[AarynGriesfan]

Originally Posted by Bah HuMBug

...no? But Ken's risky strategy of taking David as far as he benefitted his game and then cutting him at the final turn is the only thing which could possibly have won him some votes, had he played it better at FTC (hypotheticals are fun!), so he didn't have any other options

And Hannah actually played it well at FTC so the fact that the jury chose to reward Adam for failing to do the same thing, albeit a day earlier, instead was out of her control (plus, it would have been pointless for Hannah and Ken to go with Bret and Adam when they were aligned at the precious vote, since they'd either have a) voted together against either Hannah or Ken or b) vied against one another to take both Hannah and Ken as the goats they were, which the jury would have lapped up)

Convincing the jury to vote for you is not out of your control.