[Jodie.]

Right so would you rather have a winner that was genuinely nasty (eg Helen) who was a main character or someone nice but dull who hardly contributed to their series (think Sam)?

Poll incoming x

[Ramsay]

I've never been more annoyed by a winner than i was Sam so I picked nasty

[RileyH]

Helen is one of the best winners

[Daniel-X]

Hells bells is the best HM ever

[lewis111]

Hmmm idk cause I was more content with Helen winning than Sam
But I preferred Coleen, Scotty T, James etc winning rather than Bear

[UserSince2005]

I like it nasty

[Morgan.]

Dull because Helen and Bear are vile

[Jason.]

It depends if I like the nasty person or not.

[Epic.]

Absolutely dull x1000000000. Being dull > being a vile scumbag worth no positivity or oxygen

[Babayaro.]

Ideally, neither.

But if you're asking if I prefer Sam as a winner instead of Helen as a winner, then yes I do.

[Eddie.]

Even though I loathe Helen, I chose nasty as if they are not too vile, I think that would make me watch the series as we all do not want them to get the boot. If ypu are dull and have no personality, I thibk thry should be voted out early tbh...

[Withano]

Dull easily.

[reece(:]

Likeable

[Rufus]

Dull because they can still be somewhat likeable.

[Shaun]

Nice guys should always win.

[caprimint]

Dull because I'm not here for nasty people being rewarded for their behaviour