[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

This is exactly why most sexual assault cases fail in court though Kazanne; that there is no physical evidence and the entire case relies on witness statement. Why would there be physical evidence? Why would there be witnesses other than the victims? Why would he keep things like pictures or videos on his property knowing that a raid by the authorities was imminent?

The fact that there is no physical evidence is exactly what it is; a lack of evidence. It's not proof of innocence.

Are you really arguing that every case of sexual crime that goes nowhere through lack of evidence must be "false"? Less than 1% of sex crimes result in conviction. That statistic means something.

Ive also stated repeatedly that my opinion on the Jackson case is not based even "mostly" on this documentary.


I agree Annie though; there's not much point in this thread continuing at this point. We've all made up our minds and I think we'll have to agree to disagree.

Why do you think there is no point in the thread now? I think it's a good debate mostly and yes some already have made there minds up,but it's good to see some people willing to be open minded to all info not just the so called 'documentry' and if there is no evidence why do some believe he is a peado ?Is it his looks the way he acts,his love for kids,having kids sleep over,none of which prove anything other than he was of a different mindset to us