[Vicky.]

If you wouldn't have infracted him Vicky, then why WAS he infracted? It all sounds dodgy to me.

Because mods are human, are different people and use discretion?

Seriously do you think we all agree with each others actions constantly? I wish you could see the admin forum, really.

The only way to get totally consistent moderating is to take humans out of the equation completely. Which clearly is not a possibility. Also context and such is important too most of the time, so blanket rules would not really work.

As I said, I would not personally have given an infraction for that, however I see why the thread was removed, and I also agree with the other infractions kirk is talking about which are apparently 'BS'. So yeah, wish I had stuck to not discussing this michael thing tbh. I can see how this thread is going to go now.