Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 23-03-2019, 09:59 AM #11
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
People discussing their defence of Jackson against the allegations is pointless?

Literally no different to those discussing how they believe the allegations.
People discussing their defence against the allegations with other people who already believe that Jackson is innocent of those allegations? Posting "evidence" when it's quite clear that everyone's mind is set in stone on this issue and people have accepted that and moved on seems like a pointless circle-jerk TO ME, Marsh and I'm allowed to say so . You might not think so, they might not think so, and no one said they're not allowed to do it as you falsely suggested before, so please stop telling me what I'm "allowed and not allowed" to do and think .
user104658 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
abuse, amidst, bans, bbc, child, claims, jackon, michael, music


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts