Quote:
Originally Posted by Josy
Nothing biased at all about my post, your comment above reads as if to be mocking anyone that is suspicious of questionable new members...
I mentioned nothing at all about the questioning of genuine new members nor not welcoming new signs ups, but it's our job to do what we can to insure the safety of our members and weeding out multis is part of that.
I found your post to be in complete disregard of members that have been affected in the past by issues caused by multi accounts, if you found it to be unpleasant then spare a thought for the members that where put through far worse, completely disregarding that at the same time as reminding the forum that your were once accused of being a multi is what I would describe as being biased tbqh.
|
Suspicions have to have some reasonable basis.
Knowing slang is not reasonable basis for suspicions, for crying out loud.
I honestly thought the idea of the slang used on chat being actually invented here was just funny joke

But apparently not
Re. my being disregarding of members who suffered bc of multis and trolls and you name it, how the hell am I supposed to know the depth of their suffering if it is a closely guarded secret? And forum carefully scrubbed of any signs of controversy? I'd started asking but soon stopped when I realized my knowledge may work against me (he knows too much he can't be a new member).
I posted about me bc I can see the same thing happening to the new members. Best if they're forewarned.