[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

There's no concrete proof that he abused them but there's also no concrete proof that they're lying; it's all just observations and various statements from each side. Your reasoning for any of us believing one argument over the other can only be on faith and balance of probabilities, at the end of the day, and it's odd to claim that it's anything other than that? A 100% suspicious mind would be equally suspicious of the counter-statements against Robson and Safechuck but you clearly are not... you choose to believe those counter-statements and in Jackson's innocence wholeheartedly. That's faith - not a suspicious mind.

TS, you are asking the same thing over and over and its all in my post why I am at the point I am and have come to hold the view I have on this now.
Also try to avoid telling me how to think, I know very well how to.


So to save time as Mrs May often says at PMQs.

'' I refer you to the answer I gave a while ago''.