[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Yes Marsh I'm aware that you're mainly known as the level-headed champion of the middle ground on Tibb. That much is undeniable. I'm sorry for accusing you of bias and tribalism. Again, how dare.

Not what was said was it? But by all means continue making stuff up. Desperation at its worst and most obvious. You said I was biased in what I said, I wasn't. Instead of acknowledging that and moving on you're now moving the goalposts and reaching for anything and everything. Sad.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Not what was said was it? But by all means continue making stuff up. Desperation at its worst and most obvious. You said I was biased in what I said, I wasn't. Instead of acknowledging that and moving on you're now moving the goalposts and reaching for anything and everything. Sad.

You responded to the comment about how I thought the thread had gone (pointless and circlejerky) from a biased position, yes. I acknowledge that you claim otherwise but countless (every?) other post you've made on the thread lead me to believe otherwise. I acknowledge that you're not an MJ Stan and that you don't really have an opinion either way on his guilt. However I think, like Joey, you were frustrated and irritated that some people are strongly stating a belief in him being guilty with supposedly insufficient evidence, and I think that frustration is what prompted your response to my observation about the direction the thread had taken (and in turn, the lie that I had insisted that "the discussion was over").

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

You responded to the comment about how I thought the thread had gone (pointless and circlejerky) from a biased position, yes. I acknowledge that you claim otherwise but countless (every?) other post you've made on the thread lead me to believe otherwise. I acknowledge that you're not an MJ Stan and that you don't really have an opinion either way on his guilt. However I think, like Joey, you were frustrated and irritated that some people are strongly stating a belief in him being guilty with supposedly insufficient evidence, and I think that frustration is what prompted your response to my observation about the direction the thread had taken (and in turn, the lie that I had insisted that "the discussion was over").

Frustration?

From a post I made THREE WEEKS ago? Which was responding to a very specific point that "eccentric person = guilty of heinous crime" that wasn't even a comment on the documentary or the two guys making the allegations but flippant remarks I'd seen made all over the place.

I also hadn't posted on the topic for over a week between my last post and the one responding to your circle jerk comment. Wow, my frustration with people believing him as guilty was clearly at PEAK LEVELS.

And now we have Joey's name being brought in too. Seems like you are frustrated with every member not agreeing with everything you're saying underneath all of this. That's an issue you shall have to deal with mate, not me.