[GoldHeart]

And i hate how people use the excuse of "ohh well paedophiles don't abuse all kids" and "culkin was already famous" , if he was soo close to Maculay Culkin & Brett Barnes then surely something inappropriate would of happened?? .

I know predators don't abuse all kids , but surely they'd still be signs of grooming ?? and Culkin & Barnes spent ALOT of time with MJ so surely they would of seen evidence themselves that something very weird & wrong is going on??? .

wade robson and james safechuck claim he "moved onto other boys" aka Culkin & Barnes which implies MJ was abusing Culkin & Barnes yet Culkin & Barnes was never abused and they've always stood by MJ , there wasn't anything inappropriate going on with either of them . So why are we suppose to take Robson & Safechuck's word as gospel? and why do Culkin & Barne's words not matter anymore ?? .

Culkin has had alot of issues regarding addiction and family life , he pretty much stated his own dad was abusive to him . So why would he say his dad is abusive but cover for MJ ?. I don't think Culkin would protect MJ unless he genuinely knew & felt he was innocent .