[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Why bring it up then if not to try to discredit the man and his complaint about Katie Hopkins and the Sun Editor?

I'm sorry, but I really don't understand what you mean? What I meant by my post was; does this 'Black Lawyer' find Hopkins comments against immigrants more offensive than Immigrant Islamic Preacher's Hate Speeches against the British? And if so, WHY? when Hopkins comments - though offensive - are far more benign in comparison than Choudary's or Hamza's?

Hate Speech is Hate Speech, and I would find D. Peter Herbert's reporting of Hopkins far more acceptable and 'noble' if I was assured that he had been as equally moved and incensed by the far more serious Hate Speeches of Hamza and company and had similarly reported them.

In a similar vein, I am a Christian, but I find ISIS beheadings of ANY innocent victims evil and atrocious - no matter what the Nationality, Colour, Race or Faith of those victims - and I have posted as much accordingly.

Just my opinion.