[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

If it is regarded that Aaron was drunk, that is concluded as being not in control of his actions or thoughts then and therefore, the agreement in nul and void. Now, I'll play fair here and apply this same logic therefore to when Jay said Aaron could have his money - since Jay had been drinking that night. Let's say Jay was drunk, same rules apply.

So it's back to the Winner Take All re the £50k, with the other £50k being split as the 5 winners agreed upon.

Well, I don't view the two scenarios to be the same -drunk or not- as I've already pointed out numerous times. Was Aaron drunk when he made the deal?

Either way, I doubt his agreement is legally binding, more morally binding imo but as Vicky said whatever he chooses to do with the money isn't going to change what I think of him as a HM and I have my doubts as to whether Jay would have stuck to the agreement had he won.