[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by lime

No you are wrong there Sheiriff which you continue to do about this case...the jury in this case consisted of 3 women and 9 men......you also claimed earlier in this thread that the girl in this case never mentioned rape originally wrong again..the first message from this girl was saying she was raped...she was however questioned for 2 days over why she never told those in the rape crisis centre she was orally raped.....over those 2 days she told them that she thought rape would mean anally or vagina "seems quite plauseable for me " she told them over those 2 days that she thought a penis being shoved her mouth was sexual assault

Then I stand corrected on the jury being split equally, in my eyes the fact it was not is totally wrong.

I don't remember saying the girl in this case never mentioned being raped.

To be honest I have not read up on this case in details like other members have, I have touched on the wider picture and women in general going home with people they only just met.