[Jamie89]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

So you genuinely believe that at a multi-million pound company, with a huge marketing division full of highly paid professionals, who create adverts and keep their finger on the pulse of the public on a daily basis... not one person viewed the image of a black person removing their skin to reveal a white person - REGARDLESS OF INTENTION - and said "lol guys the internet is going to lose its **** over this".

I mean, come on.

If you had posted a sample of this on this forum, full of laypeople and ZERO advertising professionals, before it released and said "Will teh internets have a problem with this?", the answers would have ranged from "Yes, definitely" to "They shouldn't because it's PC gone mad but also yes because it's the internet".

Even the people who don't think it IS a problem still know that it WILL be a problem and that there will be a backlash.

But the at least 6 figure salary heads of avertising who have been in the ads game for decades at Dove, a Unilever company, one of the biggest parent companies in the world "got it wrong and didn't realise".

Jumping the shark majorly there let's face it.

Do i think it's unlikely that highly paid marketing people for a company as big as Dove that relies on its image and doesn't need to pull stunts to make sales would realise they've made a potentially racially offensive ad and respond with "lol guys the internet is going to lose its **** over this" - well yes, very unlikely. It doesn't make sense as like I said it wouldn't be worth it for them to risk their reputation over a racism controversy. Why would they seek that kind of attention when they don't need to?
And we don't know how many people were involved with the decision, it's a 3 second Facebook gif, not a large marketing campaign, and since a lot of people have seen nothing racist when viewing it, and the nature of how it even became a controversy - lifting screenshots out of context into a seperate post, it's believeable those marketing people wouldn't have either.
As y.winter said the concept of people fading into each other is hardly new, should they ensure only white people are cast in these types of ads, or that they must go in a specific order? It's all wildly over thinking such a simple ad and I disagree that most people would view it and see racism, and so given the lack of sense it would make for the marketing people at Dove to go ahead with it if it had been spotted, I think the most realistic explanation is that the potential for controversy was overlooked.

ETA: omg Ammi!