| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Niamh | Hands off my Brick!
|
I mean it's important that all available evidence is checked my only issue is that stuff could be used that isn't relevant to the case in an attempt to assassinate the accusers character or "morals" as is often done to victims in rape cases. The prosecution making out the victim is a slut because of the knickers she was wearing etc.
Imo, the Police should be allowed check it but only use stuff directly linked to whoever the accused is/potential evidence to the particular crime. Not for example see she logged onto Tindr so therefore was asking for it, if you get what I mean
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
I Cant Breathe
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Niamh | Hands off my Brick!
|
No they're not, but it seems to be only the ones who are women that get their names and sexual history dragged through the mud in court cases
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Niamh | Hands off my Brick!
|
A very high number of victims of sexual assault/rape don't come forward Adam, but what we do know is that women have their character and morals assassinated in courts when they do. I've not seen that happen to male victims of rape. Women have had their underwear passed around the courtroom and used as evidence as to why she couldn't have been raped. Womens sexual history has been brought into the arguments as to why she couldn't have been raped. Do you not agree with that?
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...although it may be that there have been cases where accessing a phone could have given crucial information, I wonder how many cases that would have been...it’s a difficult one because in general I’m against the police having this access...phones hold so much of people’s lives, their passwords to everything...and I don’t think this is information which should be forced into sharing...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|