oh fack off
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
|
oh fack off
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434
Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony IAC2019: Ian Wright
|
Entertainment every single day of the week, and I find it just plain stupid when people vote based upon how nice somebody is.
The twins are ****ing vile. But they make incredibly great TV, and should definitely be one of the contenders to win. I could not live with them, or be around them, their arrogance is disgusting and they have pretty repulsive personalities, but their entertainment value to a show like Big Brother is of significant importance.
Gareth, however, and housemates like Rachel Rice, while lovely, kind people, are excruciatingly dull and as such, offer absolutely nothing to the show whatsoever. Housemates that cause drama, start arguments, are involved in controversy spark discussions and debate that forums like these thrive on and shows like Bit On The Side rely on, without them we would have nothing to talk about, the show would fall flat on its face and would be rendered almost unwatchable. It is crucial that these interesting, entertaining housemates remain until the very end so that the entire series remains interesting. Rachel Rice and Gareth type housemates are completely disposable, they sit in the background and offer nothing of importance and almost always make the final undeservingly through no other reason than slipping under the radar.
It is essential that the interesting personalities remain, and when the final night comes, it seems completely illogical to me that anyone could even begin to consider voting for someone that has offered up **** all to the show. It just doesn't make sense. Yes, they're nice people...but this is a TV entertainment show, not a tea party with your friends. There's a big difference and sadly, people stupidly make the mistake of thinking the two are the same thing and should be treated as such, when they really aren't.
Winners like Rachel Rice in effect kill off the show. At the end of the day, the housemate who has offered the most up to the show, i.e. sparked the most discussions throughout the series...is the housemate who should win. They made the show, they should be rewarded for it. It's as simple and as easy to understand as that.
|