Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyramid*
he was known to be involved with her as far back as February this year...... at which point she could only have been 14 - that's when people started to notice and be aware of what was going on - It could have been going on a lot longer: in which case, she may not have reached puberty therefore the term paedophile may indeed be correct.
Regardless of the terminology people are using: he is a sex offender. Of that there is no dubiety.
|
well with the greatest of respect, I do not know if she is nearly 16 or has only just turned 15, and if anything the length of the affair (since at least as early as Feb) only adds weight to the argument that it could be real relationship and not the 'lust driven' affair others are making it out to be.
Threaded Mode