[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

You have a compulsive need to discuss me which clearly has not gone unnoticed by others. You need to keep yourself in check mate. You create the situation and then try to put it on me. You are a devious so and so.

Just to reiterate. Maybe I'm too optimistic. One more try.

This is your 42nd post in this thread
You have not yet responded to the thread topic once
I'd put all my money on you talking about yourself or other forum members in more than 35 of those posts.

That is an issue you need to address imo. And obviously in the opinion of others too.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

stop what?

Quoting Cherie?

My name has been worn out in this thread

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Perfectly good reason to ban him, yes, BUT the reason there's a question mark is that there are plenty of people guilty of this who are still posting away... and frankly, as bad as Truth was, I wouldn't say he was even in the top 5 worst. So why, specifically, was Truth made "the example" and permabanned? And without it being an ongoing policy of permabanning people guilty of what you describe?

Again I have to go back to the two possibilities: 1) he pissed off the wrong people on the wrong day or 2) his major issue generally was misogyny and that's considered by staff to be "a worse crime" (or rather, something they can't deal with seeing) MORE than other similar offenses, and the "reasoning" for the permaban was cobbled together after the decision was already made.

I’ve made threads about this before http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=334736 I’m sure with a rigid system in place people like him would have been gone a long time ago, but the fact of the matter is, as I said on page one, admin are more worried about the number of members than the quality of members

Originally Posted by Cherie

Lighten up Marsh can take a joke

Not the section for it, I’ve made jokes in SD before and ended up infracted bc people take it seriously

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Withano

Right.. but coming into threads, ignoring the OP, and instantly replying in disagreeance with someone whilst usually talking about herself or others wont help, obviously. Its what happened in this thread, its what happens regularly when she gets into SD&N.

Ive seen you bring that up b4 in other threads, i didnt see nor believe it then and im further from seeing it after todays performance.

People can see through you mate, sorry but me n you are about done ob here with eachother now...i dont like you.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Smithy

I’m a lady, I would never!

How serious was this post of yours on the first page

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Not the section for it, I’ve made jokes in SD before and ended up infracted bc people take it seriously

They can't have been very funny . I've never been infracted for making jokes in this section (because my jokes are always so funny).

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Cherie

My name has been worn out in this thread

Shut up Cherry.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Ive seen you bring that up b4 in other threads, i didnt see nor believe it then and im further from seeing it after todays performance.

People can see through you mate, sorry but me n you are about done ob here with eachother now...i dont like you.

I literally dont remember even talking to you more than one time before this that's a fine, I'm not looking for your friendship...

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Cherie

How serios was this post of yours on the first page

It wasn’t about another member and very serious I’ll have you know

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Smithy

I’ve made threads about this before http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=334736 I’m sure with a rigid system in place people like him would have been gone a long time ago, but the fact of the matter is, as I said on page one, admin are more worried about the number of members than the quality of members


Not the section for it, I’ve made jokes in SD before and ended up infracted bc people take it seriously

SD is the perfect section to send up members when they are being pompous and self aggrandising

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Shut up Cherry.

I will not

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

They can't have been very funny . I've never been infracted for making jokes in this section (because my jokes are always so funny).

No no, you see, mine were too funny, so they’re obviously not deemed as acceptable in this subforum

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by Smithy

@ the rest of the mods/admin why isn’t this the case

It is the case, they ask and we discuss it and decide

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

I agree with this.

Letting people back under new names just causes people to presume new members are multis and they get treated pretty badly by some members, DouglasS/MeMyselfandI is a prime example of someone coming back to simply cause trouble but being allowed back all the same.

He was allowed back and almost straight away he got caught cheating in the pub quiz and make it seem like it was Luke. How long until he acts out again?

That's a perfect example of someone coming back and despite the name change being exactly the same.

So in regards to the argument in favour of a multi return (a fresh start new username etc) it clearly hasn't happened here and is therefore another inconsistency.

TiBB is a strange animal.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Indeed, and if anyone steps in because it's so uncomfortable to read they get shut down by gang claims

That's right it borders on bullying imo, it gets really uncomfortable to see sometimes,I am glad I am not the only one who feels that way. do you wanna be in my gang Cherie, LOL

[Christmas Dynasnow]

wait, Smithy made a joke?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Lighten up Marsh can take a joke

Reported for mind reading.

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

It is the case, they ask and we discuss it and decide

Well clearly it isn’t if dezzy’s saying to doesn’t happen

Plus this

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

I agree with this.

Letting people back under new names just causes people to presume new members are multis and they get treated pretty badly by some members, DouglasS/MeMyselfandI is a prime example of someone coming back to simply cause trouble but being allowed back all the same.

He was allowed back and almost straight away he got caught cheating in the pub quiz and make it seem like it was Luke. How long until he acts out again?

Clearly there’s nothing of the sort, like I said, it’s all a numbers game now, which is sad because the forum suffers because of it

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Well clearly it isn’t if dezzy’s saying to doesn’t happen

Plus this



Clearly there’s nothing of the sort, like I said, it’s all a numbers game now, which is sad because the forum suffers because of it

It is the case.

[JerseyWins]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Ok.

Right i have been here nearly nine years...in the past ive been accused of trolling and the likes...

Still here though....however!

I am a bit suspicious of people being banned parmniontly but managing to make another account or people managing to make accounts for off season or on season.....


Whats folks views on this?

Just let them back. It's the internet and there's a block feature for members to use.

But in rare cases if people do something super seriously disrespectful, which I can't think what something like that would be, then sure I guess they should be permabanned and yes it should be monitored that they aren't returning.

Even then, they should be allowed an opportunity to return after a while anyway so I personally don't care if banned members make a return with another account.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

They can't have been very funny . I've never been infracted for making jokes in this section (because my jokes are always so funny).

My lack of infractions for joking in SD coincided with Josy's hiatus.

[Ashsleigh]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

I agree with this.

Letting people back under new names just causes people to presume new members are multis and they get treated pretty badly by some members, DouglasS/MeMyselfandI is a prime example of someone coming back to simply cause trouble but being allowed back all the same.

He was allowed back and almost straight away he got caught cheating in the pub quiz and make it seem like it was Luke. How long until he acts out again?

Yeah I was going to mention this. I was quite shocked about that.

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

It is the case.

If you say so

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

It is the case, they ask and we discuss it and decide

This is the problem.

Letting Niamh in on decision making.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by JerseyWins

Just let them back. It's the internet and there's a block feature for members to use.

But in rare cases if people do something super seriously disrespectful, which I can't think what something like that would be, then sure I guess they should be permabanned and yes it should be monitored that they aren't returning.

Even then, they should be allowed an opportunity to return after a while anyway so I personally don't care if banned members make a return with another account.

What about 2 accounts running at the same time?