Harry and Meghan - Official Discussion Thread

[GoldHeart]

It was reported after the interview on all the news bulletins that both had stated that neither the Queen or Prince Philip had made the inappropriate comment.

So she never rubbished him at all.

Sadly it falls on deaf ears ,hence us all going around the mulberry bush over and over again .

[joeysteele]

I swear certain members troll in these threads

They only really made allegations as to the institution.
Which quite frankly does seem to fail many in the Royal set up in my view.

We,none of us, were there at the time of them and others dealing with, or trying to, with the institution.

I mean really, the Queen said in her statement, she was saddened to hear of the problems the couple had found in the Royal set up.

Like the Queen knew little to nothing of it, in my view likely because the institution as it is, will keep things away from the Monarch.

It makes no difference to the fact, their concerns were with the institutional set up, not anything with the Queen or Prince Philip themselves.

I don't know about trolling, however that's the facts..
Expressing dismay and criticising the Royal set up institution , is not in any way criticising or rubbishing the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh.

They in fact mostly expressed praise and admiration for the Queen.
So it's really unjust to indicate they did rubbish either of them.

[joeysteele]

Sadly it falls on deaf ears ,hence us all going around the mulberry bush over and over again .

Yes, it hasn't improved one bit GoldHeart.
It's why I in the main keep off these threads now.
However, I do usually hate unjust character assassination.

[rusticgal]

Meghan and Harry did as an after thought make a statement to say their comments were not directed at The Queen and Prince Philip...however I think the point that has been made is that some of their claims have been made against The Institution that The Queen and Prince Philip have spent their lives dedicated to and making it is what it is today.

[Marsh.]

They dedicated 70 years to it so it's perfect and not to be criticised, whilst Meghan should just suck it up and accept the lies being perpetuated in the media with no one speaking up on her behalf. Erm... no.

[thesheriff443]

They dedicated 70 years to it so it's perfect and not to be criticised, whilst Meghan should just suck it up and accept the lies being perpetuated in the media with no one speaking up on her behalf. Erm... no.

This is not a trick question marsh
Would you have done that interview?

[jet]

Meghan and Harry did as an after thought make a statement to say their comments were not directed at The Queen and Prince Philip...however I think the point that has been made is that some of their claims have been made against The Institution that The Queen and Prince Philip have spent their lives dedicated to and making it is what it is today.

Yes, they were sly enough not to criticize the Queen or Philip because they knew that wouldn’t go down well at all, imo, especially with the Duke so ill, so they did so indirectly.
Not long before the interview was to go out they had their remaining patronages and Harry’s army titles removed, a decision the Queen had to make.
It was reported they were furious.
Remember their dig back at the Queen “service is universal”?
Not long after that Oprah was seen arriving with her camera crew to make adjustments to the interview. Hmmm...Oh to be a fly on the wall! :hee:

[Tom4784]

At this point, people who try to lie about an interview that's been watched millions of times around the world and act like Meghan Markle insulted the royal family and attacked them are up there with anti-vaxxers and flat earthers because all three rely on lying to themselves and others to try to validate their own falsities.

[user104658]

At this point, people who try to lie about an interview that's been watched millions of times around the world and act like Meghan Markle insulted the royal family and attacked them are up there with anti-vaxxers and flat earthers because all three rely on lying to themselves and others to try to validate their own falsities.

I doubt most of them actually watched it at all; they're just reading what other people have said about it, and going with that as being accurate. Like writing a English Lit essay on a novel you didn't read by skimming over the Wikipedia page.

[thesheriff443]

I doubt most of them actually watched it at all; they're just reading what other people have said about it, and going with that as being accurate. Like writing a English Lit essay on a novel you didn't read by skimming over the Wikipedia page.

I asked marsh but he didn’t reply, would you have done that interview ts.

[user104658]

I asked marsh but he didn’t reply, would you have done that interview ts.

If myself or my wife was being rubbished all over the press and had a bunch of bureaucrats were insisting I couldn't refute the articles? I'd have done the interview, named names, and aired every last piece of The Firm's dirty laundry ten times over. And that's if I was Harry; Meghan owes them even less.

[thesheriff443]

If myself or my wife was being rubbished all over the press and had a bunch of bureaucrats were insisting I couldn't refute the articles? I'd have done the interview, named names, and aired every last piece of The Firm's dirty laundry ten times over. And that's if I was Harry; Meghan owes them even less.

But it’s only actually hurt his family and in time himself if not already

Bureaucrats couldn’t give a toss

And the interview did themselves more harm than good because it was filled with untruths and half truths that made the people that didn’t believe them before the interview justified in not believing them

[user104658]

But it’s only actually hurt his family and in time himself if not already

Bureaucrats couldn’t give a toss

And the interview did themselves more harm than good because it was filled with untruths and half truths that made the people that didn’t believe them before the interview justified in not believing them

I suppose then to clarify; I wouldn't have done Oprah because yes those US-style interviews are what they are. They're tailored for US television so, like US reality television, they like to "curate" the interview a bit. That's mostly just a cultural difference. When I say I'd have done it I just mean I wouldn't have stayed quiet, and "hurting your family's feelings" shouldn't be a reason to say nothing. What's the point? It only leads to resentment - in fact I'd say years of Harry keeping his mouth shut on thing he'd have liked to talk about more (Diana) has already lead to some resentment. The more important aspect of his family is his wife and child now. That's just what happens when you have kids; I strongly believe your loyalties should always lie with your OWN family that you've started, your spouse and children, not with your parents/grandparents/siblings.

So yes I'd have done an interview, but no it probably wouldn't have been that style of interview.

[thesheriff443]

I suppose then to clarify; I wouldn't have done Oprah because yes those US-style interviews are what they are. They're tailored for US television so, like US reality television, they like to "curate" the interview a bit. That's mostly just a cultural difference. When I say I'd have done it I just mean I wouldn't have stayed quiet, and "hurting your family's feelings" shouldn't be a reason to say nothing. What's the point? It only leads to resentment - in fact I'd say years of Harry keeping his mouth shut on thing he'd have liked to talk about more (Diana) has already lead to some resentment. The more important aspect of his family is his wife and child now. That's just what happens when you have kids; I strongly believe your loyalties should always lie with your OWN family that you've started, your spouse and children, not with your parents/grandparents/siblings.

So yes I'd have done an interview, but no it probably wouldn't have been that style of interview.

But you could of called your family out to their face and not got the whole world involved.

There now needs to be a line drawn under this no one is standing in Harry and meghans way.

[jet]

But it’s only actually hurt his family and in time himself if not already

Bureaucrats couldn’t give a toss

And the interview did themselves more harm than good because it was filled with untruths and half truths that made the people that didn’t believe them before the interview justified in not believing them

Yes, I agree, and I wouldn't be surprised if Harry is regretting it. The lies were just so unnessesary so it was spite really just to insult their own family and make them look bad, but all it did was make them look bad. Polls afterwards showed how their popularity plummeted even more in the aftermath. It showed that not many like disloyal squealers who feel they need to tell the whole world how victimised they thought they were. I mean, who does that? Pathetic.

[user104658]

But you could of called your family out to their face and not got the whole world involved.

There now needs to be a line drawn under this no one is standing in Harry and meghans way.


I highly doubt the interview was the first the family had heard about these issues.

[GoldHeart]

Yes, I agree, and I wouldn't be surprised if Harry is regretting it. The lies were just so unnessesary so it was spite really just to insult their own family and make them look bad, but all it did was make them look bad. Poll afterwards showed how their popularity plummeted even more in the aftermath. It showed that not many like disloyal squealers who feel they need to tell the whole world how victimised they thought they were. I mean, who does that? Pathetic.

Oh because Harry & Meghan were loved so much in the media before the interview? , Was Meghan meant to sit and shut up at all the racist abuse and verbal insults and nit picking she got written and said about her.

The Royal institution clearly has alot of problems which needed to have light shed on it , and Harry & Meghan have shown how it wasn't all rosy behind doors. So stepping back was the best option.

The monarchy needs to be brought into the 21st century , not everyone is going to grin and bear it if things are going badly.

[jet]

The Royal institution clearly has alot of problems which needed to have light shed on it

If they were going to complain in front of the world, they needed to focus on real, valid complaints and not a lot of spiteful guff against the family which have subsequently been proven to be lies, half truths and exaggerations.

[bots]

everyone knows the monarchy needs bringing up to date, it's been obvious for decades, but nothing will happen until the queen dies

[jet]

But you could of called your family out to their face and not got the whole world involved.

There now needs to be a line drawn under this no one is standing in Harry and meghans way.

I agree. They have the glitzy lifestyle they wanted (or Meghan wanted more imo), the money deals they wanted, no pesky royal duties, the celeb 'friends', the lovely home, a little boy and a girl on the way. There was no point whatsoever in doing an interview spilling their bile and stirring up more trouble, it was pure spite. I really don't think they are happy people.

[Crimson Dynamo]

It was reported after the interview on all the news bulletins that both had stated that neither the Queen or Prince Philip had made the inappropriate comment.

So she never rubbished him at all.

that happened the next day when the sht hit the fan and the comments backfired - sadly by then the damage had been done. There was no need whatsoever for a private conversation to be taken out of context deliberately for salacious gossip reasons and to get headlines

it was cruel, cold and heartless

[user104658]

that happened the next day when the sht hit the fan and the comments backfired - sadly by then the damage had been done. There was no need whatsoever for a private conversation to be taken out of context deliberately for salacious gossip reasons and to get headlines

it was cruel, cold and heartless

https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xy2JYVtFWJD1kc/giphy.gif

[Marsh.]

This is not a trick question marsh
Would you have done that interview?

Not sure of the relevance, but it's not a question I can answer as I haven't lived Harry or Meghan's life so have no basis to form that decision on.

[Marsh.]

I asked marsh but he didn’t reply, would you have done that interview ts.

Apologies for not answering instantly. My crystal ball that informs me of when someone has quoted me on tibb is on the blink.

[GoldHeart]

Not sure of the relevance, but it's not a question I can answer as I haven't lived Harry or Meghan's life so have no basis to form that decision on.

I don't think any of us can know for certain unless we were in their shoes, being a public figure who's not only famous but part of the royals ,which plays a big part of it aswell.

[Amy Jade]

Was Meghan meant to sit and shut up at all the racist abuse and verbal insults

Sadly I think that is what some expect. That is why the outrage is so much more directed towards Meghan than Harry. Sexism.

[Tom4784]

Bigotry has always been a huge factor behind the hatred for Meghan, I think it's why most of the time, people seem to invent reasons to hate her, because they can't admit the real reasons are bigoted in nature. It's better to pretend she insulted the Queen or Prince Phillip then admit that the reason for the hate is because of her race, gender and/or her nationality.

[rusticgal]

...



the reason for the hate is because of her race, gender and/or her nationality.


Thats how you like to see it....and maybe there are some that do but not on here. Meghan has done a number of things to give people a reason to dislike her and its nothing to do with her Race, Gender or Nationality.

[hijaxers]

Thats how you like to see it....and maybe there are some that do but not on here. Meghan has done a number of things to give people a reason to dislike her and its nothing to do with her Race, Gender or Nationality.

:clap1::clap1::clap1:

[Tom4784]

Thats how you like to see it....and maybe there are some that do but not on here. Meghan has done a number of things to give people a reason to dislike her and its nothing to do with her Race, Gender or Nationality.

It's more interesting that you felt the need to clarify your own position, if the situation was reversed, I wouldn't feel the need to clarify because I knew a post like that wouldn't apply to me.

[Marsh.]

It's more interesting that you felt the need to clarify your own position, if the situation was reversed, I wouldn't feel the need to clarify because I knew a post like that wouldn't apply to me.

:clap1: :clap1: :clap1:

[Cherie]

https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/meghan-markle-prince-harry-have-23908802

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have "regrets" over the unfortunate timing of their interview with Oprah Winfrey, but insist they had no control over when it was aired.

Their explosive interview aired while Prince Philip was in hospital and Harry's grandfather has since passed away.

But while Meghan and Harry regret the timing of the interview, it is something they felt they had to do, a source close to the pair told Heat Magazine.

Harry had not seen the Duke of Edinburgh in over a year following his decision to quit the Royal Family and his life in the UK.

But he did have a close bond with the 99-year-old and spoke highly of him in the tell-all discussion with the US presenter.

And now a source close to Meghan and Harry has told how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex "wish things could have been different".

Oh dear, I thought it was all about control :fan:

[thesheriff443]

The interview went down like a lead balloon and now they are back tracking

[thesheriff443]

Harry and William will not stand together at the funeral Peter Philips prince Anne’s son will stand between them on the wishes of the queen
And no one will wear military uniforms instead they will wear there medals on morning coats
Some say it’s to spare Harry as he would be the only one not in uniform

[user104658]

Harry and William will not stand together at the funeral Peter Philips prince Anne’s son will stand between them on the wishes of the queen
And no one will wear military uniforms instead they will wear there medals on morning coats
Some say it’s to spare Harry as he would be the only one not in uniform

Bit odd? If it was out of choice that would be one thing, maybe it is and saying it was Liz's decision is an excuse, but strange to say they've not to stand together if they would have chosen to? It also means we'll never know - but will lead to speculation about the "OMG big rift" because they're not standing together - because most people won't be aware that they didn't get the choice :think:.

[thesheriff443]

Bit odd? If it was out of choice that would be one thing, maybe it is and saying it was Liz's decision is an excuse, but strange to say they've not to stand together if they would have chosen to? It also means we'll never know - but will lead to speculation about the "OMG big rift" because they're not standing together - because most people won't be aware that they didn't get the choice :think:.

Do we ever really get the full story, I’d say definitely no we don’t

William will be king one day maybe he has said something and to be honest you can see him and his dad being p1ssed off at harry

[user104658]

Do we ever really get the full story, I’d say definitely no we don’t

William will be king one day maybe he has said something and to be honest you can see him and his dad being p1ssed off at harry

If we're going to have kings and queens at all, I don't think we want a petty king who holds grudges? But that's what I mean really; it would be interesting to know if it really was The Queen's decision, or if it was someone else's decision but they think it sounds better if it's put down to "Boss's choice".

[Crimson Dynamo]

At least here in Scotland we dont have petty squabbles and grudges and people going off and leaving and doing their own thing :hmph:

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/139/590x/secondary/Alex-Salmond-launched-his-own-political-party-3000559.jpg?r=1618325509787

[user104658]

At least here in Scotland we dont have petty squabbles and grudges and people going off and leaving and doing their own thing :hmph:

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/139/590x/secondary/Alex-Salmond-launched-his-own-political-party-3000559.jpg?r=1618325509787

Have you seen the Alba party political ad where they're "endorsed by Robert the Bruce"? :joker: Someone is trolling.

[thesheriff443]

If we're going to have kings and queens at all, I don't think we want a petty king who holds grudges? But that's what I mean really; it would be interesting to know if it really was The Queen's decision, or if it was someone else's decision but they think it sounds better if it's put down to "Boss's choice".

To others it may seem petty but in reality his own brother and his wife accused his family of being racist and William was asked if his family was racist on an official engagement
Harry went on to rubbish his father Charles.

And they have disrespected the queen with the blatant digs about a life of service.

[bots]

Andrew isn't entitled to wear military uniform either as he stepped down from public duties. I would think the no uniform was more for his benefit

Also, the whole military thing doesn't match with the family funeral concept

[Marsh.]

Well I'd be more concerned about the racist stopping being racist than trying to shut the black woman up who experienced it.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Well I'd be more concerned about the racist stopping being racist than trying to shut the black woman up who experienced it.

an innocent remark isnt racism

in many ways it just devalues actual racial hatred

[user104658]

To others it may seem petty but in reality his own brother and his wife accused his family of being racist and William was asked if his family was racist on an official engagement
Harry went on to rubbish his father Charles.

And they have disrespected the queen with the blatant digs about a life of service.


Maybe but I think it must be amplified by their positions or people see it that way, because it's not beyond (and actually in many ways far less than) what you'll see in pretty much any family. Families say the actual WORST **** about each other and still get together for Sunday dinner... I don't think it's unacceptable to have criticisms of your family... and I don't think Harry's criticisms of his family are particularly huge. I'm sure they have criticisms of him - that's fine too.

As for the digs about service, I don't really know that it was a dig. They pointed out that no one needs an official role or title to live a life of service, which is true, and surely only a positive message. It doesn't mean that The Queen hasn't lived one or shouldn't have, it doesn't downplay the actions or achievements of any of them, it's just pointing out that you can still do that without it being an official position :shrug:.

[user104658]

an innocent remark isnt racism

in many ways it just devalues actual racial hatred


No; a racist remark doesn't necessarily indicate a racist PERSON but that doesn't mean you ignore the remark. In fact, anyone who is not a racist person should surely be glad to hear that something they've said could come across as racist, so that they consider their words more carefully in future?

As the parent of a disabled child this is something I encounter all the time; even well-meaning people can say some really offensive crap about learning disability without any idea that it's ill conceived. Some of the worst of it has come from family members awkwardly struggling to ask things. I'd rather correct them then just think "Aww well they meant well and didn't mean anything bad by it so I'll just let it slide". If they weren't trying to offend, then they don't WANT to offend, so you should tell them it didn't come across well?

[bots]

Harry and Meghan can consider themselves fortunate that the queen doesn't have the power that Henry 8th had, he would have sorted the "disagreement" out swiftly :flutter:

[joeysteele]

Nothing to read in William and Harry being not walking together side by side.
They are walking side by side with Prince Philip, one more to the right of Prince Philip, the other more to the Left of him.

I have 3 Brothers, when my Father died, we wanted to help carry his coffin.
We chose the oldest and me the youngest to do so, one of us on the right side, the other on the left.
My other 2 Brothers walked behind into the Church.

So I read it as Prince Philips Grandsons are there one at his right, one at his left, another in the centre.
Actually in my view highly respectful and appropriate too.

[user104658]

Harry and Meghan can consider themselves fortunate that the queen doesn't have the power that Henry 8th had, he would have sorted the "disagreement" out swiftly :flutter:


The elephant in the room there is that they wouldn't have gotten married, nor been allowed to pursue a relationship at all beyond a secret physical one, in the first place.

[Marsh.]

an innocent remark isnt racism

in many ways it just devalues actual racial hatred

You were there were you?

No. Didn't think so.

[Cherie]

If we're going to have kings and queens at all, I don't think we want a petty king who holds grudges? But that's what I mean really; it would be interesting to know if it really was The Queen's decision, or if it was someone else's decision but they think it sounds better if it's put down to "Boss's choice".

We don't don't what the grudge is about, I believe Harry was speaking about Wills when he mentioned Archies skin colour

I think it it too soon to mend bridges, and the Queen has diplomatically taken the decision, though in truth obviously neither of them wanted to stand side by side

[bots]

if they want to discuss things or not ... they still have plenty opportunity outwith the funeral. Personally, i think there is a lot more behind the rift between them than is public knowledge. When Harry chose to have his own charity separate from Will's, some disagreement led to that parting, and that happened long before H & M stepped down

[Cherie]

if they want to discuss things or not ... they still have plenty opportunity outwith the funeral. Personally, i think there is a lot more behind the rift between them than is public knowledge. When Harry chose to have his own charity separate from Will's, some disagreement led to that parting, and that happened long before H & M stepped down

Yep it has been going on for a while

[user104658]

if they want to discuss things or not ... they still have plenty opportunity outwith the funeral. Personally, i think there is a lot more behind the rift between them than is public knowledge. When Harry chose to have his own charity separate from Will's, some disagreement led to that parting, and that happened long before H & M stepped down


Most likely (although disclaimer; I obviously don't know) is that it's down to William being in line for the throne. Harry feels a lot of anger and resentment over the treatment of Diana and ending up without a mum at a very young age, William can't really afford to hold onto feelings like that because he's destined to be at the top of it all. You can see why it would lead to frustration, on both sides.

[bots]

Most likely (although disclaimer; I obviously don't know) is that it's down to William being in line for the throne. Harry feels a lot of anger and resentment over the treatment of Diana and ending up without a mum at a very young age, William can't really afford to hold onto feelings like that because he's destined to be at the top of it all. You can see why it would lead to frustration, on both sides.

to me, the most likely reason is that Harry has someone now that says ... hey Harry, you can't let him away with that and has given him the courage to stand up for himself rather than quiet acceptance that probably happened in the past

[thesheriff443]

Most likely (although disclaimer; I obviously don't know) is that it's down to William being in line for the throne. Harry feels a lot of anger and resentment over the treatment of Diana and ending up without a mum at a very young age, William can't really afford to hold onto feelings like that because he's destined to be at the top of it all. You can see why it would lead to frustration, on both sides.

Diana put herself in that position, one of the stupidest things was her not wearing a seatbelt if she had she would have survived

She died of a laceration of the liver

Conspiracy theories have been around for years saying she was killed on the orders of Prince Philip

[rusticgal]

It's more interesting that you felt the need to clarify your own position, if the situation was reversed, I wouldn't feel the need to clarify because I knew a post like that wouldn't apply to me.


Where did I insinuate I was "just clarifying my own position"....????

[arista]

[Complain to Ofcom after Julia Hartley-Brewer 'on ITV1HD'
makes a dig at Meghan Markle over
Royal Family photograph
saying 'she probably thinks it's racist']

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-9478453/This-Morning-viewers-complain-Ofcom-Julia-Hartley-Brewer-makes-dig-Meghan-Markle.html

[user104658]

Diana put herself in that position, one of the stupidest things was her not wearing a seatbelt if she had she would have survived

She died of a laceration of the liver

Conspiracy theories have been around for years saying she was killed on the orders of Prince Philip

It's a bit more complicated than that. Her life and the years leading up to her death were not happy ones, and she didn't end up speeding through the streets of Paris without a seatbelt on completely at random. His thinking might not be 100% spot on or logical but :shrug: it's their mum and she died young, it's obviously going to be a topic with high-emotions for both Harry and William, so if it's something they don't see eye to eye on then obviously it's going to be a source of frustration.

[jet]

If we're going to have kings and queens at all, I don't think we want a petty king who holds grudges?

Speak for yourself. I want a King who loves and cares enough about his family to mind very much that his brother and his wife spoke badly of them in front of millions, (and a lot of it lies too). Just because you wouldn’t mind and think yourself 'petty' for caring, doesn’t mean ‘we’ think that would make him in any way an unsuitable King. Quite the opposite.

[rusticgal]

Speak for yourself. I want a King who loves and cares enough about his family to mind very much that his brother and his wife spoke badly of them in front of millions, (and a lot of it lies too).


:clap1:

I could not agree more..

[Tom4784]

Are people still clinging desperately to their lies that Harry and Will attacked their family? It's quite sad how people cling to fake narratives.

[rusticgal]

Are people still clinging desperately to their lies that Harry and Will attacked their family? It's quite sad how people cling to fake narratives.


When did Wiliam attack his family and call them racist????

[jet]

People are still clinging desperately to their denial that Harry and Meghan attacked his family. Or they refuse to admit it. Take your pick.

[jet]

Where did I insinuate I was "just clarifying my own position"....????

You didn't.

[Tom4784]

It's a shame that people can't distinguish between their own fan fiction and reality. They did not attack the royal family, they criticised the firm and were highly complimentary of the queen.

Pretending otherwise doesn't make it true, just like pretending the earth is flat doesn't change the fact that it's round or that making out that vaccines give you autism when they obviously don't. Clinging to a false narrative and desperately believing it to be true does not make it true.

[jet]

When did Wiliam attack his family and call them racist????

He didn't.

[Tom4784]

And neither did Harry, but let's not let the facts get in the way of obssessive hatred.

[jet]

It's a shame that people can't distinguish between their own fan fiction and reality. They did not attack the royal family, they criticised the firm and were highly complimentary of the queen.

Pretending otherwise doesn't make it true, just like pretending the earth is flat doesn't change the fact that it's round or that making out that vaccines give you autism when they obviously don't. Clinging to a false narrative and desperately believing it to be true does not make it true.

They did, Meghan more so, pretending otherwise is full - on refusal to accept facts.

[thesheriff443]

And neither did Harry, but let's not let the facts get in the way of obssessive hatred.

Obsessive hatred, ain’t heard that clam in a while not
No one is going to change their opinions of Meghan no matter how much you flog a dead horse.

[bots]

it's a shame that some people consistently find issue and fault with those that oppose their views rather than sticking to what was said by the couple

[rusticgal]

And neither did Harry, but let's not let the facts get in the way of obssessive hatred.


So what point was he and Meghan making when they referred to a member of the family question Archies skin colour....???

[Cherie]

So what point was he and Meghan making when they referred to a member of the family question Archies skin colour....???

A term of endearment :laugh:

[rusticgal]

A term of endearment :laugh:


:hehe:...have we misunderstood it all along :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

it's a shame that some people consistently find issue and fault with those that oppose their views rather than sticking to what was said by the couple

well said

[rusticgal]

it's a shame that some people consistently find issue and fault with those that oppose their views rather than sticking to what was said by the couple



Thank you...the voice of reason :cheer2:

[user104658]

it's a shame that some people consistently find issue and fault with those that oppose their views rather than sticking to what was said by the couple

I guess, if you like crippling debates by walling off perfectly reasonable and relevant lines of discussion :think:. I know that's the official TiBB line but it's not the real world is it. Personal opinion, bias, and prejudice (obviously) does play a role in every debate and pretending otherwise is just... meh... a fake debate not worth having.

[Parmy]

The real world..

People use the real world that they experience to form thier opinions..

So this is the real world, actually.

[user104658]

The real world..

People use the real world that they experience to form thier opinions..

So this is the real world, actually.

Yes exactly Parmy; pretending that debates exist in a vacuum separate to the experiences and worldviews of those involved in the debate is not "real". Thus, "finding issue and fault with those that oppose one's views" is an integral part of a full and open debate. A sanitised "debate" where one has to pretend that debators don't bring external factors to the table is ... a big ol' pile of nothing.

[Tom4784]

They did, Meghan more so, pretending otherwise is full - on refusal to accept facts.

They didn't, Shall we go to the actual quotes and video clips? Choosing to misconstrue something to fit your agenda doesn't make it a fact.

it's a shame that some people consistently find issue and fault with those that oppose their views rather than sticking to what was said by the couple

I have too much self respect to allow lies and fake narratives to go unchallenged.

So what point was he and Meghan making when they referred to a member of the family question Archies skin colour....???

So you're more offended for the unknown Royal family member who said the remark than you are of the remark itself.

Interesting.

If they wanted to attack the royal family, they would have mentioned names, they would have gone for the jugular, but they did not. They didn't insult the queen, they didn't insult the royal family, anyone who can see the facts for what they are will tell you that.

[Marsh.]

So what point was he and Meghan making when they referred to a member of the family question Archies skin colour....???

A term of endearment :laugh:

:hehe:...have we misunderstood it all along :laugh:

Again, take issue with the calling out of racism rather than the racism itself. Typical.

[Parmy]

Yes exactly Parmy; pretending that debates exist in a vacuum separate to the experiences and worldviews of those involved in the debate is not "real". Thus, "finding issue and fault with those that oppose one's views" is an integral part of a full and open debate. A sanitised "debate" where one has to pretend that debators don't bring external factors to the table is ... a big ol' pile of nothing.

That hurt my reading glasses.

Not sure if I agree or not.:shrug:

[Parmy]

Again, take issue with the calling out of racism rather than the racism itself. Typical.

What racism?

[jet]

They didn't, Shall we go to the actual quotes and video clips? Choosing to misconstrue something to fit your agenda doesn't make it a fact.

I don't need them, I watched the whole interview, but if you do, go for it. Look out for all the lies too.

[rusticgal]

So you're more offended for the unknown Royal family member who said the remark than you are of the remark itself.

Interesting.

.


I never said that...and you know it. I was responding to the fact you said they never said anything to offend the Royal family...and I simply put you right.

[Tom4784]

I don't need them, I watched the whole interview, but if you do, go for it. Look out for all the lies too.

Just because you don't like what was said in that interview, doesn't make it a lie.

I never said that...and you know it. I was responding to the fact you said they never said anything to offend the Royal family...and I simply put you right.

Okay, I'm gonna explain it to you. This interaction started with me making this post.

Are people still clinging desperately to their lies that Harry and Will attacked their family? It's quite sad how people cling to fake narratives.

To which you responded with this.

When did Wiliam attack his family and call them racist????

Here, we can see that you believe Harry speaking about a family member that he refuses to identify for their sake and their racist comment. You said as much in this post that you consider it an attack, thus you are more offended by the accusation of racism than you are of the act of racism itself.

Let's carry on, shall we? I responded to that post by saying that Harry didn't attack his family and you doubled down with this.

So what point was he and Meghan making when they referred to a member of the family question Archies skin colour....???

Here you basically re-iterate that Harry speaking about a racist incident but not exposing the person in question is an attack on the royal family, you don't seem too bothered about the racist remarks, but you see them revealing such an incident has taken place as an attack on the royal family.

You didn't 'put me right' about anything, you simply weren't keeping track of what you said previously. Hell, you even messed up in this post and said that what Harry said was an offense to the royal family. Another instance of you considering the revealing of such an incident as more offensive than the incident itself.

[Marsh.]

What racism?

Racism racism.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/04/17/16/41878612-9481651-Prince_Harry_and_Prince_William_walk_next_to_each_ other_as_they_-a-387_1618672102364.jpg

[Prince Harry and Prince William walk next to each other as they leave the funeral]

[Marsh.]

Omg they look absolutely FURIOUS with each other.

:hehe:

[Liam-]

You can’t tell because of the masks, but they’re whispering death threats to eachother

[thesheriff443]

William is saying to the arch bishop, see this medal on my chest well it’s actually a throwing star made to look like a medal and when Harry’s back is turned I’m going to let him have it right in his bald bonce

[joeysteele]

It was really welcome to see the 2 Princes walking from the Chapel together back to the State rooms with Kate too.

Just really good luck to all of them.

[Parmy]

Anyone know how much we've had to fork out for the letch.:shrug:

[arista]

20,000 pounds

[Niamh.]

It was his grandfathers funeral ffs

[Parmy]

It was his grandfathers funeral ffs

So what...

He should have paid it himself the scrounging fop

[Niamh.]

So what...

He should have paid it himself the scrounging fop

Why should he?, the only reason he needs security is because he was born in to that family and life, it's not his fault :shrug:

[rusticgal]

So what...

He should have paid it himself the scrounging fop


..."scrounging fop"...:laugh:

[GoldHeart]

So what...

He should have paid it himself the scrounging fop

You being serious?

[joeysteele]

Why should he?, the only reason he needs security is because he was born in to that family and life, it's not his fault :shrug:

Exactly Niamh.

Just when it's thought the criticisms can't get any worse, along worse ones come.

I doubt myself Prince Philip who had a sense of humour would have been impressed with this latest one.

[jet]

SARAH VINE: Kate Middleton showed again at Prince Philip's funeral that she's a class act who can be the monarchy's new rock
By SARAH VINE

……………..Knowing, perhaps, that with the world’s cameras on the three of them the brothers would be less likely to make a spectacle, she extended the hand of friendship to Harry and drew him into conversation.
Whatever her own feelings about what was said about her in the interview, she put them aside for the sake of the greater good: an opportunity to turn what was a deeply sad occasion into one, perhaps, tinged with hope. And she did it with such effortless charm and generosity of spirit.

Who knows whether Harry and William’s exchange will go any way towards beginning to bridge the gap between them; but God love Kate for giving it a go. For seeing the bigger picture and putting their happiness ahead of her own satisfaction.
And what a stark contrast, it must be said, to that other royal consort, out in sunny Santa Barbara, always so quick to take offence, always so keen to be cast as the victim.
Well, she can say whatever she likes: the quiet sincerity of the Duchess of Cambridge’s good heart is all the truth we need to know.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9484879/SARAH-VINE-Kate-class-act-monarchys-rock.html

[AnnieK]

SARAH VINE: Kate Middleton showed again at Prince Philip's funeral that she's a class act who can be the monarchy's new rock
By SARAH VINE

……………..Knowing, perhaps, that with the world’s cameras on the three of them the brothers would be less likely to make a spectacle, she extended the hand of friendship to Harry and drew him into conversation.
Whatever her own feelings about what was said about her in the interview, she put them aside for the sake of the greater good: an opportunity to turn what was a deeply sad occasion into one, perhaps, tinged with hope. And she did it with such effortless charm and generosity of spirit.

Who knows whether Harry and William’s exchange will go any way towards beginning to bridge the gap between them; but God love Kate for giving it a go. For seeing the bigger picture and putting their happiness ahead of her own satisfaction.
And what a stark contrast, it must be said, to that other royal consort, out in sunny Santa Barbara, always so quick to take offence, always so keen to be cast as the victim.
Well, she can say whatever she likes: the quiet sincerity of the Duchess of Cambridge’s good heart is all the truth we need to know.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9484879/SARAH-VINE-Kate-class-act-monarchys-rock.html

Articles like this really make my blood boil. If I were Kate, I would be pissed off. They always manage to make anything good come back to Meghan. Rather than just be complimentary about Kate, they have to use her actions as a stick to beat Meghan with. Its just ridiculous.

[bots]

Articles like this really make my blood boil. If I were Kate, I would be pissed off. They always manage to make anything good come back to Meghan. Rather than just be complimentary about Kate, they have to use her actions as a stick to beat Meghan with. Its just ridiculous.

i would go further, it's actually a vomit inducing article. Mills and Boon

[AnnieK]

i would go further, it's actually a vomit inducing article. Mills and Boon

This too :laugh:

[thesheriff443]

I don’t take news papers seriously, we don’t have control of what they write but we do have control of what we believe

[jet]

Here's one you lot might like better. :joker:

url]https://www.entertainmentdaily.co.uk/royals/news-prince-andrew-sympathetic-to-prince-harry-amid-frostiness-from-royal-family/[/url]

Prince Andrew ‘sympathetic to Prince Harry amid frostiness from Royal Family’
Laura Hannam

In the latest news on Prince Harry following the Duke of Edinburgh’s funeral, Prince Andrew is reportedly the only member of the Royal Family that feels sorry for him.
The Duke of York apparently has sympathy for Harry amid ‘frostiness’ from the other royals on his return to the UK.

A new report claims that several senior royals failed to acknowledge the Duke of Sussex as he arrived for Prince Philip’s funeral on Saturday (April 17).
It’s claimed that Andrew knows how Harry is feeling.

The Duke of York stepped down as a senior Royal in late 2019, amid his connections to the sex offender.
A source told The Mail on Sunday: “Ironically the only one who has expressed any sympathy towards [Harry] is Prince Andrew.
“He knows from Sarah Ferguson – and now first-hand – how it feels to be the outsider, which Harry very much is.
“As far as the others are concerned, there is a deep sense of protection towards the Queen and resentment towards Harry.”

[AnnieK]

I don’t take news papers seriously, we don’t have control of what they write but we do have control of what we believe

You're quite right....too many articles are posted and referred to as gospel. I believe Kate is the.perfect wife for William and will be a fantastic consort when the time comes. I also don't believe that Meghan is the devil incarnate as a lot of these articles would have us believe.

In the world as it stands at the moment with massive issues of mental health problems, economic crisis, a global pandemic etc etc.....the inner wrangling of a multi million pound family pales into insignificance

[AnnieK]

Here's one you lot might like better. :joker:

url]https://www.entertainmentdaily.co.uk/royals/news-prince-andrew-sympathetic-to-prince-harry-amid-frostiness-from-royal-family/[/url]

Prince Andrew ‘sympathetic to Prince Harry amid frostiness from Royal Family’
Laura Hannam

In the latest news on Prince Harry following the Duke of Edinburgh’s funeral, Prince Andrew is reportedly the only member of the Royal Family that feels sorry for him.
The Duke of York apparently has sympathy for Harry amid ‘frostiness’ from the other royals on his return to the UK.

A new report claims that several senior royals failed to acknowledge the Duke of Sussex as he arrived for Prince Philip’s funeral on Saturday (April 17).
It’s claimed that Andrew knows how Harry is feeling.

The Duke of York stepped down as a senior Royal in late 2019, amid his connections to the sex offender.
A source told The Mail on Sunday: “Ironically the only one who has expressed any sympathy towards [Harry] is Prince Andrew.
“He knows from Sarah Ferguson – and now first-hand – how it feels to be the outsider, which Harry very much is.
“As far as the others are concerned, there is a deep sense of protection towards the Queen and resentment towards Harry.”

Yeah, a lot of people will be happy that a possible / probable sex offender feels sorry for Harry???

Dear lord

[jet]

Yeah, a lot of people will be happy that a possible / probable sex offender feels sorry for Harry???

Dear lord

Did you miss the laughing emoticon? :fist: :hehe:

[jet]

I don’t take news papers seriously, we don’t have control of what they write but we do have control of what we believe

I watched the whole service and Kate did what they said though. Harry was totally blanked as everyone was leaving the service. Outside, Kate started talking pleasantly to him, then when she and William moved off Harry caught up with them.
After a minute or two of chatting to him she hung back to talk to Sophie Wessex to give the brothers time on their own.

[thesheriff443]

I watched the whole service and Kate did what they said though. Harry was totally blanked as everyone was leaving the service. Outside, Kate started talking pleasantly to him, then when she and William moved off Harry caught up with them.
After a minute or two of chatting to him she hung back to talk to Sophie Wessex to give the brothers time on their own.

Yes take nothing away from Kate but you he bit in the article about Meghan is not needed

[Cherie]

Future Queen Kate the peacemaker :love:

[Vicky.]

A new report claims that several senior royals failed to acknowledge the Duke of Sussex as he arrived for Prince Philip’s funeral on Saturday

Sorry, if thats true, thats quite disgusting really. Especially given the day it was. Could at least be civil. Point blank ignoring him, on the day of his grandads funeral is quite crappy behaviour tbh. But not entirely surprising. But of course, its he and Meghan who are creating and maintaining 'the rift'.

[user104658]

Sorry, if thats true, thats quite disgusting really. Especially given the day it was. Could at least be civil. Point blank ignoring him, on the day of his grandads funeral is quite crappy behaviour tbh. But not entirely surprising. But of course, its he and Meghan who are creating and maintaining 'the rift'.

If it's true it only confirms that they were right to move away :shrug:. I honestly believe it as well. I think William and Kate probably want to build bridges, but there are PLENTY of other Royals where I can entirely believe that they would pointedly ignore him.

On the plus side, it does seem like the younger generation are MAYBE going to handle their family relationships better than they have been historically. Certainly William's family seems much more like a normal bunch of parents and kids than the previous generations. The newest generation of princes and princesses might actually stand a chance of growing up emotionally healthy :omgno:.

[Livia]

The truth is, every single opinion on here is guesswork. No one knows. Harry came back for his grandfather's funeral - good for him. Kate drew him into conversation - good for her. Honestly, I'm reading about his "overbearing family" and other comments from people who have not the first clue about the royal family. I don't see why people are getting so vicious with other people because they like an actress who was in a series once. Give them their privacy, it's what they said they wanted.

[joeysteele]

Articles like this really make my blood boil. If I were Kate, I would be pissed off. They always manage to make anything good come back to Meghan. Rather than just be complimentary about Kate, they have to use her actions as a stick to beat Meghan with. Its just ridiculous.


You've said all I want to.
Really in my opinion the article isn't worthy of any valid recognition whatsoever.
In my personal view.

[user104658]

You've said all I want to.
Really in my opinion the article isn't worthy of any valid recognition whatsoever.
In my personal view.

The truth is, every single opinion in these articles is guesswork. No one knows. Harry came back for his grandfather's funeral - good for him. Kate drew him into conversation - good for her. Honestly, I'm reading about his "awful wife who has him under the thumb" and other comments from people who have not the first clue about their family. I don't see why people are getting so vicious with other people because they like The Royals who are just another family at the end of the day. Give them freedom from this constant press barrage, it's what they said they wanted.

[Kazanne]

Sorry, if thats true, thats quite disgusting really. Especially given the day it was. Could at least be civil. Point blank ignoring him, on the day of his grandads funeral is quite crappy behaviour tbh. But not entirely surprising. But of course, its he and Meghan who are creating and maintaining 'the rift'.

I dont believe that's true ,its just the media spinning things to make up stories, the internet is mad aswell, they claim they have all got on so well ,next minute they didn't speak ,this is why I ignore the manic media, we saw those pics of Harry,kate and Wlliam getting on, the media really want there to be a rift t gets them sales and viewers.

[user104658]

they claim they have all got on so well ,next minute they didn't speak

They've gotten themselves into a catch 22;

"We must make Harry and Meghan look bad!"
"We'll say no one talked to Harry he's an outcast hee hee"
"Hee hee yeah!"
"We must make Kate look really good!"
"We'll say she's an amazing diplomat and got Harry and William talking!"
"Yeah!"
"Yeah!!"
"Wait... but if we say that Kate and William were talking to Harry that makes it look like they don't hate him and then other people might think things are OK..."
"We'll say no one talked to Harry he's an outcast hee hee!"
"Hee hee yeah!!"
"But that makes the family look petty!"
"Yeah we'll say he talked to them!"
"Yeah!"
"But..."

[jet]

For TS. :hee:

https://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/britain/prince-harry-will-return-to-us-without-meeting-charles-in-private-40333202.html

Britain’s Prince Harry will return to California without having a private meeting with his father.

Many family members had hoped the pair would take the opportunity to spend some time together alone, to air their differences face to face. But despite a 16,000km round trip, Harry was either unable, or unwilling, to pin down Prince Charles, who is still coming to terms with the death of his father....

Prince Charles (72) was said to have been furious about Harry and Meghan’s decision to discuss private family matters on television and he felt “let down” by his son and daughter-in-law. A source close to him said the “incendiary” interview had caused pain and division and that trust in the couple had been eroded.

“It goes against everything the Prince of Wales (Charles) believes in. He believes diversity is the strength of our society,” one source told a newspaper. “The Duke of Sussex (Harry) continues to say he respects his grandmother, but he has ridden roughshod over the institution she represents.”

[Niamh.]

For TS. :hee:

https://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/britain/prince-harry-will-return-to-us-without-meeting-charles-in-private-40333202.html

Britain’s Prince Harry will return to California without having a private meeting with his father.

Many family members had hoped the pair would take the opportunity to spend some time together alone, to air their differences face to face. But despite a 16,000km round trip, Harry was either unable, or unwilling, to pin down Prince Charles, who is still coming to terms with the death of his father....

Prince Charles (72) was said to have been furious about Harry and Meghan’s decision to discuss private family matters on television and he felt “let down” by his son and daughter-in-law. A source close to him said the “incendiary” interview had caused pain and division and that trust in the couple had been eroded.

“It goes against everything the Prince of Wales (Charles) believes in. He believes diversity is the strength of our society,” one source told a newspaper. “The Duke of Sussex (Harry) continues to say he respects his grandmother, but he has ridden roughshod over the institution she represents.”

The grand moral Prince Charles eh? At least Harry is loyal to his wife and mother of his children..........

[Crimson Dynamo]

Prince Harry's new 'CHIMPO' job title sparks hilarity in Japan... where the word is slang for
'penis'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9490419/Prince-Harrys-new-CHIMPO-job-title-sparks-hilarity-Japan.html

[user104658]

For TS. :hee:

https://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/britain/prince-harry-will-return-to-us-without-meeting-charles-in-private-40333202.html

Britain’s Prince Harry will return to California without having a private meeting with his father.

Many family members had hoped the pair would take the opportunity to spend some time together alone, to air their differences face to face. But despite a 16,000km round trip, Harry was either unable, or unwilling, to pin down Prince Charles, who is still coming to terms with the death of his father....

Prince Charles (72) was said to have been furious about Harry and Meghan’s decision to discuss private family matters on television and he felt “let down” by his son and daughter-in-law. A source close to him said the “incendiary” interview had caused pain and division and that trust in the couple had been eroded.

“It goes against everything the Prince of Wales (Charles) believes in. He believes diversity is the strength of our society,” one source told a newspaper. “The Duke of Sussex (Harry) continues to say he respects his grandmother, but he has ridden roughshod over the institution she represents.”

"We'll say it was Harry's responsibility to pin down Charles for a chat and that he couldn't be bothered hee hee!"

"Hee hee!"

[jet]

The grand moral Prince Charles eh? At least Harry is loyal to his wife and mother of his children..........

Can't disagree with that! :hehe:

[Niamh.]

Prince Harry's new 'CHIMPO' job title sparks hilarity in Japan... where the word is slang for
'penis'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9490419/Prince-Harrys-new-CHIMPO-job-title-sparks-hilarity-Japan.html

Just googled Chief Impact Officer and every job advert for one is shortened to CIO, there is a Musical Artist called Chimpo though, the Japanese must be doubled over every time his music is played

[AnnieK]

"We'll say it was Harry's responsibility to pin down Charles for a chat and that he couldn't be bothered hee hee!"

"Hee hee!"

The article even says was unable or unwilling.....so quite possibly Charles wasn't available. Its hilarious. These sources are rubbish and can't even get a full non story now :laugh:

[bots]

there is no point in meeting/talking or anything else if either of the parties is not ready for it yet. It wouldn't achieve anything and could make things worse. I just don't understand why people are so fixated on it .... i can't think of anything less interesting than knowing if people i have no affinity with are talking or not

[jet]

The article even says was unable or unwilling.....so quite possibly Charles wasn't available. Its hilarious. These sources are rubbish and can't even get a full non story now :laugh:

Yeah, who knows what to believe. At least we know what to believe regarding Meghan's morals, as the lies and exaggerations came straight from her own mouth.

[user104658]

Yeah, who knows what to believe. At least we know what to believe regarding Meghan's morals, as the lies and exaggerations came straight from her own mouth.

Hee hee 😂

[rusticgal]

Yeah, who knows what to believe. At least we know what to believe regarding Meghan's morals, as the lies and exaggerations came straight from her own mouth.


...for all to see.

[rusticgal]

Maybe we will here all what was discussed from Gayle King...:laugh:

[jet]

Maybe we will here all what was discussed from Gayle King...:laugh:

Wouldn't be surprised at all. :laugh:

[Tom4784]

It's sad people still cling to these... I'm not going to call them articles.... Arsepulls is probably a better term.

Anything that makes Harry and Meghan look bad is instantly the truth, despite the massive inconsistency in the.... 'reporting'... Even though it's bull****, I couldn't imagine cheering on the narrative that his family ignored him at the funeral or that his father didn't want to talk to him, how warped does a person have to be to take pleasure in such cruelty?

[user104658]

...for all to see.

😂

[jet]

Dezzy:

Anything that makes Harry and Meghan look bad is instantly the truth.

Not necessarily.

Even though it's bull****, I couldn't imagine cheering on the narrative that his family ignored him at the funeral or that his father didn't want to talk to him, how warped does a person have to be to take pleasure in such cruelty?

Who’s cheering it on? :conf:

[user104658]

Who’s cheering it on? :conf:

You, rusticgal, frequently LT, Pier, the entire DM comments section...

[jet]

You, rusticgal, frequently LT, Pier, the entire DM comments section...

There were no posts here that cheered on that Harry was ignored at the funeral or his father wouldn't talk to him. You're making it up.

[user104658]

There were no posts here that cheered on that Harry was ignored at the funeral or his father wouldn't talk to him. You're making it up.

😂

[rusticgal]

There were no posts here that cheered on that Harry was ignored at the funeral or his father wouldn't talk to him. You're making it up.


I havent even mentioned it....:laugh:

Wheres the evidence????

[Tom4784]

Try looking through various posts in this thread and others about Prince Phillip, for a start.

Although, you might not find much, if you aren't willing to look at your own posts with some form of objectivity.

[jet]

Try looking through various posts in this thread and others about Prince Phillip, for a start.

Although, you might not find much, if you aren't willing to look at your own posts with some form of objectivity.

There was nobody here that cheered on that Harry was ignored at the funeral or his father wouldn't talk to him as you implied. You were wrong.

[Tom4784]

There was nobody here that cheered on that Harry was ignored at the funeral or his father wouldn't talk to him as you implied. You were wrong.

Ignoring the facts does not eradicate them.

You and others have judged how Harry grieves his own loss, not yours, based off of gossip rags, people are blatantly pleased by the idea of the ridiculous idea of the royals ignoring Harry at the funeral.

There is no point in lying to me because I see through it, clearly. You are a pane of glass to me. You're only lying to yourself at this point because everyone who isn't simply telling you what you want to hear can see it just as clear for themselves.

[user104658]

There was nobody here that cheered on that Harry was ignored at the funeral or his father wouldn't talk to him as you implied. You were wrong.


False. There has been abundant cheering and gloating over anything that can possibly paint either Harry or preferably Meghan (but Harry will do as a proxy) as “bad”, since the second they left the UK. Including things related to his own grandfather’s funeral.

[emoji23]

[thesheriff443]

False. There has been abundant cheering and gloating over anything that can possibly paint either Harry or preferably Meghan (but Harry will do as a proxy) as “bad”, since the second they left the UK. Including things related to his own grandfather’s funeral.

[emoji23]

Queen Meghan and king dick anyone

[user104658]

king dick

https://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/god_damn_right_breaking_bad.gif

[thesheriff443]

https://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/god_damn_right_breaking_bad.gif

Put your one eyed worm away son this is serious debates

[jet]

Ignoring the facts does not eradicate them.

You and others have judged how Harry grieves his own loss, not yours, based off of gossip rags, people are blatantly pleased by the idea of the ridiculous idea of the royals ignoring Harry at the funeral.

Once again, there was nobody here that cheered on that Harry was ignored at the funeral or his father wouldn't talk to him.

Also, he wasn’t ignored. I posted that William and Kate both spoke to him.
Others could have done so afterwards. Nor did I judge how he should grieve.
Stop blatantly lying to me/attempting to mind read and failing.

[jet]

False. There has been abundant cheering and gloating over anything that can possibly paint either Harry or preferably Meghan (but Harry will do as a proxy) as “bad”, since the second they left the UK. Including things related to his own grandfather’s funeral.

[emoji23]

Hee hee. :laugh:

[rusticgal]

False. There has been abundant cheering and gloating over anything that can possibly paint either Harry or preferably Meghan (but Harry will do as a proxy) as “bad”, since the second they left the UK. Including things related to his own grandfather’s funeral.

[emoji23]


No one is cheering or gloating....thats your interpretation :hee:

[user104658]

No one is cheering or gloating....thats your interpretation :hee:

:hee: of course :hee: no one is gloating :hee:

[Vicky.]

:hee: of course :hee: no one is gloating :hee:

Should know by now, there is also absolutely 0 hate towards the couple. Ever. Just made up and misinterpretted over and over. Get with the programme! D:

[jet]

Should know by now, there is also absolutely 0 hate towards the couple. Ever. Just made up and misinterpretted over and over. Get with the programme! D:

If you read the last page or two, what is misinterpreted is saying that there was gloating and cheering because the family didn’t speak to Harry at the funeral, which is a lie, there was no cheering or anything like it (and additionally, some in the family did speak to him anyway). I don’t think a mod should be agreeing with people who lied about what posters said.
Yes, we dislike Meghan’s actions and Harry’s too to some extent, that has not been denied AT ALL, but being accused of things not said or felt is not on.

[Parmy]

Who is pier?

[Niamh.]

Who is pier?

did someone just forget the s?

[Parmy]

Pier doesn't gloat..he rages.

[user104658]

did someone just forget the s?

Smudgie's thread title, and as such he shall forever be known :flutter:

[Niamh.]

Smudgie's thread title, and as such he shall forever be known :flutter:

He sounds french now :laugh:

[user104658]

If you read the last page or two, what is misinterpreted is saying that there was gloating and cheering because the family didn’t speak to Harry at the funeral, which is a lie, there was no cheering or anything like it (and additionally, some in the family did speak to him anyway).

No one here is stupid jet, you're literally talking into the air. People have read the thread, and similar threads, and know what they're seeing. If you feel like you're being constantly "misinterpreted", by multiple people, there comes a time when you have to wonder whether it's how you're coming across rather than their "misinterpretation".

[jet]

No one here is stupid jet, you're literally talking into the air. People have read the thread, and similar threads, and know what they're seeing. If you feel like you're being constantly "misinterpreted", by multiple people, there comes a time when you have to wonder whether it's how you're coming across rather than their "misinterpretation".

Can you point out where I said I was constantly misinterpreted? I don't feel I am at all as I make myself very clear...
You know darn well I am only talking about, ONCE AGAIN, this and THIS ONLY:

what is misinterpreted is saying that there was gloating and cheering because the family didn’t speak to Harry at the funeral, which is a lie, there was no cheering or anything like it.

You are Dezzy baiting are not multiple people btw.

[user104658]

Can you point out where I said I was constantly misinterpreted? I don't feel I am at all as I make myself very clear...
You know darn well I am only talking about, ONCE AGAIN, this and THIS ONLY:


I think a lot of people see you quite clearly enjoying/relishing/gleefully exaggerating anything that paints Harry and Meghan in a negative light and "gloating and cheering" sums that up quite succinctly. Maybe I'm wrong but :shrug: that seems to be the "misinterpretation" that a lot of people have from a lot of what you post. I'm not even saying you're "not allowed to do that" - each to their own - but again if you find yourself being taken the wrong way, and you don't LIKE being taken the wrong way, it's sensible to think about how you're coming across and not just blame others for "getting you all wrong".

[jet]

I think a lot of people see you quite clearly enjoying/relishing/gleefully exaggerating anything that paints Harry and Meghan in a negative light and "gloating and cheering" sums that up quite succinctly. Maybe I'm wrong but :shrug: that seems to be the "misinterpretation" that a lot of people have from a lot of what you post. I'm not even saying you're "not allowed to do that" - each to their own - but again if you find yourself being taken the wrong way, and you don't LIKE being taken the wrong way, it's sensible to think about how you're coming across and not just blame others for "getting you all wrong".

What I post I always own, and I never feel misinterpreted as I know it is often being done to bait, but there is plenty of viciousness and relishing of and enjoyment of trashing my and others opinions who don't think Meghan in particular is beyond criticism.
What I won't have is people outright lying about what was actually said about Harry at the funereal and Rusti too, who didn't even mention it.
People opposing opinions is one thing, lying is another altogether.

[jet]

Sharon Osbourne has hit out at Prince Harry for complaining about being financially cut off from the Royal Family in his interview with Oprah Winfrey
By Molly Pike
07:31, 21 APR 2021

Sharon Osbourne has hit out against Prince Harry, calling him the "poster boy of white privilege".
The former X Factor judge criticised the Duke of Sussex for complaining about being cut off from the Royal Family during his interview with Oprah Winfrey.
She said she doesn't "feel empathy for Harry" as a "healthy, bright, educated young man" who is capable of being financially independent.
It comes after Sharon quit The Talk last month after she caused huge controversy for defending Piers Morgan over his comments about Meghan Markle.

Sharon addressed the row in a new interview on HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher, saying she is not racist.
Speaking about Harry, Sharon said: "You know when they say white privilege? You know, right there with Harry. Right there. He is the poster boy.
"So you know, he sits there and says 'Daddy cut him off and he's not on the wages anymore' and he was boohooing about it.
"You can't feel empathy for that. Because you're a healthy, bright, educated young man.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/sharon-osbourne-calls-prince-harry-23951956

Sharon is right there....not sure how 'bright' he is however. :hee:

[Marsh.]

The truth is, every single opinion in these articles is guesswork. No one knows. Harry came back for his grandfather's funeral - good for him. Kate drew him into conversation - good for her. Honestly, I'm reading about his "awful wife who has him under the thumb" and other comments from people who have not the first clue about their family. I don't see why people are getting so vicious with other people because they like The Royals who are just another family at the end of the day. Give them freedom from this constant press barrage, it's what they said they wanted.

:joker:

[Marsh.]

Sharon Osbourne has hit out at Prince Harry for complaining about being financially cut off from the Royal Family in his interview with Oprah Winfrey
By Molly Pike
07:31, 21 APR 2021

Sharon Osbourne has hit out against Prince Harry, calling him the "poster boy of white privilege".
The former X Factor judge criticised the Duke of Sussex for complaining about being cut off from the Royal Family during his interview with Oprah Winfrey.
She said she doesn't "feel empathy for Harry" as a "healthy, bright, educated young man" who is capable of being financially independent.
It comes after Sharon quit The Talk last month after she caused huge controversy for defending Piers Morgan over his comments about Meghan Markle.

Sharon addressed the row in a new interview on HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher, saying she is not racist.
Speaking about Harry, Sharon said: "You know when they say white privilege? You know, right there with Harry. Right there. He is the poster boy.
"So you know, he sits there and says 'Daddy cut him off and he's not on the wages anymore' and he was boohooing about it.
"You can't feel empathy for that. Because you're a healthy, bright, educated young man.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/sharon-osbourne-calls-prince-harry-23951956

Sharon is right there....not sure how 'bright' he is however. :hee:

"Sacked racist Sharon Osbourne, who clings onto relevance via her husband, talks to the mirror..."

:joker:

[jet]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2021/04/21/prince-harry-flies-home-meghan-misses-queens-95th-birthday/

Prince Harry returns to LA ahead of Queen's birthday as she celebrates in low-key fashion at Windsor
The Prince returned to the US to be with his pregnant wife and will not see his grandmother as she marks her 95th birthday today

ByVictoria Ward

The Duke of Sussex has returned home to California to be reunited with his wife and son, it was claimed today, ahead of the Queen's 95th birthday.
Prince Harry, 36, was said to have landed in Los Angeles on an American Airlines flight shortly after 1.30pm local time (9.30pm BST) on Tuesday.

His car was seen leaving the private terminal at LAX minutes after the plane landed and was spotted again arriving in Montecito at around 4pm, according to reports. The Duke’s spokesperson declined to comment.
His return means he will not see the Queen as she marks her 95th birthday today at Windsor Castle.
This year, the Queen's birthday will pass without a gun salute for a second time, as she continues to mourn the loss of her husband, the Duke of Edinburgh.
...................
ffs could he not have hung on for another day...

[rusticgal]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2021/04/21/prince-harry-flies-home-meghan-misses-queens-95th-birthday/

Prince Harry returns to LA ahead of Queen's birthday as she celebrates in low-key fashion at Windsor
The Prince returned to the US to be with his pregnant wife and will not see his grandmother as she marks her 95th birthday today

ByVictoria Ward

The Duke of Sussex has returned home to California to be reunited with his wife and son, it was claimed today, ahead of the Queen's 95th birthday.
Prince Harry, 36, was said to have landed in Los Angeles on an American Airlines flight shortly after 1.30pm local time (9.30pm BST) on Tuesday.

His car was seen leaving the private terminal at LAX minutes after the plane landed and was spotted again arriving in Montecito at around 4pm, according to reports. The Duke’s spokesperson declined to comment.
His return means he will not see the Queen as she marks her 95th birthday today at Windsor Castle.
This year, the Queen's birthday will pass without a gun salute for a second time, as she continues to mourn the loss of her husband, the Duke of Edinburgh.
...................
ffs could he not have hung on for another day...


Maybe she didnt want to see him...:wink:

[Cherie]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2021/04/21/prince-harry-flies-home-meghan-misses-queens-95th-birthday/

Prince Harry returns to LA ahead of Queen's birthday as she celebrates in low-key fashion at Windsor
The Prince returned to the US to be with his pregnant wife and will not see his grandmother as she marks her 95th birthday today

ByVictoria Ward

The Duke of Sussex has returned home to California to be reunited with his wife and son, it was claimed today, ahead of the Queen's 95th birthday.
Prince Harry, 36, was said to have landed in Los Angeles on an American Airlines flight shortly after 1.30pm local time (9.30pm BST) on Tuesday.

His car was seen leaving the private terminal at LAX minutes after the plane landed and was spotted again arriving in Montecito at around 4pm, according to reports. The Duke’s spokesperson declined to comment.
His return means he will not see the Queen as she marks her 95th birthday today at Windsor Castle.
This year, the Queen's birthday will pass without a gun salute for a second time, as she continues to mourn the loss of her husband, the Duke of Edinburgh.
...................
ffs could he not have hung on for another day...

tbf I don't see the issue, I never really get that people have to see each other on the day, she might have wanted a quite one after the funeral and she can only meet him outside anyway due to covid restrictions and I would say Liz is a stickler for da rules

[jet]

tbf I don't see the issue, I never really get that people have to see each other on the day, she might have wanted a quite one after the funeral and she can only meet him outside anyway due to covid restrictions and I would say Liz is a stickler for da rules

Yes I know but he hasn't seen her in well over a year and goodness knows when he will again. :sad:

[jet]

Maybe she didnt want to see him...:wink:

There is that of course. :wink: :hee:

[AnnieK]

Apparently, Harry met with the queen twice whilst he was here and spoke with Charles and William.

[Parmy]

Apparently, Harry met with the queen twice whilst he was here and spoke with Charles and William.

That's great news, I do hope he listened.

They have the diana memorial soon, the brothers.

I hope they do a massive bear hug on telly.

[joeysteele]

Apparently, Harry met with the queen twice whilst he was here and spoke with Charles and William.

She's in the official mourning period anyhow for the Duke of Edinburgh.
So she'll likely not be doing anything whatsoever on the day.

Of course they'll have met, I'd say you're right.

It's just petty nitpicking on every single thing Prince Harry and his wife does or doesn't do.
With some, no matter what they say or do, it will never be right.
Regardless of possibly whatever they say or do.

Unless they were to likely split up and Prince Harry return to the full control of the Royal set up.

As for the usually foul mouthed Sharon Osbourne.
When did she become a beacon of virtue and right.

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/8F61/production/_118150763_dailymail22.04.jpg

[Crimson Dynamo]

look were i was today :hehe:

https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=5174&stc=1&d=1619114991

look under the word St Andrews...

[arista]

How Nice
LT

[Crimson Dynamo]

1385473981461979137

[bots]

So what is my response. It's a picture fgs :laugh:

[Marsh.]

That jealous woman carrying her child in public areas!!!

She could keep that kid locked up! Grrrr!!!

[Crimson Dynamo]

1385474263688392704

[Marsh.]

She needs a new handle.

@sadact83

[thesheriff443]

Meghan has been at it again releasing information to people magazine in America the same one that her friends spoke to last time that she and Archie had spoken to queen twice.

How on earth can anyone in the royal family trust them not to release information that’s no one’s business except them and the royal family.

[Marsh.]

Omg that top secret information THAT SHE'S SPOKEN TO HER HUSBAND'S GRANDMOTHER!!!!!

STOP THE PRESS!

[rusticgal]

I hope Meghan is suing the photographer...:hehe:


...and what a lovely endearing picture of George :love:

[Cherie]

What a coincidence!

[Cherie]

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/oprah-winfrey-meghan-markle-prince-harry-surprised-interview_n_6083d3e8e4b003896e0428b3?ri18n=true

Winfrey was stunned the Duchess of Sussex went “all the way there” with one particular part of their bombshell sit-down.

[jet]

1385474263688392704

She does that nearly every time there is a royal birthday or anniversary...and remember she announced her pregnancy at Eugene's wedding?
She has to have the attention on her. Narcissist?

[Marsh.]

How DARE she do what she likes!!! She is OUR prisoner!! Why doesn't she understand this yet? KNOW YOUR PLACE girl.

She can't stop us attacking her and then decide when to allow a picture of herself!!!! Does she think she has control over her own life? PAAA!!

[jet]

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/oprah-winfrey-meghan-markle-prince-harry-surprised-interview_n_6083d3e8e4b003896e0428b3?ri18n=true

Winfrey was stunned the Duchess of Sussex went “all the way there” with one particular part of their bombshell sit-down.

“They wanted to be able to tell their story and tell it in such a way that allowed them to be as truthful as possible.”


:joker:

[Jordan.]

She does that nearly every time there is a royal birthday or anniversary...and remember she announced her pregnancy at Eugene's wedding?
She has to have the attention on her. Narcissist?

and you give her it so well :flutter:

[rusticgal]

and you give her it so well :flutter:


Not really...Meghan only likes positive attention :laugh:

[Jordan.]

Not really...Meghan only likes positive attention :laugh:

oh that's the narrative we're going with today is it. I guess that makes her less of a monster than usual :laugh:

[jet]

and you give her it so well :flutter:

As if she'd be reading here and making a note of me criticising her and you defending her. :rolleyes:
Sorry to disappoint you. :laugh:

[Jordan.]

As if she'd be reading here and making a note of me criticising her and you defending her. :rolleyes:
Sorry to disappoint you. :laugh:

that's very true, all of your time you put into trashing her and she still has no idea you exist :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

She does that nearly every time there is a royal birthday or anniversary...and remember she announced her pregnancy at Eugene's wedding?
She has to have the attention on her. Narcissist?

yes she has form, its a dig at Kate

green-eyes monster....

[Marsh.]

"Mother walks in public with child"

Tibb: it's a dig

[Liam-]

Woman in ‘showing attention and love to their child’ shocker

No wonder she was the odd one out in that family

[jet]

that's very true, all of your time you put into trashing her and she still has no idea you exist :laugh:

all of your time you put into defending her and she still has no idea you exist :laugh:

[Jordan.]

all of your time you put into defending her and she still has no idea you exist :laugh:

my 17 posts in this thread opposed to your 116, I've got a lot of time wasting to do to catch up with you </3

[rusticgal]

Woman in ‘showing attention and love to their child’ shocker

No wonder she was the odd one out in that family


No...cos we have never seen William and Kate carry their children have we :laugh:

[Jordan.]

No...cos we have never seen William and Kate carry their children have we :laugh:

hopefully not on any anniversary of anything ever :fist:

[rusticgal]

hopefully not on any anniversary of anything ever :fist:


Nope...they dont play silly games. Too classy.

[Marsh.]

Says the woman who's never met any of them in her life.

[jet]

my 17 posts in this thread opposed to your 116, I've got a lot of time wasting to do to catch up with you </3

You have. There's a lot to criticise her for and not much you can defend. :laugh:

[Marsh.]

Imagine thinking you need to defend a woman.... living her life.

[Jordan.]

You have. There's a lot to criticise her for and not much you can defend. :laugh:

Reminder, you're mad over a women going for a walk.

[Jordan.]

1385361279687159810

[joeysteele]

Is she seriously getting grief for a photo of her with Archie being seen in media.
Honestly, how pathetic is that, in my personal view.

[Niamh.]

Is she seriously getting grief for a photo of her with Archie being seen in media.
Honestly, how pathetic is that, in my personal view.You have to laugh [emoji28]

[Jordan.]

Is she seriously getting grief for a photo of her with Archie being seen in media.
Honestly, how pathetic is that, in my personal view.

If people let a photo of Meghan and Archie divert their attention away from Louis' birthday (a 3 year old child they don't know) then that is on them.

[rusticgal]

If people let a photo of Meghan and Archie divert their attention away from Louis' birthday (a 3 year old child they don't know) then that is on them.


Well fortunately it didnt take anyones attention away...because Louis celebrated his birthday yesterday and it hasnt reached anyones attention until today....:laugh:

[Jordan.]

Well fortunately it didnt take anyones attention away...because Louis celebrated his birthday yesterday and it hasnt reached anyones attention until today....:laugh:

so what are you complaining about?

[Marsh.]

1385361279687159810

But BUT Meghan is in CHARGE!!!!!! :fist:

[rusticgal]

so what are you complaining about?

..where did I complain?????

[Marsh.]

I hope Meghan is suing the photographer...:hehe:


...and what a lovely endearing picture of George :love:

Not really...Meghan only likes positive attention :laugh:

Nope...they dont play silly games. Too classy.

You accused her of purposely getting herself photographed to pull focus and play games.

:crazy:

[GoldHeart]

Imagine thinking you need to defend a woman.... living her life.

I really don't envy Harry & Meghan, all this constant grief and nitpicking they get . They can't cough without being criticised :bored: .

[rusticgal]

I really don't envy Harry & Meghan, all this constant grief and nitpicking they get . They can't cough without being criticised :bored: .


Awww...don’t worry. She had the photo taken because she wanted the publicity...

[Marsh.]

Yeah, because unless her and her child stay behind closed doors they must want attention. :rolleyes:

[user104658]

Oh ffs I thought this thread had finally died.

[user104658]

Thing is though I’m busy tonight and tomorrow so I’m not going to be able to come on to remind you guys what a bunch of ****ing sadsacks you are until Monday.

[rusticgal]

Thing is though I’m busy tonight and tomorrow so I’m not going to be able to come on to remind you guys what a bunch of ****ing sadsacks you are until Monday.


Well that’s good because you are supposed to discuss the subject matter and not the forum members...:hehe:

[Tom4784]

Honestly, if I found myself getting mad over a woman pictured taking a walk and trying to make out that it's an attack on a child's birthday on the other side of the world, I'd seek psychological help.

[Parmy]

Honestly, if I found myself getting mad over a woman pictured taking a walk and trying to make out that it's an attack on a child's birthday on the other side of the world, I'd seek psychological help.

You should go and double check yourself for your responses to about 4 folk max, on a defunct forum, about nothing in particular.

[thesheriff443]

Thing is though I’m busy tonight and tomorrow so I’m not going to be able to come on to remind you guys what a bunch of ****ing sadsacks you are until Monday.

What you doing babysitting.

[thesheriff443]

Honestly, if I found myself getting mad over a woman pictured taking a walk and trying to make out that it's an attack on a child's birthday on the other side of the world, I'd seek psychological help.

You just don’t get no one cares what you think

[Crimson Dynamo]

Its seems that this couple continously trigger the very people who seem to support them?

its the same on SM

its baffling

[joeysteele]

Honestly, if I found myself getting mad over a woman pictured taking a walk and trying to make out that it's an attack on a child's birthday on the other side of the world, I'd seek psychological help.

I think I would too Dezzy.

Bizarre.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Honestly, if I found myself getting mad over a woman pictured taking a walk and trying to make out that it's an attack on a child's birthday on the other side of the world, I'd seek psychological help.

If you actually find someone getting "mad" on the forum letus all know who it is


As otherwise I can't think what you mean?🤔

[LukeB]

Thing is though I’m busy tonight and tomorrow so I’m not going to be able to come on to remind you guys what a bunch of ****ing sadsacks you are until Monday.

:joker: nice one

[jet]

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/harry-and-meghan-no-holiday-from-royal-feud-as-sussex-hagiography-gets-a-summer-update-whwjv5g32

Harry and Meghan: no holiday from royal feud as Sussex ‘hagiography’ gets a summer update
A new edition of Finding Freedom, which chronicles the couple’s new life, may reopen royal rifts

Finding Freedom, a flattering biography of Harry and Meghan, giving their account of their departure from royal life via friends and Sussex sources, is being updated with new chapters. They will cover their interview with Oprah Winfrey, allegations against Meghan over the bullying of royal staff, which she denies, and Prince Philip’s death.
..............

This very private couple keeping the world updated via their mouthpiece Omid in a Mills and Boon part 2. They will want to keep everyone informed about their latest experiences of being victimised I suppose. :smug:

[Amy Jade]

Don't read it then?

[jet]

Don't read it then?

I won't. Just letting you fans know so you can get it ordered pronto; help the sales. :dog: :laugh:

[joeysteele]

Don't read it then?

It is that simple isn't it Amy.:joker:

This fascination with people not liked absolutely confuses me.

[Amy Jade]

I won't. Just letting you fans know so you can get it ordered pronto; help the sales. :dog: :laugh:

I get the distinct feeling you'll be the one rushing out to buy it over me since you seem like a big fan going off of how much you've posted here.

[jet]

I get the distinct feeling you'll be the one rushing out to buy it over me since you seem like a big fan going off of how much you've posted here.

You need to distrust your distinct feelings then. :laugh:

[Marsh.]

No, Jet will let someone else read it and then proceed to read their writings about it that amount to more words than the actual book and then come here and parrot their opinions as though they're his own.

[rusticgal]

I get the distinct feeling you'll be the one rushing out to buy it over me since you seem like a big fan going off of how much you've posted here.


He isnt a fan :shrug:....that doesnt mean he cant have an opinion.

[Jordan.]

No, Jet will let someone else read it and then proceed to read their writings about it that amount to more words than the actual book and then come here and parrot their opinions as though they're his own.

:joker:

[Marsh.]

He isnt a fan :shrug:....that doesnt mean he cant have an opinion.

Parroting someone else's opinion on something you haven't read yourself is not an opinion.

[GoldHeart]

I won't. Just letting you fans know so you can get it ordered pronto; help the sales. :dog: :laugh:

Oh is that so :idc:
The hilarious thing is not even her 'fans' are this invested in her every breath and move.

[Amy Jade]

He isnt a fan :shrug:....that doesnt mean he cant have an opinion.

Why would you post your opinion though if you don't read it?

Make it make sense.

[rusticgal]

Why would you post your opinion though if you don't read it?

Make it make sense.


Because extracts are posted online...anything 'worth' reading which enables people to have an opinion.
Now...does that make sense :rolleyes:

[Vicky.]

1385473981461979137

Bloody hell..this is way beyond a joke now. Poor woman cannot even take her child out of the house as its another childs birthday?!

The level of obsession is a little scary tbh D:

[Vicky.]

1385361279687159810

Also if this is true, the press are more pathetic than I thought.

Even if it was on Louis' birthday, I dont see the issue. But if this was just made up nonsense (by press, obviously)..its genuinely pathetic.

[Amy Jade]

Because extracts are posted online...anything 'worth' reading which enables people to have an opinion.
Now...does that make sense :rolleyes:

Still doesn't because you've got people saying they don't care but then have an opinion that shows they care.

People love to hate.

[rusticgal]

Bloody hell..this is way beyond a joke now. Poor woman cannot even take her child out of the house as its another childs birthday?!

The level of obsession is a little scary tbh D:


Meghan sued a paparazzi agency over privacy rights for taking a picture of her taking Archie and her dog for a walk.
Lets see if she sues over this one...unless of course it was set up....:hehe:

[Amy Jade]

Bloody hell..this is way beyond a joke now. Poor woman cannot even take her child out of the house as its another childs birthday?!

The level of obsession is a little scary tbh D:

Exactly.

It's actually sickening.

[rusticgal]

Still doesn't because you've got people saying they don't care but then have an opinion that shows they care.

People love to hate.


Just because someone doesnt care enough to buy a book on someone they dont particularly like doesnt mean they cant have an opinion on that said person and their book :shrug:...you are not making sense.

[rusticgal]

People love to hate.


Like you have never shown any dislike towards any kind of celebrity on this forum....:laugh:

[GoldHeart]

There's dislike and then there's criticising and watching every move someone makes, Meghan is outside with her child and who cares .wowww what a pathetic slow day in the tabloid office it must be to beat her with a stick over this :bored: .

[Amy Jade]

Like you have never shown any dislike towards any kind of celebrity on this forum....:laugh:

Hopefully I've never stooped so low as to be pissed off that somebody took their child out. I'd be bloody ashamed of myself.

Why do you want to talk about me so badly though?

[rusticgal]

There's dislike and then there's criticising and watching every move someone makes, Meghan is outside with her child and who cares .wowww what a pathetic slow day in the tabloid office it must be to beat her with a stick over this :bored: .


Well Meghan cared when it happened a year ago....so it will be interesting if she reacts the same way this time. I mean this is a woman who values her privacy remember :laugh: