FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
'Two things have been clear for years: a) Katie Hopkins has cleverly built a popular, personal brand on provocative views that tend to to demonise people she doesn’t like, and get a rise out of people who don’t like her; b) the best way to respond is not to respond at all.
That’s fine - Hopkins has children to feed and dress - and we can unfollow her, and avoid what she writes and says. Free country, free speech. Just look the other way. But when a national newspaper, which gives this brand an audience of two million people, happily prints language that might give Hitler pause, is that still OK? Or is it worth responding this time, even if she’ll love every minute? A bit strong to compare Hopkins to Hitler? Read her column on page 11 of yesterday’s Sun. “Rescue boats? I’d use gunships to stop migrants”. That was The Sun's headline, written apparently without concern. She then refers to migrants in Calais who try to board trucks heading to Britain as “a plague of feral humans”. You have to ask why this woman is given the platform she is, the sun and now LBC... Why? I know there's a joke during internet conversations that they ultimately lead to Godwins law, but in this instance it does appear to have credence. “Make no mistake, these migrants are like cockroaches. They might look a bit “Bob Geldof’s Ethiopia circa 1984”, but they are built to survive a nuclear bomb. They are survivors”. In the environment that led to creation of the Third Reich in Germany, Polish people were seen as "an East European species of cockroach", while Jews were rats. When Hutu extremists used radio propaganda to incite violence against the Tutsis during the Rwandan Genocide, they called on people to “weed out the cockroaches.” Even before we consider her words in relation to the legal definition of racial hatred, The Sun has a responsibility to decide where to draw the line. Personally I feel it is a well orchestrated plan to dehumanise subgroups; refugees, migrants, and also to similar though covert extent the disabled and the unemployed. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...-10186490.html
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
or we could just focus on the real problem which is the migrants that we cant keep out?
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
Gatorade me, Bitch!
|
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
No there is a real problem with migrants trying to sneak into britain in lorrys. The mayor of calais is at her wits end as are the lorry drivers
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...urope-migrants http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-pictures.html I would hate to be a lorry driver on that route |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
30,000 migrants heading for UK are held in Calais: Record numbers have been stopped at borders since April last year
![]() Record numbers of illegal migrants are being stopped at UK borders, it was revealed last night. Senior officials said 36,000 unlawful stowaways had been discovered since last April. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3XgJpBgqM |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Actually, I like the term; 'Asylum seeker' better, because if Farage does not do well, then these 'Seekers' will continue to not only find this 'Asylum' but continue to FLOOD INTO IT. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
And the immigrants that you should worry about are third worlders, not other Europeans.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
No, in this thread I would like to focus on this.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
what the Reductio ad Hitlerum
oh yeah |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
No, the concerns as expressed regarding the hate propaganda exhibited in the mainstream media by this individual.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I suppose we must at least be thankful for that. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
Hands off my Brick!
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I don't even know if he did or didn't report Choudary and company, but all I was saying is that there have been FAR greater HATE crimes than Hopkins one, perpetrated on a daily basis in the UK for years, yet we do not hear of similar letters from The Society of Black Lawyers to the Metropolitan Police - or at least I can find no examples. One offence does not negate another, but though this 'letter' is definitely warranted - it's motives appear rather partisan to me. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
|
||||
Hands off my Brick!
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Hate Speech is Hate Speech, and I would find D. Peter Herbert's reporting of Hopkins far more acceptable and 'noble' if I was assured that he had been as equally moved and incensed by the far more serious Hate Speeches of Hamza and company and had similarly reported them. In a similar vein, I am a Christian, but I find ISIS beheadings of ANY innocent victims evil and atrocious - no matter what the Nationality, Colour, Race or Faith of those victims - and I have posted as much accordingly. Just my opinion. Last edited by kirklancaster; 21-04-2015 at 11:02 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
We all (myself included) have come from immigrants at some point, that's not the problem , the problem is rapid uncontrolled immigration into a small and already overstretched Island where the infrastructure is already full to bursting. That is why we cannot accept thousands upon thousands of new immigrants from Sub Saharan Africa. People who think it's the Holy Grail to come and live in Britain. It isn't, the UK has more than it's fair share of problems, I mean where are all these people supposed to live ? there is no Social housing for the people already here in fact we already have a vast shortage of housing. So where are all these new immigrants going to stay ? Do you have a spare room ? perhaps you could house a couple or they could camp in your garden. I mean it's ridiculous....... This is exactly why I support UKIP and their main policy of exiting the EU with its dangerous open doors policy to immigration. The sooner we exit the better, and the sooner we double or triple the numbers in our UK Border Control service the better. This one issue is so so serious I cannot overstate it.....
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The extreme Left are the biggest danger to this country's future NOT the extreme Right - in my opinion.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Of course it is Kirk, because you would personally be happy living under a right wing regime. What you're talking about is not the "biggest danger to this country" it's "the biggest danger to you personally regarding what you want this country to be".
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Quote:
The left seem to want to stand up for injustice, those who cannot speak for themselves, to be in unity with more organisations of the World than to be separatist. In the UK which has at present one of the most extreme and heartless right wing govts; for me the sooner the 'left' can take over the better. You would think it only had to be that those powerful and rich know better and also should be the only ones allowed to run the Country. Not a one party state but government that 'only' can come from the right and far right. Hardly democratic. That the views of the right are totally valid and those on the left should be silent,absolutely pathetic. Last edited by joeysteele; 21-04-2015 at 03:29 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
So you support the far right opinion?
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |||
|
||||
Gatorade me, Bitch!
|
It's an opinion column. She is entitled to her opinion. You don't have to agree with her. You don't even have to like her. I don't tend to read any of her columns, because she only writes these things for a reaction anyway.
|
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|