[Jack_]

Originally Posted by arista

"the actions of Alan Pollock who still assaulted him"

Yes Jack
but he was clapped and they got moving again.

Are you a Liberal?

Anyone that clapped someone they've just witnessed assault another passenger is beyond pathetic, and if it were down to me I'd have them all charged with plain idiocy and crimes against morality. An applause from a group of people does not shy away from the fact that the guy was assaulted.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Anyone that clapped someone they've just witnessed assault another passenger is beyond pathetic, and if it were down to me I'd have them all charged with plain idiocy and crimes against morality. An applause from a group of people does not shy away from the fact that the guy was assaulted.

Crimes against morality? Really?

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Crimes against morality? Really?

It's morally wrong to assault someone, but it was a joke anyway

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Not sure the law would disagree with you there, by any legal definition he did commit assault

Like I said, let's see if the Police actually charge him and let's see if he is found guilty.

Originally Posted by Jack_

Anyone that clapped someone they've just witnessed assault another passenger is beyond pathetic, and if it were down to me I'd have them all charged with plain idiocy and crimes against morality. An applause from a group of people does not shy away from the fact that the guy was assaulted.

Which is just as well that it's not down to you then eh - seeing as neither of those 2 things you mentioned are crimes.

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by Snowball

Which is just as well that it's not down to you then eh - seeing as neither of those 2 things you mentioned are crimes.

The former certainly should be, I've definitely witnessed far too much of it in this thread that's for sure.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Jack_

The former certainly should be, I've definitely witnessed far too much of it in this thread that's for sure.

Truth of the matter is: they aren't.

[fruit_cake]

big man first undermined the ticket inspector and ruined any chance of him solving it peacefully and respectfully. He then assaulted a person without giving him adequate time to defend his case.

[arista]

Originally Posted by christmas_cake

big man first undermined the ticket inspector and ruined any chance of him solving it peacefully and respectfully. He then assaulted a person without giving him adequate time to defend his case.

He Asked first
then picked the Scam Punk up

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by arista

He Asked first
then picked the Scam Punk up

Okay comitting a crime is fine as long as you ask first?

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by christmas_cake

big man first undermined the ticket inspector and ruined any chance of him solving it peacefully and respectfully. He then assaulted a person without giving him adequate time to defend his case.

The Big Man asked the conductor if he wanted the yob removed. The conductor replied Yes. How is that undermining the conductor exactly?

I think any chance of it being resolved respectfully flew out the door when the yob began cursing at the Conductor.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by arista

Maybe another Youth , another time
has pulled a weapon on him.

This is Not a Random thing
thats why Worldwide they like the Big man
as Youths get away with to much

So that gives people the right to assault teenagers? One does something bad so they all deserve a lamping? Nice logic.

Originally Posted by Snowball

The Big Man asked the conductor if he wanted the yob removed. The conductor replied Yes. How is that undermining the conductor exactly?

I think any chance of it being resolved respectfully flew out the door when the yob began cursing at the Conductor.

If the conductor followed procedure then a situation wouldn't have arisen. Instead he chose to rile everyone up by saying it was the lad holding everyone up when it wasn't. That's the long and short of it.

It's quite funny and disturbing that you're more offended by bad language rather then violence and you think that the latter is a reasonable punishment for the former.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Anyone that clapped someone they've just witnessed assault another passenger is beyond pathetic, and if it were down to me I'd have them all charged with plain idiocy and crimes against morality. An applause from a group of people does not shy away from the fact that the guy was assaulted.

They wanted to get Home

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by arista

They wanted to get Home

I'm often in a rush and there are people in front of me blocking my way by walking incredibly slow, however annoying that is and however much I may think to myself (or joke to a friend) that I should or wish I could just throw them out of the way, I don't. And why? Because surprisingly, it's against the law to do so.

Impatience does not justify assault.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Jack_

I'm often in a rush and there are people in front of me blocking my way by walking incredibly slow, however annoying that is and however much I may think to myself (or joke to a friend) that I should or wish I could just throw them out of the way, I don't. And why? Because surprisingly, it's against the law to do so.

Impatience does not justify assault.

But again
10mins before the Film Started.


In any Court
This Punk Scammer will also be in trouble