||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:43 PM | #8 | |||
|
||||
Niamh.
|
Quote:
Birthing parents, menstruators, cervix havers ..........so ****ing dehumanising
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:46 PM | #9 | |||
|
||||
baddie
|
Trans men and non binary people can menstruate, have cervix’s and give birth. What exactly is your solution for general terms that they can use to include all these groups?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:48 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
Cherie
|
Quote:
and a non binary person might still have breasts, they would be attached to their body, why would they not want to mention breasts...?
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
Last edited by Cherie Christmas; 10-02-2021 at 12:49 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:49 PM | #11 | |||
|
||||
Scumbug, Maggot
|
Females?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:55 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
baddie
|
Well I’m not a trans man so you’d have to ask someone who is, also google has never failed me. All I know is that there is trans men giving birth and that’s enough for me to justify more gender butyrate language in the hospitals. I don’t see the need for knowing exactly why they want a child.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:55 PM | #13 | |||
|
||||
Niamh.
|
Quote:
Why is it only women who are being forced to change our language?
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 12:58 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Cherie
|
Quote:
any comment on the breasts that the non binary person has attached to their body..
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:07 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
baddie
|
Quote:
From what I’ve seen it’s not just women I’ve heard things like “people with penises/prostates” used. I’m not going to click on the dailymail article but from arista’s extract it looks like they’re talking specifically about the birthing process and people who are born male don’t do that. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:09 PM | #16 | |||
|
||||
Scumbug, Maggot
|
Half the population are women, and only a micropercentage of those women identify as men or nonbinary. Why should half the population lose their name for <1% ?
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:13 PM | #17 | |||
|
||||
baddie
|
Quote:
The breast thing has me as confused as everyone else coz I’ve honestly never heard of breasts being offensive. On the same hand I don’t understand how Human milk is anymore dehumanising than breast milk |
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:17 PM | #18 | |||
|
||||
Snow Surrender
|
silly woke pandering nonsense
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:21 PM | #19 | |||
|
||||
AnnieK
|
Every human has breasts....be they male or female so to now have to say chest feeding sounds daft.
I don't mind gender neutral medical terms to be honest, it often is the case that Doctors use medical terms rather than the more colloquial ones non medical people will use. What will become discriminatory in my view is forcing born women to change the way they speak about their own body to use gender neutral terms. I can't see how that could ever happen but if I were to have another child and want to feed my child using breast milk from my breasts I don't want to have to call it human milk
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:25 PM | #20 | |||
|
||||
GoldHeart
|
What exactly made them do this??? , why is there an issue with saying female and woman.
Why would trans people be offended , I'm extremely confused and frustrated with this type of silliness . And when someone transitions from male to female surely they wouldn't have a problem with female phrases?? this literally makes no senses . |
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:30 PM | #21 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
'Inclusive language' stuff, I tend to not see an issue IF its used..for transmen/non binary people. Like, theres no issue at all for medics ad such to be trained to talk in a different way if treating someone who does not identify as female.
Using it wholesale though, just kind of seems crappy. Its honestly like woman, mother, etc are dirty words. And yes, its never anything to do with men, seemingly. Only ever women. Infact, oddly, I have found those who tend to shout about how the correct term is menstruators or whatever, REALLY do not like you also using terms such as penis people if referring to men. I don't do it often like, I did it a couple of times in a convo about this stuff, and got a lot of abuse for it, apparently, men is fine. So, tell me this is not rampant misogyny really..honestly.. |
||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:34 PM | #22 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
An article from the Daily Mail that's full of language and terminology meant to incite gammon about gender? Surely not!?
|
||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:36 PM | #23 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:37 PM | #24 | |||
|
||||
Scumbug, Maggot
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
10-02-2021, 01:38 PM | #25 | |||
|
||||
GoldHeart
|
Quote:
I hope this daft trend stays in Brighton, if a woman go into labour they can't expect her to be called just a "person" with "human milk" sounds ridiculous . Last edited by Christmas Spirit; 10-02-2021 at 01:39 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|