[user104658]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I take it you did not watch the videos TS,as you would have heard that there was not ONE scrap of evidence against him ,why would you believe otherwise,this is after the FBI,child services and the police investigated him and also proven evidence of people lying about what they had seen,none existant photographs,surely if people can spare 4 hours to condemn him sure 1 hour of video to give the other side of the coin is worth a watch

This is exactly why most sexual assault cases fail in court though Kazanne; that there is no physical evidence and the entire case relies on witness statement. Why would there be physical evidence? Why would there be witnesses other than the victims? Why would he keep things like pictures or videos on his property knowing that a raid by the authorities was imminent?

The fact that there is no physical evidence is exactly what it is; a lack of evidence. It's not proof of innocence.

Are you really arguing that every case of sexual crime that goes nowhere through lack of evidence must be "false"? Less than 1% of sex crimes result in conviction. That statistic means something.

Ive also stated repeatedly that my opinion on the Jackson case is not based even "mostly" on this documentary.


I agree Annie though; there's not much point in this thread continuing at this point. We've all made up our minds and I think we'll have to agree to disagree.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

This is exactly why most sexual assault cases fail in court though Kazanne; that there is no physical evidence and the entire case relies on witness statement. Why would there be physical evidence? Why would there be witnesses other than the victims? Why would he keep things like pictures or videos on his property knowing that a raid by the authorities was imminent?

The fact that there is no physical evidence is exactly what it is; a lack of evidence. It's not proof of innocence.

Are you really arguing that every case of sexual crime that goes nowhere through lack of evidence must be "false"? Less than 1% of sex crimes result in conviction. That statistic means something.

Ive also stated repeatedly that my opinion on the Jackson case is not based even "mostly" on this documentary.


I agree Annie though; there's not much point in this thread continuing at this point. We've all made up our minds and I think we'll have to agree to disagree.

Why do you think there is no point in the thread now? I think it's a good debate mostly and yes some already have made there minds up,but it's good to see some people willing to be open minded to all info not just the so called 'documentry' and if there is no evidence why do some believe he is a peado ?Is it his looks the way he acts,his love for kids,having kids sleep over,none of which prove anything other than he was of a different mindset to us

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Why do you think there is no point in the thread now? I think it's a good debate mostly and yes some already have made there minds up,but it's good to see some people willing to be open minded to all info not just the so called 'documentry' and if there is no evidence why do some believe he is a peado ?Is it his looks the way he acts,his love for kids,having kids sleep over,none of which prove anything other than he was of a different mindset to us

Nothing new is being said, the same arguments are being reposted over and over from all sides and the responses are the same . I guess it's up to each individual to decide if there's a point in continuing but there isn't as far as I'm concerned. The general trend across the Internet now seems to be a concentrated effort to discredit and shame the accusers and I'm deeply uncomfortable with that, personally, no matter which side you come down on. I think Feldman covered that quite eloquently in his latter interview.

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Nothing new is being said, the same arguments are being reposted over and over from all sides and the responses are the same . I guess it's up to each individual to decide if there's a point in continuing but there isn't as far as I'm concerned. The general trend across the Internet now seems to be a concentrated effort to discredit and shame the accusers and I'm deeply uncomfortable with that, personally, no matter which side you come down on. I think Feldman covered that quite eloquently in his latter interview.

I have asked some pertinent questions and brought a fresh feel to the thread

Not that anyone has responded


The American citizenship for Wades family is puzzling me, can anyone answer how they got it and so quickly?

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I have asked some pertinent questions and brought a fresh feel to the thread



Not that anyone has responded





The American citizenship for Wades family is puzzling me, can anyone answer how they got it and so quickly?

No idea, sorry Cherie

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Nothing new is being said, the same arguments are being reposted over and over from all sides and the responses are the same . I guess it's up to each individual to decide if there's a point in continuing but there isn't as far as I'm concerned. The general trend across the Internet now seems to be a concentrated effort to discredit and shame the accusers and I'm deeply uncomfortable with that, personally, no matter which side you come down on. I think Feldman covered that quite eloquently in his latter interview.

I really like Corey, he went through so much as kid but comes across so together these days.