Harry and Meghan - Official Discussion Thread

[Amy Jade]

If she does act the same way people will slate her.

If she just leave it people will slate her.

Can't win :laugh:

[joeysteele]

Bloody hell..this is way beyond a joke now. Poor woman cannot even take her child out of the house as its another childs birthday?!

The level of obsession is a little scary tbh D:


It is quite scary really, I agree Vicky.

[rusticgal]

Hopefully I've never stooped so low as to be pissed off that somebody took their child out. I'd be bloody ashamed of myself.

Why do you want to talk about me so badly though?


Nobody is pissed off that she took her child out....where did you get that from? Its the principle of the photo that people are debating.
If someone wants to be pissed off with a photo then they will have their reasons...I hardly see that as 'stooping so low'.....when people take the piss out of someone for personal features...thats what I call 'stooping low' :laugh:.

[GoldHeart]

Well Meghan cared when it happened a year ago....so it will be interesting if she reacts the same way this time. I mean this is a woman who values her privacy remember :laugh:

What is the problem exactly ?? , she's gone outside with her child . Just look at the ridiculous fuss being made over it .

You realise I don't even care or know most of what Meghan is doing, it's usually stuff I see posted nitpicking and belittling her ever move. When the woman is just living her life.

And people say there isn't obsession & hate

YEAH right and pigs fly

[LukeB]

Some people need a hobby or something.... it’s just a photo of Meghan with her child :skull: theres nothing to talk about or debate it’s just a bloody picture. It shouldn’t even be a big deal but her haters are making it into one.

[Marsh.]

Some people need a hobby or something.... it’s just a photo of Meghan with her child :skull: theres nothing to talk about or debate it’s just a bloody picture. It shouldn’t even be a big deal but her haters are making it into one.

.

[GoldHeart]

Nobody is pissed off that she took her child out....where did you get that from? Its the principle of the photo that people are debating.
If someone wants to be pissed off with a photo then they will have their reasons...I hardly see that as 'stooping so low'.....when people take the piss out of someone for personal features...thats what I call 'stooping low' :laugh:.

Harry was constantly mocked for his hairline and it seemed ok, so I might aswell call William 'baldy baldy' :hee:

[Marsh.]

Harry was constantly mocked for his hairline and it seemed ok, so I might aswell call William 'baldy baldy' :hee:

The hypocrisy is astounding isn't it?

[Liam-]

The principle of a picture of a mother with her child? Crying out loud

[GoldHeart]

The hypocrisy is astounding isn't it?

Yep and a woman can't even take her child out for fresh air without being attacked for it :bored: .

[Glenn.]

Is this really where we are with the hatred now. A mother can’t even go outside with her child?

[Tom4784]

Honestly, this is disturbing as ****. Getting mad over the 'principle' of a mother out in public with her child? Making out that doing so is somehow an attack on someone else?

This is next level obssession. People who believe this kind of thinking probably won't be happy until she's dead, and even then they'd twist it to attack her. Unhealthy behaviour.

[rusticgal]

Getting mad over the 'principle' of a mother out in public with her child?

.



Where has anyone got mad over the 'principle' of a mother being out with a child....???? :joker:

[rusticgal]

Is this really where we are with the hatred now. A mother can’t even go outside with her child?


Who said a mother cant go out with her child???? :joker:

[rusticgal]

Yep and a woman can't even take her child out for fresh air without being attacked for it :bored: .


Who is attacking her for taking her child out in the fresh air???? :joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

1386107403607973894

[Jordan.]

Parroting someone else's opinion on something you haven't read yourself is not an opinion.

this seems to be a growing trend in serious debates.

[rusticgal]

this seems to be a growing trend in serious debates.


Maybe if false accusations were not made in the first place they wouldnt be questioned....

...as always nobody can highlight where these things have supposidly been said :laugh:

[thesheriff443]

Honestly, this is disturbing as ****. Getting mad over the 'principle' of a mother out in public with her child? Making out that doing so is somehow an attack on someone else?

This is next level obssession. People who believe this kind of thinking probably won't be happy until she's dead, and even then they'd twist it to attack her. Unhealthy behaviour.

No one cares what you think and no one is changing their opinion on what you think.
You keep saying the same old things over and over.

[Marsh.]

this seems to be a growing trend in serious debates.

This.

[arista]

Bloody hell..this is way beyond a joke now. Poor woman cannot even take her child out of the house as its another childs birthday?!

The level of obsession is a little scary tbh D:


Look Vicky
they picked LA


It is Not Scary
it is normal For Professional USA Photographers
have to make Cash
to stay alive.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Look they picked LA


It is Not Scary
it is normal USA Photographers
have to make Cash
to stay alive.

They moved to one of the most notorious places on God's earth for paparazzi

coz like they want their privacy


:laugh2:

[arista]

1385474263688392704



Good to see her Baby Archie
Happy.



Getting out of their house
good for Archie

[Tom4784]

Where has anyone got mad over the 'principle' of a mother being out with a child....???? :joker:

You should probably keep track of what you're saying, you won't trip up over yourself if you do.

No one cares what you think and no one is changing their opinion on what you think.
You keep saying the same old things over and over.

Listen, I know you care enough to be one of the first people to always respond to what I say but I don't feel the same way about you as you feel about me. I'm sure this is deeply upsetting for you, but I'm just not attracted to you like that. I'm sure you'll find someone who will love you just the same way as you love them :hug:

[jet]

What is the problem exactly ?? , she's gone outside with her child . Just look at the ridiculous fuss being made over it .

You realise I don't even care or know most of what Meghan is doing, it's usually stuff I see posted nitpicking and belittling her ever move. When the woman is just living her life.

And people say there isn't obsession & hate

YEAH right and pigs fly

What fuss? The only people making a fuss is her fans on here falsely accusing people of making a fuss. :laugh:
The level of defending Meghan is bordering on obsession. :eek:

[Marsh.]

You should probably keep track of what you're saying, you won't trip up over yourself if you do.



Listen, I know you care enough to be one of the first people to always respond to what I say but I don't feel the same way about you as you feel about me. I'm sure this is deeply upsetting for you, but I'm just not attracted to you like that. I'm sure you'll find someone who will love you just the same way as you love them :hug:

:joker:

[Jordan.]

They moved to one of the most notorious places on God's earth for paparazzi

coz like they want their privacy


:laugh2:

Seems to be working well for them? you didn't get people wetting their pants when Meghan was getting papped everyday in the UK.

edit: they probably did actually but not to this extent.

[Marsh.]

They moved to one of the most notorious places on God's earth for paparazzi

coz like they want their privacy


:laugh2:

Considering everyone's up in arms about this rare pap pic, it seems to be working very well indeed.

[DouglasS]

Hopefully I've never stooped so low as to be pissed off that somebody took their child out. I'd be bloody ashamed of myself.

Why do you want to talk about me so badly though?

You’ve actually stooped far lower... once wishing a housemate death because they evicted your favourite latesha in a game show... Honestly acting all above people is a bit silly :laugh:

[Amy Jade]

Nobody is pissed off that she took her child out....where did you get that from? Its the principle of the photo that people are debating.
If someone wants to be pissed off with a photo then they will have their reasons...I hardly see that as 'stooping so low'.....when people take the piss out of someone for personal features...thats what I call 'stooping low' :laugh:.

You say nobody is pissed off and the next sentence confirm people are missed off :laugh2:

It's so alarming that anyone is annoyed that a woman took her child out. All I'm saying!

[Amy Jade]

You’ve actually stooped far lower... once wishing a housemate death because they evicted your favourite latesha in a game show... Honestly acting all above people is a bit silly :laugh:

Here we go, getting personal again. Up Josy and James arse though so untouchable.

I may have made mistakes saying stupid stuff in the past, no question, I would have been a teenager when that happened. Shall we look at what you've done in the recent past you parasite?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Considering everyone's up in arms about this rare pap pic, it seems to be working very well indeed.

everyone isnt up in arms, that is an exaggeration writ large

[DouglasS]

Here we go, getting personal again. Up Josy and James arse though so untouchable.

I may have made mistakes saying stupid stuff in the past, no question, I would have been a teenager when that happened. Shall we look at what you've done in the recent past you parasite?

I’m not claiming to have never stopped low though, sometimes I think perspective is in order before acting high and mighty and above others. I do not think I am above you.

I also couldn’t care less about Meghan/Harry but no need to tell people how ashamed they should be/ making remarks how low forum members stoop, as it’s actually these comments that begin the derailing and personal attacks, as once you start it you shouldn’t be crying if it comes back your way :shrug:

[Parmy]

What fuss? The only people making a fuss is her fans on here falsely accusing people of making a fuss. :laugh:
The level of defending Meghan is bordering on obsession. :eek:

Very very strange.

[GoldHeart]

Who is attacking her for taking her child out in the fresh air???? :joker:

Then what exactly is the problem here

[Amy Jade]

I’m not claiming to have never stopped low though, sometimes I think perspective is in order before acting high and mighty and above others. I do not think I am above you.

I also couldn’t care less about Meghan/Harry but no need to tell people how ashamed they should be/ making remarks how low forum members stoop, as it’s actually these comments that begin the derailing and personal attacks, as once you start it you shouldn’t be crying if it comes back your way :shrug:
You're incredibly boring and predicable and clearly not here to discuss Meghan and Harry. Only a troll.

Also I never said anyone here should be ashamed. Check what I wrote, wasn't directed at anyone here, nobody seems that annoyed but back you go where you belong,the ignore list. Stalk someone else.

[Jordan.]

Then what exactly is the problem here

"Who said there was a problem?"

just getting rustygals inevitable reply in before them :fan:

[GoldHeart]

everyone isnt up in arms, that is an exaggeration writ large

And yet here we are

[GoldHeart]

"Who said there was a problem?"

just getting rustygals inevitable reply in before them :fan:

Lol
It's like pointing and hissing and tutting at something , Whilst pretending not to be doing that . I'm lost for words :rolleyes: .

[thesheriff443]

You should probably keep track of what you're saying, you won't trip up over yourself if you do.



Listen, I know you care enough to be one of the first people to always respond to what I say but I don't feel the same way about you as you feel about me. I'm sure this is deeply upsetting for you, but I'm just not attracted to you like that. I'm sure you'll find someone who will love you just the same way as you love them :hug:

That’s were you have been going wrong! I’m not into men and if I was you definitely wouldn’t make the grade.

[Jordan.]

Lol
It's like pointing and hissing and tutting at something , Whilst pretending not to be doing that . I'm lost for words :rolleyes: .

It's quite sad they can't even explain what their issue is here only they know they should dislike it because it's Meghan, the media brainwashing is real.

[Parmy]

I can explain why I dislike this flake easily.

[GoldHeart]

It's quite sad they can't even explain what their issue is here only they know they should dislike it because it's Meghan, the media brainwashing is real.

Meghan could be just sat drinking a bottle a water and still be slated for it , the media hate is real.

[Crimson Dynamo]

And yet here we are

and the only people who are up in arms is....?

:hehe:

[Marsh.]

everyone isnt up in arms, that is an exaggeration writ large

Your little twitter post linked to a thread of outrage. :shrug:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Your little twitter post linked to a thread of outrage. :shrug:

from both camps yes

but that isnt tibb its twitter

there is outrage on there on every thing from the royal family to what plants like dappled shade

[Marsh.]

from both camps yes

but that isnt tibb its twitter

there is outrage on there on every thing from the royal family to what plants like dappled shade

I never said tibb is twitter. Read what I wrote not what you think I wrote. :thumbs:

[Tom4784]

That’s were you have been going wrong! I’m not into men and if I was you definitely wouldn’t make the grade.

There, there. Rejection is a hard thing to swallow, but you'll get over it in time :love: it's better to have loved and lost than to have never loved at all.

[Cherie]

from both camps yes

but that isnt tibb its twitter

there is outrage on there on every thing from the royal family to what plants like dappled shade

They will have full shade and like it

[Crimson Dynamo]

I never said tibb is twitter. Read what I wrote not what you think I wrote. :thumbs:

no

the post was just hyperbolic and therefore had easy outs from start to finish

yaah

you found one

:skull:

[thesheriff443]

There, there. Rejection is a hard thing to swallow, but you'll get over it in time :love: it's better to have loved and lost than to have never loved before.

You must be talking about yourself .

[Crimson Dynamo]

[/B]

They will have full shade and like it

:shocked:

[Marsh.]

no

the post was just hyperbolic and therefore had easy outs from start to finish

yaah

you found one

:skull:

More babble. You can't just stick to a point can you?

Conversation is not for you.

[rusticgal]

You say nobody is pissed off and the next sentence confirm people are missed off :laugh2:

It's so alarming that anyone is annoyed that a woman took her child out. All I'm saying!


I said IF they want to be pissed off...:laugh:

It’s not about people being pissed off about taking her child out...it’s about being photographed taking her child out when she sued someone for doing the very thing a year ago.
Hopefully she will sue them too for invasion of privacy....unless of course it was deliberately staged...

[thesheriff443]

I said IF they want to be pissed off...:laugh:

It’s not about people being pissed off about taking her child out...it’s about being photographed taking her child out when she sued someone for doing the very thing a year ago.
Hopefully she will sue them too for invasion of privacy....unless of course it was deliberately staged...

I will put out there now, it won’t be long before they have a film crew following them around.

[Crimson Dynamo]

1385168073741717505

[Marsh.]

The irony given all the grief he's caused throughout his mother's reign. :joker:

[thesheriff443]

The irony given all the grief he's caused throughout his mother's reign. :joker:

He had an an affair just like his former wife and got divorced.
So no he hasn’t caused his mother lots of grief.
And you could see he was deeply hurt at the loss of his father which only made me respect him more.

[user104658]

He had an an affair just like his former wife and got divorced.
So no he hasn’t caused his mother lots of grief.
And you could see he was deeply hurt at the loss of his father which only made me respect him more.

He gained your respect because ... ... he was upset at the death of one of his parents? Wow that's a mighty low bar there Sheriff :joker:.

[Amy Jade]

The irony given all the grief he's caused throughout his mother's reign. :joker:

Exactly!

The way Diana was treated made people loath them and they still haven't fully recovered.

[GoldHeart]

He had an an affair just like his former wife and got divorced.
So no he hasn’t caused his mother lots of grief.
And you could see he was deeply hurt at the loss of his father which only made me respect him more.

Charles was the one who cheated first with Camilla, so stop making out Diana was unfaithful .

Charles used Diana ,he just wanted children he never genuinely loved her .

It's laughable to put ' respect ' in it , whilst ignoring the problems he's caused through the years.

I guess when you're white and old like Andrew & Charles then you get tons of passes .

[user104658]

1385168073741717505

Wonder if this is true? What an awful dad if so, no wonder Harry would want to leave.

That said, I suspect it's a load of sh*te like most of the other "Royal Leakz".

[Glenn.]

Wonder if this is true? What an awful dad if so, no wonder Harry would want to leave.

That said, I suspect it's a load of sh*te like most of the other "Royal Leakz".

If true then it’s despicable on Charles part.

[thesheriff443]

Charles was the one who cheated first with Camilla, so stop making out Diana was unfaithful .

Charles used Diana ,he just wanted children he never genuinely loved her .

It's laughable to put ' respect ' in it , whilst ignoring the problems he's caused through the years.

I guess when you're white and old like Andrew & Charles then you get tons of passes .

Look at you thinking you know every detail you know as much as anyone else
She was still married to Charles and was shagging so yea she was just as bad

[bots]

it may not be true, but lets not kid ourselves, charles is a complete **** and it wouldn't be out of character. I keep saying it, but none of these royals are nice people, i don't understand for the life of me why people are so invested in them

[thesheriff443]

If true then it’s despicable on Charles part.

It’s not a man on his seventies is probably sick of his 34 year old son and his attention seeking wife causing drama.

[Glenn.]

It’s not a man on his seventies is probably sick of his 34 year old son and his attention seeking wife causing drama.

So despicable then

[GoldHeart]

Look at you thinking you know every detail you know as much as anyone else
She was still married to Charles and was shagging so yea she was just as bad

Charles and Camilla rubbed it in Diana's face even on her wedding day , plus Diana had second thoughts about marrying Charles but she was pressured.

She was a young woman thrown in the deep end and felt like she couldn't back out , when she told the world that 3 people were in the marriage ,I'm pretty sure we all knew it was finished .

Charles had been cheating for a long time, so stop acting like you're an expert. The marriage was already over by the time Diana had other relationships.

[Marsh.]

He had an an affair just like his former wife and got divorced.
So no he hasn’t caused his mother lots of grief.

Yes, he has caused his mother a TREMENDOUS amount of grief in her time on the throne.


And you could see he was deeply hurt at the loss of his father which only made me respect him more.

Couldn't care less who you do or don't respect.
Being sad over your dad dying is a normal human emotion, not something noble.

[Marsh.]

Look at you thinking you know every detail you know as much as anyone else



She was still married to Charles and was shagging so yea she was just as bad

Look at you thinking you know every detail, you know as much as anyone else.

[Crimson Dynamo]

i bet most of the royal household are glad

[Amy Jade]

man good. woman bad.

[jet]

i bet most of the royal household are glad

Those that worked for Meghan certainly will be very glad, they have been given posts with other royals apparently, where they aren't getting bullied anymore.

[AnnieK]

Those that worked for Meghan certainly will be very glad, they have been given posts with other royals apparently, where they aren't getting bullied anymore.

I didn't realise the bullying allegations had been verified. I haven't heard of anyone losing their jobs over ignoring the allegations from people being bullied. Maybe that will be in tomorrows papers??

[thesheriff443]

Look at you thinking you know every detail, you know as much as anyone else.

Exactly mash

[Crimson Dynamo]

Those that worked for Meghan certainly will be very glad, they have been given posts with other royals apparently, where they aren't getting bullied anymore.

Many resigned, with great financial hardship :(

[jet]

I didn't realise the bullying allegations had been verified. I haven't heard of anyone losing their jobs over ignoring the allegations from people being bullied. Maybe that will be in tomorrows papers??

Meghan's allegations of her mental health issues being ignored and of racism in the royal family haven't been verified either, but are taken as gospel by some. :shrug:
Do you believe her?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Meghan's allegations of her mental health issues being ignored and of racism in the royal family haven't been verified either, but are taken as gospel by some. :shrug:
Do you believe her?

But Jet

That's "her truth",....

🧐

[Marsh.]

Meghan's allegations of her mental health issues being ignored and of racism in the royal family haven't been verified either, but are taken as gospel by some. :shrug:
Do you believe her?

Someone's own experiences with their own mind versus unproven accusations against someone else. Hmmm.

The first one isn't for anyone to prove one way or the other, it's her mind, it's not for you or anyone else to "believe". The second is an accusation that requires evidence, hence requiring an investigation.

[Glenn.]

Imagine being this vile with someone’s mental health. Why is this **** allowed to be posted on this site

[rusticgal]

But Jet

That's "her truth",....

🧐


....and ‘her truth’ has been proved to be untrue.

[user104658]

....and ‘her truth’ has been proved to be untrue.


Oh? When and where?

[thesheriff443]

Imagine being this vile with someone’s mental health. Why is this **** allowed to be posted on this site

Stop trying to shut people’s opinions down
It’s simple I’m one of hundreds of thousands if not millions who don’t believe Meghan on her mental health statement

She seems to have made a full recovery!
Did she say on Oprah she was still receiving help?

[thesheriff443]

If some jobs worth at the palace told you it wouldn’t look good to get help for being suicidal
Would you just accept it and go ok sorry for asking?

Utter bollox and an insult to those who are suffering from mental health issues.

Harry can go to a war zone but can fight for his wife, it’s an insult to people’s intelligence

[Amy Jade]

Disbelieving someone about their mental health is disgusting though. You can't know how she felt in that moment and the months since.

I work with people with mental health problems who you'd look at and think are fine but underneath the welcoming smile they give us as we walk in they are fighting so hard and it's sadpeople are so ignorant about it.

[Glenn.]

Stop trying to shut people’s opinions down
It’s simple I’m one of hundreds of thousands if not millions who don’t believe Meghan on her mental health statement

She seems to have made a full recovery!
Did she say on Oprah she was still receiving help?

I’ll shut down whatever I want when the **** you post is damaging like it is. Saying you and millions (a tad over dramatic I might add) don’t believe her doesn’t make what you’re saying any less ignorant and disgusting.

[LukeB]

Disbelieving someone about their mental health is disgusting though. You can't know how she felt in that moment and the months since.

I work with people with mental health problems who you'd look at and think are fine but underneath the welcoming smile they give us as we walk in is a mask for a battle they are fighting every single day.

You’re absolutely right. Mental health is something you can’t see sometimes like if someone is acting fine, smiling and not thinking dark thoughts they haven’t made a ‘full recovery’ they are just having good days but still are suffering. You’re not sad and depressed 24/7 you have good days and bad days. Caroline Flack died last year who was fascinated about suicide most her life and we never had a clue she was suffering because she looked fine when on TV so it proves you can never know how someone felt that day or how they are feeling.

It’s so insulting and dangerous to be that ignorant about mental health and say someone is lying about it because they don’t like her. Absolutely vile

[rusticgal]

Do you all believe her when she said she COULD'NT get help...?? Bearing in mind her husband is associated with Mental Health groups...

[jet]

I said upthread:
"Meghan's allegations of her mental health issues being ignored...have not been verified either".

That is not the same as saying she didn't have any mental health problems. Honestly, the level of reading comprehension by some is dire.

[thesheriff443]

I’ll shut down whatever I want when the **** you post is damaging like it is. Saying you and millions (a tad over dramatic I might add) don’t believe her doesn’t make what you’re saying any less ignorant and disgusting.

Watch your mouth!
You shut nothing down

[Liam-]

Do you all believe her when she said she COULD'NT get help...?? Bearing in mind her husband is associated with Mental Health groups...

I completely believe that she was probably strongly advised against it because the firm wouldn’t want the news to get out that one of their own was mentally struggling with the pressure, because it would harm their image

[Amy Jade]

I completely believe that she was probably strongly advised against it because the firm wouldn’t want the news to get out that one of their own was mentally struggling with the pressure, because it would harm their image

I 100% agree with this.

[Glenn.]

Watch your mouth!
You shut nothing down

I’ll call out your ignorance as long as you keeping being ignorant :thumbs:

[Crimson Dynamo]

I completely believe that she was probably strongly advised against it because the firm wouldn’t want the news to get out that one of their own was mentally struggling with the pressure, because it would harm their image

why did she not say that then to oprah?

are you saying she told lies to protect the RF?

[jet]

I completely believe that she was probably strongly advised against it because the firm wouldn’t want the news to get out that one of their own was mentally struggling with the pressure, because it would harm their image

William and Harry have both spoken out in the past about receiving mental health care for their problems from the Palaces own private MH specialists they can call on.
Nobody knew this until they chose to talk about it in their roles/ involvement with mental health organizations. Charles has also spoken about receiving help.
If 2 future Kings can admit to it, I don't see how they are worried about it harming their image. It would be seen as a good thing that a newcomer was getting all the help they could provide which she was in many ways.
I don't believe she was refused help at all.

[rusticgal]

I completely believe that she was probably strongly advised against it because the firm wouldn’t want the news to get out that one of their own was mentally struggling with the pressure, because it would harm their image


Harry has spoken about his own Mental health issues since his mother died..he has even spoken about the fact that he sought help (which makes it all the more unrealistic that she couldnt get any)...he has spoken about it more than once.
So why would the Firm be embarrassed when one of their own has admitted to it???
It doesnt make sense.

[jet]

Harry has spoken about his own Mental health issues since his mother died..he has even spoken about the fact that he sought help (which makes it all the more unrealistic that she couldnt get any)...he has spoken about it more than once.
So why would the Firm be embarrassed when one of their own has admitted to it???
It doesnt make sense.

Yeah, it doesn't make sense at all and its not like she didn't tell other lies in the interview as well....

[rusticgal]

Oprah would know that Harry is associated with Mental Health groups....but failed to question it. The more you think about the interview the more of a joke it was...

[rusticgal]

Yeah, it doesn't make sense at all and its not like she didn't tell other lies in the interview as well....


..yup...like LT said 'her Truths' :hee:

:wavey:

[jet]

Oprah would know that Harry is associated with Mental Health groups....but failed to question it. The more you think about the interview the more of a joke it was...

It couldn't be called an 'interview'. It was a showcase for Meghan and Harry to tell people what they wanted them to believe, and how hard done by they were, with absolutely not one thing being their fault. Some fell for it, most didn't.

I'm hearing that Harry regrets it and didn't know Meghan was going to claim some of the things she did - and they argued about it afterwards, that hasn't been verified, but it sounds feasible enough. :hee:

[Alf]

Is this lying cow still in the news?

What's Pinocchio done now?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Oprah would know that Harry is associated with Mental Health groups....but failed to question it. The more you think about the interview the more of a joke it was...

it was a staged pr exercise only

[Glenn.]

Is this lying cow still in the news?

What's Pinocchio done now?

I mean you pretty much have to search for news articles about her unless you religiously read the Daily Mail.

[rusticgal]

It couldn't be called an 'interview'. It was a showcase for Meghan and Harry to tell people what they wanted them to believe, and how hard done by they were, with absolutely not one thing being their fault. Some fell for it, most didn't.

I'm hearing that Harry regrets it and didn't know Meghan was going to claim some of the things she did - and they argued about it afterwards, that hasn't been verified, but it sounds feasible enough. :hee:


Well if that was the case then more fool Harry for not talking it over with Meghan before hand....if your wife is going to talk about her time spent with your family surely you would want to know exactly what they were planning to say....
I dare say he does regret it...he will be remembered for moaning about being cut of financially at the age of 36 whilst living in a 14 million pound house :laugh:

[rusticgal]

Is this lying cow still in the news?

What's Pinocchio done now?


Well you wont believe it but she was papped out walking with Arhie....and wait for it...she hasnt sued them yet :laugh:

[Glenn.]

Well you wont believe it but she was papped out walking with Arhie....and wait for it...she hasnt sued them yet :laugh:

Was it her fault she was papped or something?

[rusticgal]

Was it her fault she was papped or something?


Well if she doesnt sue them....then it must have been :hee:

[jet]

Well if that was the case then more fool Harry for not talking it over with Meghan before hand....if your wife is going to talk about her time spent with your family surely you would want to know exactly what they were planning to say....
I dare say he does regret it...he will be remembered for moaning about being cut of financially at the age of 36 whilst living in a 14 million pound house :laugh:

Yes, with their differernt accounts of when the racist remarks were supposed to have been made they didn't seem to make sure their stories tallied...and Meghan apparently said stuff he didn't know she was going to. Too bad Harry, you shouldn't trust her. :laugh:
Harry sure was seething at Daddy not letting him be 'financially independent', which remember he said they wanted to be haha when they left their duties behind.

[Niamh.]

IF MEGHAN DOESN'T WANT PUBLICITY SHE SHOULD STOP LEAVING HER HOUSE aaaarrrggghhhh etc

[bots]

Meghan's big mistake was leaving suits

[Glenn.]

Meghan's big mistake was leaving suits

The show did kinda fall apart with her

[Crimson Dynamo]

IF MEGHAN DOESN'T WANT PUBLICITY SHE SHOULD STOP LEAVING HER HOUSE aaaarrrggghhhh etc

it would help not living in the place on earth with more paps than anywhere else

:whistle:

[rusticgal]

The show did kinda fall apart with her


Oh...wasn't she very good in that either?

[Crimson Dynamo]

'STOP OPPRESSING THEM!' Donald Trump Jr mocks Meghan and Prince Harry’s
$25million Spotify contract as musicians fume over megadeal

https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/04/NINTCHDBPICT000488440686.jpg?w=620

DONALD Trump Jr has mercilessly mocked Meghan and Harry’s $25M podcast
deal with Spotify, as musicians fume over the lucrative agreement.

Sharing a New York Post article with the headline ‘Harry and Meghan’s $25M
Spotify deal a ‘kick in the teeth’ to musicians’, the ex-president’s son tweeted
“Stop oppressing them!!!!”

The jibe was in relation to the recent news that musicians are unimpressed
with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s lucrative deal with Spotify.

The pair are producing feel-good podcasts for the platform, which has been
criticized for its payment model for artists, many of whom are being paid
less than a penny per stream when their songs are played online.

Famed musicians including Paul McCartney, Chris Martin, Kate Bush, Stevie
Nicks and 150 others called upon the UK government this week to overhaul
the way streaming platforms pay musicians.

Many artists were up in arms about Spotify boss Horacio Gutierrez telling
Parliament that Harry and Meghan’s deal would create a “virtuous cycle” that
would help to get more people on the site.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/us-news/14771465/donald-trump-jr-mocks-meghan-prince-harry-spotify/

[jet]

Well you wont believe it but she was papped out walking with Arhie....and wait for it...she hasnt sued them yet :laugh:

What gets me is that she releases something every time one of the royals has a important event or birthday or wedding anniversary or whatever. Then out comes an annoucement or a new photo on the very same day, over and over again. This time it was a picture of Louis on his birthday - and she is pictured with Archie. It's really weird. :umm2:

[Crimson Dynamo]

DAN WOOTTON: Kate may have forgiven Harry but will William ever forgive Meghan? My sources doubt it


Level of bitterness and rancour between Prince William and Meghan Markle has been underplayed
Duke of Cambridge had been angry about the behaviour of his sister-in-law for well over a year
That was before Meghan sat down with Oprah Winfrey to attack his wife Kate Middleton
Those close to William believe he will struggle to ever forgive Meghan for damage she has unleashed


https://ontheradio.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Dan-Wootton.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9516349/DAN-WOOTTON-Kate-Middleton-forgiven-Harry-William-forgive-Meghan-Markle.html?ito=windows-widget-push-notification&ci=143073

[Cherie]

Oh...wasn't she very good in that either?

:laugh:

[Niamh.]

'STOP OPPRESSING THEM!' Donald Trump Jr mocks Meghan and Prince Harry’s
$25million Spotify contract as musicians fume over megadeal

https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/04/NINTCHDBPICT000488440686.jpg?w=620

DONALD Trump Jr has mercilessly mocked Meghan and Harry’s $25M podcast
deal with Spotify, as musicians fume over the lucrative agreement.

Sharing a New York Post article with the headline ‘Harry and Meghan’s $25M
Spotify deal a ‘kick in the teeth’ to musicians’, the ex-president’s son tweeted
“Stop oppressing them!!!!”

The jibe was in relation to the recent news that musicians are unimpressed
with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s lucrative deal with Spotify.

The pair are producing feel-good podcasts for the platform, which has been
criticized for its payment model for artists, many of whom are being paid
less than a penny per stream when their songs are played online.

Famed musicians including Paul McCartney, Chris Martin, Kate Bush, Stevie
Nicks and 150 others called upon the UK government this week to overhaul
the way streaming platforms pay musicians.

Many artists were up in arms about Spotify boss Horacio Gutierrez telling
Parliament that Harry and Meghan’s deal would create a “virtuous cycle” that
would help to get more people on the site.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/us-news/14771465/donald-trump-jr-mocks-meghan-prince-harry-spotify/

Doesn't he have a Tiger to shoot or something? :idc:

[Glenn.]

What gets me is that she releases something every time one of the royals has a important event or birthday or wedding anniversary or whatever. Then out comes an annoucement or a new photo on the very same day, over and over again. This time it was a picture of Louis on his birthday - and she is pictured with Archie. It's really weird. :umm2:

You’re actually suggesting that Meghan released the picture of her and her son, that a pap took and sold to the media? Does your hatred for her actually have a level or are you in competition with yourself to see how irrational you can get?

[jet]

'STOP OPPRESSING THEM!' Donald Trump Jr mocks Meghan and Prince Harry’s
$25million Spotify contract as musicians fume over megadeal

https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/04/NINTCHDBPICT000488440686.jpg?w=620

DONALD Trump Jr has mercilessly mocked Meghan and Harry’s $25M podcast
deal with Spotify, as musicians fume over the lucrative agreement.

Sharing a New York Post article with the headline ‘Harry and Meghan’s $25M
Spotify deal a ‘kick in the teeth’ to musicians’, the ex-president’s son tweeted
“Stop oppressing them!!!!”

The jibe was in relation to the recent news that musicians are unimpressed
with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s lucrative deal with Spotify.

The pair are producing feel-good podcasts for the platform, which has been
criticized for its payment model for artists, many of whom are being paid
less than a penny per stream when their songs are played online.

Famed musicians including Paul McCartney, Chris Martin, Kate Bush, Stevie
Nicks and 150 others called upon the UK government this week to overhaul
the way streaming platforms pay musicians.

Many artists were up in arms about Spotify boss Horacio Gutierrez telling
Parliament that Harry and Meghan’s deal would create a “virtuous cycle” that
would help to get more people on the site.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/us-news/14771465/donald-trump-jr-mocks-meghan-prince-harry-spotify/

"A virtuous cycle"? :joker:

[Parmy]

You’re actually suggesting that Meghan released the picture of her and her son, that a pap took and sold to the media? Does your hatred for her actually have a level or are you in competition with yourself to see how irrational you can get?

She probably set it up...only a fool would believe otherwise.

[Marsh.]

Stop trying to shut people’s opinions down
It’s simple I’m one of hundreds of thousands if not millions who don’t believe Meghan on her mental health statement

She seems to have made a full recovery!
Did she say on Oprah she was still receiving help?

More mental health ignorance from you. Same old.

[Marsh.]

IF MEGHAN DOESN'T WANT PUBLICITY SHE SHOULD STOP LEAVING HER HOUSE aaaarrrggghhhh etc

:joker:

[Marsh.]

it would help not living in the place on earth with more paps than anywhere else

:whistle:

Yet she rarely gets papped compared to when she lived in England. Funny that.

[Marsh.]

God imagine reading Dan Wootton material. :facepalm: :joker:

[Glenn.]

She probably set it up...only a fool would believe otherwise.

Ok parm.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Meghan Markle "fans" outraged at 'torrent of abuse' over claim
Archie snap 'upstaged' Louis

MEGHAN MARKLE's fans have gathered around the Duchess of Sussex after a
paparazzi shot of herself and Archie was released hours before Prince Louis's birthday.

Fans and supporters of Meghan and Prince Harry took to Twitter to protect the
Sussexes from online attacks in the wake of the publication of a snap with her
child. The timing of this picture's publication sparked criticism by some social
media users, who accused the Duchess of trying to overshadow Prince Louis's
birthday.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1427035/meghan-markle-news-picture-archie-harrison-paparazzi-prince-louis-birthday-snap

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01/21/02/23653724-0-Meghan_Markle_took_son_Archie_for_a_walk_in_the_wo ods_Monday_mor-a-153_1579572007541.jpg

Top Comment: No pictures of the madam are taken without her knowledge beforehand...

[Marsh.]

LT: They live in the place with the most paps in the world.

Also LT: Meghan has complete control over each and every pap shot taken.

So, they got what they wanted then? Complete control of their own privacy? You can't have it both ways love, claiming they lied about wanting privacy so went to pap capital where they won't get it but then also claim she has control over pap pics taken, which suggests they do have it. :idc:

[Niamh.]

You can't even see him hardly in that picture anyway fgs :laugh:

[jet]

She probably set it up...only a fool would believe otherwise.

Of course its set up. The paps are waiting for anyone famous to appear in that neighbourhood, which is chock full of celebs, and she knows this. Funny how she just happened to be papped to coincide exactly with Louis's birthday.

She was never papped in England on a private outing that I can recall at all, the only time she was photographed was on official duties when the press were invited.

[Marsh.]

You can't even see him hardly in that picture anyway fgs :laugh:

Excuse me Niamh those are quite clearly PRINCELY legs poking out in that picture!!! She knew exactly which body parts to put on show. And that green beanie??? Obviously mocking William's bald head. :idc:

[Niamh.]

Excuse me Niamh those are quite clearly PRINCELY legs poking out in that picture!!! She knew exactly which body parts to out on show. And that green beanie??? Obviously mocking William's bald head. :idc:

:laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

No wonder William is blazing

[Cherie]

Excuse me Niamh those are quite clearly PRINCELY legs poking out in that picture!!! She knew exactly which body parts to out on show. And that green beanie??? Obviously mocking William's bald head. :idc:

Thats not the pic, Archie is almost 2 :laugh:

[Marsh.]

The paps are waiting for anyone famous to appear in that neighbourhood, which is chock full of celebs, and she knows this.

Meghan should keep her and her child inside the house to avoid being photographed walking. Everyone knows walking on someone else's birthday is abhorrent and to be PHOTOGRAPHED walking well, it's tantamount to abuse.

[Marsh.]

Thats not the pic, Archie is almost 2 :laugh:

I know sweetie. It's called a joke.

[Cherie]

1385473981461979137

I think half the forum has dementia :omgno:

[Cherie]

I know sweetie. It's called a joke.

Oh you are usually ranting so how was I to know :laugh:

[Marsh.]

Oh you are usually ranting so how was I to know :laugh:

By learning how to read I guess?

[Niamh.]

Thats not the pic, Archie is almost 2 :laugh:

See, I'm not a "sugar" :p

[Marsh.]

See, I'm not a "sugar" :p

Not sweet enough, I guess. :hehe:

[Niamh.]

he's very cute though :love:

[Niamh.]

I think half the forum has dementia :omgno:

I didn't see that post actually, I avoid this thread as much as possible, just dared to stick my head in a little while ago due to reports :skull:

[jet]

Well you wont believe it but she was papped out walking with Arhie....and wait for it...she hasnt sued them yet :laugh:

She made a big scene about the last time she was papped out walking with Archie, that was ages ago when they were living in Canada. She hasn't been papped with him since, but now it just happens to be the time of Louis's birthday...:whistle: Lets see if she sues this time. :wink:

[LukeB]

1385558711914086401

[Cherie]

See, I'm not a "sugar" :p

obviously not :laugh:

[Glenn.]

1385558711914086401

‘Meghan releases this’

They can’t even see they’re own stupidity

[Tom4784]

Not believing someone's mental health struggles just because you don't like them is pretty ****ing despicable.

[Crimson Dynamo]

you can see her smirking in the pics

:idc:

[jet]

1385473981461979137

Those daft shoes! No support at all. Her feet are hanging out of them, she could take a tumble while pregnant and carrying a child. :nono:

[Amy Jade]

you can see her smirking in the pics

:idc:

What a cow smiling at her child eh?

[jet]

Not believing someone's mental health struggles just because you don't like them is pretty ****ing despicable.

More reading comprehension problems. :rolleyes:

[Crimson Dynamo]

1387023713250447360

[Tom4784]

More reading comprehension problems. :rolleyes:

No, I surmised things pretty well. The whole argument is that people are doubting her struggles because of the idea that they don't think she couldn't have gotten help while ignoring the fact that this happened to Diana and it seems like not much has changed since then.

Don't pass off your latest failure as others having reading comprehension issues. It's utterly hypocritical considering how often you miss the point. Stop with the projecting.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's ratings drop AGAIN to lowest ever levels
after Prince Philip's funeral - but Charles and Edward enjoy popularity boost as
Queen remains Britain's favourite Royal


Popularity of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex fallen again following Prince Philip's funeral earlier in April
Previously saw sharp decline in public opinion after their bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey last month
Queen remains most popular royal while Prince Edward and Prince Charles both saw a boost in popularity


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/04/27/14/42276450-9516595-image-a-2_1619529235764.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9516595/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markles-ratings-drop-lowest-levels.html?ito=windows-widget-push-notification&ci=143247

[Niamh.]

She made a big scene about the last time she was papped out walking with Archie, that was ages ago when they were living in Canada. She hasn't been papped with him since, but now it just happens to be the time of Louis's birthday...:whistle: Lets see if she sues this time. :wink:

maybe they were off to buy him a present :smug:

[Niamh.]

Those daft shoes! No support at all. Her feet are hanging out of them, she could take a tumble while pregnant and carrying a child. :nono:

https://media1.giphy.com/media/agv8yrwbXC7u/giphy.gif

[Crimson Dynamo]

1385392397920587785

[jet]

No, I surmised things pretty well. The whole argument is that people are doubting her struggles because of the idea that they don't think she couldn't have gotten help while ignoring the fact that this happened to Diana and it seems like not much has changed since then.

Don't pass off your latest failure as others having reading comprehension issues. It's utterly hypocritical considering how often you miss the point. Stop with the projecting.

Considering how your every argument, no matter what it is, consists of "I'm right and you're wrong" I've learned to stop responding at this point.
Your next move is "You have no argument against what I'm saying, so you've backed out". I can read you like a tedious book. :smug:

[jet]

https://media1.giphy.com/media/agv8yrwbXC7u/giphy.gif

Oops! :laugh:

[Tom4784]

Considering how your every argument, no matter what it is, consists of "I'm right and you're wrong" I've learned to stop responding at this point.
Your next move is "You have no argument against what I'm saying, so you've backed out". I can read you like a tedious book. :smug:

Just like how you always throw out insults after you get your ass handed to you because you lack maturity.

The reason why I'm right and I always win our little arguments is because I'm competent and I actually put effort into not only my own argument, but I also think of arguments against your inevitable attempts at repeating my words back at me (sans the correct context, because we both know you constantly need to be reminded of what context is).

Instead of throwing a tantrum every time I prove you wrong, you should try learning from your failures, because throwing a tantrum over someone being right is just peak childishness.

[Tom4784]

Also you say you've learned to 'stop responding' but you're often quick to respond to me at every opportunity... What have you 'learned' exactly?

[Glenn.]

Considering how your every argument, no matter what it is, consists of "I'm right and you're wrong" I've learned to stop responding at this point.
Your next move is "You have no argument against what I'm saying, so you've backed out". I can read you like a tedious book. :smug:

That’s because every conversation in these threads goes in circles. You irrationally hate on a woman you don’t know, people try and figure out why. You can’t ever give a rational response to people who quite rightly call you out on it so you back out until the next daily Mail article is posted then we repeat the cycle again.

[jet]

1385392397920587785

It does. Ouch. D:
I still can't get over those stupid shoes. :nono: Imagine me worrying that Megsie could fall. :eek:

[jet]

Also you say you've learned to 'stop responding' but you're often quick to respond to me at every opportunity... What have you 'learned' exactly?

I do for a bit, just to see if you ever admit you're wrong. No luck so far. :hehe:

[jet]

Just like how you always throw out insults after you get your ass handed to you because you lack maturity.

The reason why I'm right and I always win our little arguments is because I'm competent and I actually put effort into not only my own argument, but I also think of arguments against your inevitable attempts at repeating my words back at me (sans the correct context, because we both know you constantly need to be reminded of what context is).

Instead of throwing a tantrum every time I prove you wrong, you should try learning from your failures, because throwing a tantrum over someone being right is just peak childishness.

You're hilarious. Really. :joker:

[jet]

maybe they were off to buy him a present :smug:

Or a pair of decent walking shoes. :hehe:

[Tom4784]

I do for a bit, just to see if you ever admit you're wrong. No luck so far. :hehe:

Prove me wrong, you keep expecting me to say i'm wrong because you want me to be wrong, and that's not how this works. I'm always right because I can always argue against what you say, you just throw tantrums and and act like I should declare myself wrong because you demand it. Spoiled, childish attitude.

You accused me of bad reading comprehension, I say otherwise by explaining my point. You scream that I'm always right and attack me for it instead of addressing the issue in the room, if I'm always right, that means you're always doing something wrong.

I never have to scream about people being right or wrong because I let my arguments do the talking.

[Tom4784]

You're hilarious. Really. :joker:

And you need to grow up.

[jet]

And you need to grow up.

And you need to admit you are wrong when you are. (And stop throwing insults around.)

[Glenn.]

And you need to admit you are wrong when you are.

Tell the group why he’s wrong then

[rusticgal]

Tell the group why he’s wrong then


He doesnt have to....we can read it for ourselves.

Nobody has to be right OR wrong its debate and opinion.

[jet]

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's ratings drop AGAIN to lowest ever levels
after Prince Philip's funeral - but Charles and Edward enjoy popularity boost as
Queen remains Britain's favourite Royal


Popularity of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex fallen again following Prince Philip's funeral earlier in April
Previously saw sharp decline in public opinion after their bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey last month
Queen remains most popular royal while Prince Edward and Prince Charles both saw a boost in popularity


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/04/27/14/42276450-9516595-image-a-2_1619529235764.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9516595/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markles-ratings-drop-lowest-levels.html?ito=windows-widget-push-notification&ci=143247

These are the most popular royals (rated very positive or positive) according to a YouGov poll of 1,730 Britons between April 21 and 22:

The Queen: 85 per cent (net: +78)

Prince William: 80 per cent (net: +68)

Kate Middleton: 78 per cent (net: +67)

Princess Anne: 70 per cent (net: +58)

Prince Charles: 58 per cent (net: +25)

Prince Edward: 54 per cent (net: +35)

Prince Harry: 43 per cent (net: -6)

Camilla Parker Bowles: 43 per cent (net: +1)

Meghan Markle: 29 per cent (net: -32)

Prince Andrew: 10 per cent (net: -69)

To think that Harry used to be often second after the Queen, now he's on a par with Camilla, and Megs is only more popular than Andrew. :hehe:

[Glenn.]

He doesnt have to....we can read it for ourselves.

Nobody has to be right OR wrong its debate and opinion.

If he’s telling someone they’re wrong he needs to explain why.

[Cherie]

These are the most popular royals (rated very positive or positive) according to a YouGov poll of 1,730 Britons between April 21 and 22:

The Queen: 85 per cent (net: +78)

Prince William: 80 per cent (net: +68)

Kate Middleton: 78 per cent (net: +67)

Princess Anne: 70 per cent (net: +58)

Prince Charles: 58 per cent (net: +25)

Prince Edward: 54 per cent (net: +35)

Prince Harry: 43 per cent (net: -6)

Camilla Parker Bowles: 43 per cent (net: +1)

Meghan Markle: 29 per cent (net: -32)

Prince Andrew: 10 per cent (net: -69)

To think that Harry used to be often second after the Queen, now he's on a par with Camilla, and Megs is only more popular than Andrew. :hehe:

Crikey

[Crimson Dynamo]

These are the most popular royals (rated very positive or positive) according to a YouGov poll of 1,730 Britons between April 21 and 22:

The Queen: 85 per cent (net: +78)

Prince William: 80 per cent (net: +68)

Kate Middleton: 78 per cent (net: +67)

Princess Anne: 70 per cent (net: +58)

Prince Charles: 58 per cent (net: +25)

Prince Edward: 54 per cent (net: +35)

Prince Harry: 43 per cent (net: -6)

Camilla Parker Bowles: 43 per cent (net: +1)

Meghan Markle: 29 per cent (net: -32)

Prince Andrew: 10 per cent (net: -69)

To think that Harry used to be often second after the Queen, now he's on a par with Camilla, and Megs is only more popular than Andrew. :hehe:

Markle at -32

well well

looks like the GBP are at odds with many in this thread....

[jet]

He doesnt have to....we can read it for ourselves.

Nobody has to be right OR wrong its debate and opinion.

Yep, all Dezzy has to do is re - read my post about Meghan's mental health issues and see he was wrong. It's simple enough.

[rusticgal]

If he’s telling someone they’re wrong he needs to explain why.


Really?....Why should he have to keep repeating himself.
I questioned 4 people on their false allegations the other day and they never came back to me :shrug: (and I think one of them might have been you) :laugh:

[Parmy]

Hes a handsome wee chap mind.

[rusticgal]

Markle at -32

well well

looks like the GBP are at odds with many in this thread....


Oh dear....thats not looking good for Megs.

[Parmy]

Really?....Why should he have to keep repeating himself.
I questioned 4 people on their false allegations the other day and they never came back to me :shrug: (and I think one of them might have been you) :laugh:

He probably reported it hoping it would be taken away.

[Cherie]

He probably reported it hoping it would be taken away.

:laugh:

yes some people can disappear or just ignore stuff posted while others are harangued to respond and even then the person waiting for the response pretends not to understand what it being said...its very TiBB

[Glenn.]

Markle at -32

well well

looks like the GBP are at odds with many in this thread....

1750 people LT

Hardly the GBP

[Glenn.]

Really?....Why should he have to keep repeating himself.
I questioned 4 people on their false allegations the other day and they never came back to me :shrug: (and I think one of them might have been you) :laugh:

What false allegations. I don’t know what you’re talking about :umm2:

[rusticgal]

What false allegations. I don’t know what you’re talking about :umm2:

Page 31

[Glenn.]

Who said a mother cant go out with her child???? :joker:

I’m assuming you mean this one?

We’ve literally spent 7 pages discussing Meghan being papped whilst walking out with her child. Some have hilariously accused her of deliberately being papped to upstage another child on his birthday.

It’s completely insane.

I’m guessing that is the post you desperately needed answering. I could only find more absurd posts from you on that page.

[Parmy]

I’m assuming you mean this one?

We’ve literally spent 7 pages discussing Meghan being papped whilst walking out with her child. Some have hilariously accused her of deliberately being papped to upstage another child on his birthday.

It’s completely insane.

I’m guessing that is the post you desperately needed answering. I could only find more absurd posts from you on that page.




You waited 7 pages to get that answer..because you couldnt give that answer on page 31.:smug:

[Marsh.]

you can see her smirking in the pics

:idc:

1. Don't leave the house

2. Don't let your child out of the house

3. Don't smile

Anything else?

[Marsh.]

those daft shoes! No support at all. Her feet are hanging out of them, she could take a tumble while pregnant and carrying a child. :nono:

omg!!! How dare she invent slip-on shoes!!!!

[Marsh.]

1387023713250447360

Royal and celebrity are one and the same at this point.

[Kazanne]

Well as an onlooker who doesn't really care, even I can see that they craved for privacy but seem very much to be courting it in one way or another, the debate is more about that and the interview than 'hating' anyone, I suppose some people expected them to move away and be private as they did state they wanted,

[Amy Jade]

i have no opinion whatsoever on Meghan


i do like Harry though, but only more because of him being inspiration via invictus games etc

He did a wonderful job bringing attention to the invictus games didn't he Nicky

[GoldHeart]

LT: They live in the place with the most paps in the world.

Also LT: Meghan has complete control over each and every pap shot taken.

So, they got what they wanted then? Complete control of their own privacy? You can't have it both ways love, claiming they lied about wanting privacy so went to pap capital where they won't get it but then also claim she has control over pap pics taken, which suggests they do have it. :idc:

Ikr talk about contradiction :facepalm: , just maybe she didn't know paps were taking her photo while she's out with her son .

But no as usual the narrative is 'evil Meghan planned it all ahaaa' .