[Tom4784]

His reasons are his own, it doesn't really matter whether you think it's a stupid reason, it's his tattoo, his body and his reasoning.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

His reasons are his own, it doesn't really matter whether you think it's a stupid reason, it's his tattoo, his body and his reasoning.

Dezzy:
What about "little kids"
Loving M16 machine guns
all because its their Hero Football
has it on his leg

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by arista

Dezzy:
What about "little kids"
Loving M16 machine guns
all because its their Hero Football
has it on his leg

If that's the case their parents have failed them completely.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

If that's the case their parents have failed them completely.

Yes many Parents
let little kids on Tablets/Phones/Internet PC
to get a break etc.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

His reasons are his own, it doesn't really matter whether you think it's a stupid reason, it's his tattoo, his body and his reasoning.

Do you know no limits of hypocrisy?

By your reasoning above Tommy Robinson's reasons for being on the street outside the Court in Leeds are his own - it being his life, his choice, his video camera, and his reasoning' - and your opinion of why he was there "doesn't really matter".

Further; this a Serious Debates forum of which I am a member so unless you now actually own it besides just acting as if you do, then I have as much rights as you or any other member to express my opinions - one of which is that this footballer's reason for having the tattoo is STUPID.

Or is this yet another example of your duplicity; that you can crow about Human Rights, Civil Liberties and Equality when it suits your politics and your views but not when someone has the temerity to post an opinion or facts which do not align with your own?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

Do you know no limits of hypocrisy?

By your reasoning above Tommy Robinson's reasons for being on the street outside the Court in Leeds are his own - it being his life, his choice, his video camera, and his reasoning' - and your opinion of why he was "there doesn't really matter".

Further; this a Serious Debates forum of which I am a member so unless you now actually own it besides just acting as if you do, then I have as much rights as you or any other member to express my opinions - one of which is that this footballer's reason for having the tattoo is STUPID.

Or is this yet another example of your duplicity; that you can crow about Human Rights, Civil Liberties and Equality when it suits your politics and your views but not when someone has the temerity to post an opinion or facts which do not align with your own?

That the Tommy Robinson stuff and a footballers tattoos are in anyway similar is one of the most bizarre stretches I've heard here yet

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

That the Tommy Robinson stuff and a footballers tattoos are in anyway similar is one of the most bizarre stretches I've heard here yet

Not at all, Niamh.

I do not care about this footballer's tattoo as I have already said several times, I do think though that the reason he gave for having it is ridiculous and makes no sense.

I am expressing my opinion on that.

Dezzy does not believe the reason that Robinson gave as to why he was streaming outside that court and he expressed his opinion on that.

What is the difference?

The topics may be different but is it OK for one member to express an opinion doubting motive but not another member to do so?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

Not at all, Niamh.

I do not care about this footballer's tattoo as I have already said several times, I do think though that the reason he gave for having it is ridiculous and makes no sense.

I am expressing my opinion on that.

Dezzy does not believe the reason that Robinson gave as to why he was streaming outside that court and he expressed his opinion on that.

What is the difference?

The topics may be different but is it OK for one member to express an opinion doubting motive but not another member to do so?

There's a massive difference, one is someones reason for choosing a tattoo, the other is following around Muslims constantly to prove how bad they are, one is in prison, the other is a professional athlete

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

There's a massive difference, one is someones reason for choosing a tattoo, the other is following around Muslims constantly to prove how bad they are, one is in prison, the other is a professional athlete

OK - No problem, you can not see my point, Niamh, but I stand by it.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

There's a massive difference, one is someones reason for choosing a tattoo, the other is following around Muslims constantly to prove how bad they are, one is in prison, the other is a professional athlete

Tommy Robinson also endangered the trial of a peadophile ring by giving them ammunition for a mistrial and potentially risked the anonymity of their underage victims but that's okay because he hates muslims, I guess?

This topic isn't ultimately about Tommy Robinson, I can already see that he is becoming the new Corbyn...being dragged into every thread for petty point scoring whether it suits the topic or not.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Tommy Robinson also endangered the trial of a peadophile by giving them ammunition for a mistrial and potentially risked the anonymity of their underage victims but that's okay because he hates muslims, I guess?

This topic isn't ultimately about Tommy Robinson, I can already see that he is becoming the new Corbyn...being dragged into every thread for petty point scoring whether it suits the topic or not.

Getting a tattoo of a gun is much worse